Channel
@topheadz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
982subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002171835008 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topheadz |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topheadz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 982 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 980 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 987 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 990 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 991 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 May 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 311 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
91 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 48 | 52.7% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 23.1% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 22.0% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.20% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The higher you climb, the less truth reaches you. Your team says yes. The board sees a presentation, not you. Recruiters call only when they need something. The last time anyone assessed you honestly was years ago. And in that silence a quiet question starts to grow: am I still a strong professional, or just someone who has held this title for a long time? That question is why we built Skill Check. You pick your r…
Imagine a trading platform operating across 10+ jurisdictions. Each one has its own laws, its own regulators, and its own risk appetite. For most lawyers, that is chaos. For him, it is a familiar working environment. Senior Legal Executive with 16 years of experience in commercial law. A practicing attorney with an active European legal status. His core specialization is in some of the most technology-driven and he…
❤2👍1🔥1
Most executive profiles on LinkedIn are built on the same mistake: they're written for people who already know the person behind them. But a recruiter doesn't read a profile. They search for it. LinkedIn Recruiter is essentially a query to a database. A headline that reads "Seasoned executive | Driving growth" instead of "CFO | fintech | capital raising" simply returns someone else in the results. This week Linked…
❤2👍1🔥1
How do you know if you’re the exact CTO top companies are hunting for? When evaluating candidates for executive roles, I often see a gap between how tech leaders assess themselves and what the market actually demands. To give you an objective reality check, we built the TOPHEADS CTO Self-Assessment. No fluff — just 15 minutes of tough, scenario-based questions that test how you make decisions in the real world. Yo…
🤩2👍1🔥1
Luxury hospitality revenue doesn't grow by accident. It grows where commercial strategy, client relationships, and market intelligence converge under decisive leadership. A senior commercial leader with 13 years across some of the world's most prestigious hotel brands — Mandarin Oriental, Waldorf Astoria and Kempinski among them. Currently Acting Commercial Director at an iconic Middle East luxury property, running …
❤3👍1🔥1
EUR 6 million in overdue receivables. Cleared to zero. A finance function built from nothing across three entities. Monthly close down to five days. A CFO with 20+ years across industrial, fintech, trading and consumer finance — Gulf, Europe and APAC. Selected results: - Complete finance function built from scratch for a 3-entity UAE group - 5-day monthly close, with owner reporting on the same cadence - 30% gain …
❤2👍1🔥1
Cross-border M&A. Crisis-proof refinancing. Institutional debt raised from a standing start. Hundreds of millions moved across four continents and multiple tax regimes — and made to hold. A qualified CPA and senior finance leader with 20+ years across Big-4 audit, financial advisory, and CFO / VP Finance roles — spanning Israel, the Middle East, Europe, and the CIS. Selected results: — Closed a $90m cross-border ac…
❤2👍1🔥1
Three transformations. 1.5x net profit growth. 4,000 FTEs optimised. 53% faster service delivery. All measurable, all delivered. A senior strategy and transformation executive with 20+ years across major financial institutions and consulting is open to new mandates. — Led enterprise-wide transformation at a major Eastern European commercial bank - 1.5x net profit growth, +20% assets, +7pp ROE improvement. — Orchestr…
❤4👍2🔥2
When we ask an executive where they're weakest in the top job, the usual answer is a pause. It isn't modesty. We rarely see ourselves the way the people who vet candidates for these roles do. We built an assessment that lets you look at yourself through their eyes in fifteen minutes. It isn't a personality quiz — it draws on the approaches used to assess people for these roles professionally. Take it without trying…
❤1👍1🔥1
You don't search for your next role — it finds you. Every day, Job Scan scans hundreds of sources and surfaces not just "similar jobs," but the ones that actually fit you. We understand who you are and what you're working toward — your level, your goals, your red lines. This isn't a job feed. It's a personal search that understands you. Job Scan is available to platform members only. So open your dashboard and tr…
❤3
A big study coming out at TOPHEADS on what companies actually want from their top people. More than 40,000 executive job descriptions from around the world were reviewed, and one number already stands out: over 70% of them ask for "strategic leadership." Almost none of them say what that's supposed to mean. The most common requirement for a senior leader turns out to be the vaguest one. Everybody wants it, and almos…
❤4
Almost everyone has done this at least once. Opened a map late at night, looked at a city they've never lived in, and thought: what if I just packed up and moved. For most, it stays a daydream. For some, it becomes the best decision of their life. And some quietly move back a year later, out a year and a pile of money. The difference is almost never the country. It's whether the person was ready. That's why TOPHEA…
❤3🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @topheadz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOPHEADS by Torchinsky” (@topheadz), 982 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topheadz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.