Channel
@topolSpiderWTFisgoingon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002415923577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topolSpiderWTFisgoingon |
| Description | Етить-колотить ЯМы медный торчок |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topolSpiderWTFisgoingon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 10 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 10 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
98 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 32.7% | |
| 😭 | 23 | 23.5% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 12.2% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 10.2% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.04% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.02% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 18 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иии ещё была одна мысль Хотела написать пост о том, как Лини постепенно вспоминали мужей и что на данный момент таймлайна они уже вспомнили Пока они баловались наростом они также пытались зарисовать примерные их образы У меня правда вышел только один, кхем- /Лини не умеет рисовать от слова совсем поэтому— да/
❤5❤🔥1🙏1
Я продолжу напоминать вам о своём существовании и расскажу о концепте который так и не был воплощён в жизнь хдд Это ЭндерЛини Была мысль о смене ориджина, но я очень /ОЧЕНЬ/ долго думала и в итоге передумала Но всё-таки концепты остались и они мне очень нравятся так что почему бы и не показать их здесь /На последней картинке, к слову, напротив "не родившихся" ЭндерЛини оригинальный ЭндерЛини, из одной из наших АУшек…
❤5❤🔥1🥰1🙏1
Подождите я только сейчас заметила вы почему плачете-
🥰1
❔- Куда они попали после того, как прыгнули в портал?... – Вопрос хороший К сожалению, пока что сама не знаю на него ответа, но рано или поздно всё будет, слово арахнида ✋
😭4
❔- ТАК ЧТО В ИТОГЕ С ЛАПКАМИ ЛИНИ???? – Лини вырвали себе лапки после того, как сбежали от родителей из родного мира. После этого, восстановившись /не без помощи людей из мира, куда они прыгнули/, они встретились с Оливером 🌸
❤3
@SoulLiniBot Я совершенно ни на что не намекаю что вы... НУ ПРОСТО МАЛО ЛИ вдруг у кого-то есть вопросики вот дружеское напоминание 🌸
❤1
Брайт был очень обеспокоен, когда пришёл на дачу и повёл меня на спавн. Он объяснил, что происходит. А как же собор? А как же Вель, что отправился за призмарином? Я бы не успели добраться до грибов Границы убили бы меня быстрее, и я всё равно возродились бы на даче Портал был сломан Нет шансов добраться до него и предупредить . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Мы подождали остальных и двинулись в…
❤3🙏3
Паучары гоус бррр #мем
🔥1🥰1
На чилле на расслабоне #арт
🔥1🥰1
⚠️🔠🔠: н*ркотики, н*ркотическое опьянение 🦋🌨️🦋🌨️🦋🌟🦋🌨️🦋🌨️🦋 Дни после свадьбы Брайта и Рико были.. насыщенными. Жаль что я помню не много. Ещё на самой свадьбе, помимо радости за молодых, было ещё какое-то чувство, которое я объяснить, увы, не могу. Под конец торжества я задались вопросом - а было ли у меня такое когда-то? Вроде и кольцо есть, и мужей вспоминаю, а о свадьбе ни единого воспоминания. ... Странно. Хотя.…
😭4🕊2💔1
🌟🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🪦🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌟 Через пару дней Веля пришёл меня проведать. Я уже оклемались от действия нароста, поэтому собирали тыквы и воск у пчёл. Это было мило, что он решил проверить как я, но меня напрягло что он был в элитрах... Я спросили, не Элитра ли говорит за него "Элитры здесь нет. И Авиана тоже." 🔣🔣🔣Вот оно как. Элитра как-то сказал мне, что он предложил Авиану слиться в одно целое, и, похоже, он всё-таки прин…
😭5🕊3👍1💔1
🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣 🤩🤩🔠❤️🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🔣🔣🤩🤩🔠❤️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩❤️🤩🔠🤩🔣🔣🔣 🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣🔣 #арт #лор
🕊6😭5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @topolSpiderWTFisgoingon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,323,306 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Soul! Lini 🕸️” (@topolSpiderWTFisgoingon), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topolSpiderWTFisgoingon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.