Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 59 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,226–1,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 01:35
1,232
-2
29 Sept 2026, 01:40
1,234
-8
18 Sept 2026, 21:21
1,242
-4
14 Sept 2026, 12:19
1,246
-2
10 Sept 2026, 13:18
1,248
-3
5 Sept 2026, 13:21
1,251
-2
1 Sept 2026, 08:16
1,253
-5
29 Aug 2026, 18:45
1,258
-2
27 Aug 2026, 04:46
1,260
-2
24 Aug 2026, 15:27
1,262
+1
20 Aug 2026, 15:11
1,261
-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:28
1,263
-3
14 Aug 2026, 14:04
1,266
-5
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
1,271
-2
8 Aug 2026, 12:38
1,273
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:47
1,274
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:55
1,274
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 22 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
490 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
159
32.4%
🔥
142
29.0%
🕊
50
10.2%
💔
40
8.16%
❤🔥
36
7.35%
😢
31
6.33%
👍
16
3.27%
🙏
7
1.43%
🥰
3
0.612%
👎
2
0.408%
🏆
1
0.204%
💋
1
0.204%
😭
1
0.204%
🤔
1
0.204%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 490 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2024 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
УМЕРЛА ЛЕГЕНДА!
Скончалась моя подруга, звезда «Битвы Экстрасенсов» - Юлия Корнеева.
Мертвую Юлию, которой было всего 47 лет, нашел дома гражданский муж она сидела в кресле уже мертвая. Сейчас будут проводить судмедэкспертизу и выяснять истинную причину смерти ведьмы.
Многие обвиняли ее в злоупотреблении, но я знаю, что она уже полтора года не пила алкоголь и на здоровье не жаловалась. Также я знаю, что у нее были…
У нас для тебя предсказание на 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣
Жми на кружок и лови ✨
Смотри премьеру нового сезона «Экстрасенсы. Битва сильнейших» в субботу в 18:00 на ❤️❤️❤️
Видео падения метеорита в небе над Якутией!
Космический гость прилетел около 8 вечера по московскому времени. Его размер, по мнению учёных - чуть менее метра.
Астероид заметили около суток назад, но панику поднимать не стали, до поверхности Земли шансов долететь у него не было. Он эффектно сгорел в атмосфере.
Дима Билан не берет в руки подарки от поклонников, чтобы на него не навели порчу и не напитали его негативной энергией
“Коротко о жизни артиста и работе с огромным количеством человеческих энергий. А на концерте они бывают совершенно разные. В ком-то я вижу радость и счастье, а в ком-то — отчаяние или печаль. Поэтому и существуют свои правила, когда знаешь, как принимать подарки. Так что все пришедшее преобразую в д…
Внимательные пользователи соцсетей отмечают, что Майкл Гэмбон и Мэгги Смит — Профессор Дамблдор и профессор Макгонагалл — ушли в один день, разницей всего в год
Настоящая магия — поднимаем палочки вверх!
😈TOP MAGIC
🥀 Мэгги Смит, сыгравшая профессора Минерву Макгонагалл в «Гарри Поттере» скончалась
Об этом сообщила её семья.
«Она мирно умерла в больнице рано утром в пятницу 27 сентября. Она провела последний день жизни с друзьями и семьей. У нее остались двое сыновей и пятеро любящих внуков, которые опустошены потерей своей необыкновенной матери и бабушки», — сообщают СМИ со ссылкой на заявление родных.
Профессору Макгонагалл…
В аккаунте «Битвы Экстрасенсов» появились ответы на вопросы телезрителей.
Будет ли 3-й сезон «Реванша», сколько участников попадут в «Битву Сильнейших» и кто сильнее Ольга Якубович или Ангелина Изосимова?
А что вы думаете по этому поводу? 🫵🏻
Вы тоже можете прислать новости/ пруфы в ЛС @topmagic_tg (Анонимность гарантируем)
😈TOP MAGIC
🔥24❤4❤🔥2👍2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @topmagic_magazine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOP MAGIC | Битва Экстрасенсов” (@topmagic_magazine), 1,232 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topmagic_magazine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
