Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

там, где лиса спит

@toriviotree

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,874subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002005901655
TypeChannel
Username@toriviotree
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/toriviotree

Growth

1,8741,8821,8787 August 2026 — 1,881 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,881 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,882 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,874 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,873–1,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:011,874-8
8 Aug 2026, 10:261,882+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:031,881no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:581,881first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.7%
avg views ÷ 1,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
968
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (14 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,651
Reactions total1,875
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,043 reactions across 12 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.00% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53077090094599717191437.00%
custom 53075364720337616321346.56%
custom 52290154117768496791316.41%
custom 54494949165121268441165.68%
custom 51929635207187416101155.63%
custom 53033252952547320121095.34%
custom 54249042616474990941085.29%
custom 52107776534931409121014.94%
custom 5206342172047091505934.55%
custom 5395485432181969334924.50%
custom 5395607439317948300874.26%
custom 5305269287647222023813.96%
custom 5231179310789857819683.33%
🕊683.33%
custom 5283230294327968415612.99%
custom 5461080771181704852572.79%
custom 5413330823728364095552.69%
custom 5305669050318230183542.64%
custom 5276133234533494106492.40%
custom 5316854631215689267482.35%
12 further kinds27313.4%

Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,043reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toriviotree. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC200 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟 не обесценивай то, 🌟🌟🌟 что получилось ⭐️⭐️сделать сегодня⭐️⭐️

custom 522904592322452478916custom 54249976557113447047custom 54181568895003276825

7 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC341 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⠀🌟🌟🌟 дом, где.. 🌟🌟🌟 всегда в тебя верят, заботятся и напоминают о том, что важно 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ ˗ˋˏ🤍popcorn grains🤍ˎˊ˗ здесь можно почувствовать себя так, словно мама укрывает тебя одеялом и говорит: 🌼✧ ты уже всего достойна 🌼✧ все совершают ошибки 🌼✧ с тобой все в порядке 🐰🐰🐰— следуй за зайчиками, они проводят тебя: 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 🐰 @warm_aesthetic🐰🐰🐰

custom 547217361944027870618custom 537971089347711165511custom 54719531072293680017

6 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC535 views139 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🤩🌿🌿🌿🌿 🤩🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 🌟 магний, 🌿🌿🌿 🌟 который мне 🌿 🌟 нужен! 🌟

custom 530526928764722202381custom 530787715313464812431custom 531013856079015383427

2 Aug 2026, 09:10 UTC955 views172 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 ⋆⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⋆ честно, если бы меня спросили год назад, что окажется для меня самым разрушительным в отношениях, я бы ответила — измена. сейчас я уже не уверена. потому что жить долгое время в ощущении, что сегодня тебя выбирают, а завтра — нет, оказалось для меня гораздо более разрушительным 🤩🤩

custom 539548543218196933492custom 539560743931794830048custom 539577290293302525732

30 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC≈1,040 views254 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 мама была права: 🌟🌟 я реально хочу все на блюдечке с голубой каёмочкой + сесть на шею и свесить ножки + как сыр в масле + жить припеваюче + никаких сюрпризов, кроме приятных + хиханьки и хаханьки 🤲☕️

custom 5229015411776849679131custom 523117931078985781968custom 541333082372836409555

27 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC≈1,210 views190 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

★:: любовь прекрасна но, кажется, самым особенным в ней всегда останется момент до первого 🌿🌿 признания. когда вы оба 🌿🌿 уже всё понимаете, но продолжаете неуклюже делать вид, что ничего не происходит. наверное, потому что этот момент невозможно пережить дважды ⭑.ᐟ

custom 530770900945997171999custom 527613323453349410649custom 521077765349314091242

26 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,070 views179 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 я сказала ему, что мне приснился кошмар. он спросил: 𖦹 «монстр был страшный?» 𖦹 🌱🌱 мне приснилось, что вся моя жизнь состояла из фразы «ещё не время» не время переезжать не время увольняться не время путешествовать не время начинать, а потом во сне оказалось, что времени больше нет 🤩🌟 ⠀

custom 5303325295254732012109custom 539560743931794830039custom 545836365461116305831

23 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,130 views249 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

у меня спросили: 👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️ ⋆✩⋆ 👳‍♂️👳‍♂️ как ты думаешь, важнее любить или быть любимым? 👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️👳‍♂️ но я ответила - какое крыло для птицы важнее, правое или левое?

custom 5307536472033761632134custom 528323029432796841561custom 530566905031823018354

20 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC≈1,310 views202 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 ::представь, однажды у 🌟🌟 нас будет дом возле него я каждый год буду сажать что-нибудь новое ⭑ летом окна будут открыты с самого утра ⭑ а на подоконниках всегда будут стоять полевые цветы ⭑ по вечерам во дворе пахнет травой после полива ⭑ ты будешь косить газон ⭑ а я — делать вид, что помогаю, хотя на самом деле снова фотографирую цветы ⭑ потом мы будем сидеть во дворе с чашками чая и спорить только о том,

custom 5424904261647499094108custom 546108077118170485257🕊37

18 Jul 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,690 views219 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 говорите обо мне что угодно 🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟 но дети мне улыбаются; животные без страха подходят ко мне; растения почему-то не спешат погибать; а люди начинают говорить чуть откровеннее, чем собирались и перестают куда-то спешить

custom 5449494916512126844116custom 521077765349314091259custom 530770900945997171944

17 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC≈1,170 views207 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 строить планы — это ✩ 🌟🌟 как покупать красивый блокнот, сначала кажется, что в ✩ нем обязательно должно быть что-то особенное, а потом он месяцами лежит нетронутый, ✩ потому что жалко начинать ⋆🤍🫁💕🥳🫁👸😉🧏‍♀️🤍😊⋆

custom 5192963520718741610115custom 531685463121568926748custom 531673469425394496344

14 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,660 views168 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌫️ 🌟🌟🌟🌟 июль придумали для того, чтобы: 💗чаще соглашаться на спонтанные прогулки 💗 переставать считать время 💗 откладывать все серьёзные разговоры хотя бы до вечера 💗 возвращаться домой с пыльными кроссовками 💗 носить в кармане случайно найденные камушки 💗 есть ягоды прямо с куста 💗 каждый вечер говорить «завтра точно лягу пораньше» 💗 и снова обещать себе чаще жить именно так💗

custom 520634217204709150593custom 532103427863979262344🕊31

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @toriviotree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 409,530 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“там, где лиса спит” (@toriviotree), 1,874 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toriviotree.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.