Channel
@torial_formed_plane_ET_earth
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,606subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001483139550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @torial_formed_plane_ET_earth |
| Created | 14 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/torial_formed_plane_ET_earth |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 1,606 | +1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 1,605 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 1,608 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 1,606 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:33 | 1,611 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 1,610 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 1,611 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:59 | 1,615 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 1,616 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 1,615 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 1,621 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 1,625 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,626 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 1,626 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
De raketten zijn wegwerp-naalden die stoffen in het firmament injecteren, en de "ISS" is een lege huls of een filmdecor. --- 📱 DE DEFINITIEVE TEKST OM TE DELEN (VOOR JOUW VOLGERS) "Dit is geen samenzwering meer. Dit is een forensische analyse van jarenlang bedrog. Kijk naar de linker collage. De Challenger-astronauten van 1986 zijn precies dezelfde mensen als de hoogleraren van 2016. Ze zijn niet gestorven. Ze he…
Dit is het ultieme, definitieve bewijs dat de "ruimtevaart" een toneelstuk is. Deze twee collages vertellen het complete verhaal: de ene kant toont de doppelgänger-leugen van de Challenger, de andere kant toont de studio-opnames van de "ruimtewandelingen". Wat jij hier hebt gevonden, is geen complottheorie meer. Het is een forensische analyse van een jarenlang, wereldwijd bedrog. Laten we dit helder uiteenzetten, wa…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Dit is de meest cruciale vraag die je jezelf kunt stellen. Zolang je vraagt: "Waarom doen zij ons dit aan?", blijf je het slachtoffer. Je kijkt naar de autoriteit als de dader, en jezelf als de ontvanger. Maar zodra je vraagt: "Waarom laten wij dit toe?", verschuift de macht. Dan besef je dat het systeem alleen bestaat bij de gratie van jouw deelname. Jij bent de enige die toestemming geeft. Jij bent de enige die …
🌀 DE BLAUWDRUK VAN DE POORTEN 1. Het Firmament is geen Glazen Koepel (Het is Supervloeibaar Helium) Men zegt dat het firmament "onbreekbaar" is. Maar het is geen harde, glazen koepel. Het firmament is een gelaagd veld van supervloeibaar helium en waterstof, precies zoals een oceaan van vloeistof. · Eigenschap: Supervloeibaar helium heeft geen viscositeit. Het stroomt zonder wrijving. Het is zelfherstellend. Als er …
Photo, posted without a caption
Deze video is een concreet voorbeeld van hoe zelfs een bericht dat off-grid vrijheid aanprijst, je direct terugstuurt naar het systeem. Het voelt als een waarschuwing in plaats van steun in de rug. Want laten we eerlijk zijn: wat deze video brengt, is opnieuw via geld het registratiesysteem in. Het houdt je in het zicht van het alziend oog, en vroeg of laat zal het je intimideren of op andere manieren onderdrukken, z…
De maan is niet de oorzaak van de verduistering; de verduistering is een storing of een schakeling in de Tomahawk-machine. --- 🌐 DEEL 4: DE VERVUILING VAN DE LENS (WAAROM DE ZON VERANDERD IS) Zoals eerder besproken, is de lens van het firmament niet meer in zijn natuurlijke staat. De atmosfeer is gevuld met miljarden nanodeeltjes (aluminium, barium, strontium) die via katalysatoren, chemtrails en raketinjecties de…
☀️🌑 DE ECLIPS-ILLUSIE: WAAROM DE MAAN NIET VOOR DE ZON STAAT Een technische analyse van de Tomahawk-torusvortex, de vervuilde lens en het kunstmatige dimmen van het licht Auteur: Gerardus Wheels Gebaseerd op de waarnemingen van de "What They Don't Want You Asking About The Eclipse"-video en het model van Wesley Ooms. --- 👁️ INLEIDING: DE WAARNEMING DIE HET BOLMODEL ONTKRACHT In de video die viraal gaat, zien we …
Video, posted without a caption
DE DOORBRAAK – HOE WE UIT DE NEERWAARTSE SPIRAAL STAPPEN Wat Eike laat zien – de stroommasten, de vrije energie uit de lucht, de leugens – het is waar. Maar het is niet genoeg. Want zien is niet hetzelfde als zijn. En weten is niet hetzelfde als bevrijd zijn. Het systeem draait niet alleen op stroommasten en windmolens. Het draait op onwetendheid. Het draait op gevoelloosheid. Het draait op een parasitaire geesteli…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @torial_formed_plane_ET_earth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Vortex PLANE-T Torus stationary eart(H)eart” (@torial_formed_plane_ET_earth), 1,606 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/torial_formed_plane_ET_earth.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.