Чьи любимые блогеры уже перешли из Телеграмма в другие соцсети? Кидайте ссылки в комментарии ⮕ ⮕ ⮕
❤6

Channel
@topdeaf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,448subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002195135993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @topdeaf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/topdeaf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 2,448 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 2,452 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 2,453 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 2,453 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
205 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 37.6% | |
| 🔥 | 61 | 29.8% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 22.9% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 2.44% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.488% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.488% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Чьи любимые блогеры уже перешли из Телеграмма в другие соцсети? Кидайте ссылки в комментарии ⮕ ⮕ ⮕
❤6
Телеграмм совсем заблокируют? Что думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Говорят, сегодня был сбой в Телеграмм. У вас было? 👍🏻 - да, сбой был ❤️ - нет, все нормально
❤19👍14💯2🤔2
Кого смотрит глухая молодежь? Именно этот вопросы мы задали на форуме в Хабаровске. И вот каких блогеров назвали ребята. Алексей Афа Афанасьев Дмитрий Щелкунов Алексей Соколов Рамина Яна Никитко Милена Холя Глухих.нет Мария Калинина Ника Брови Марина Воробьева Виктория Салий И Вероника Светлова Кстати, личные бренды Алексея Соколова и Милены участники форума даже сами разобрали прямо на сцене. Это было 🔥🔥 Видеть…
🔥5❤3👏3😁1
Интересный комментарий от Ольги Бородич. Что думаете? На какого блогера вы подпишитесь - с хорошим РЖЯ или с плохим РЖЯ/КЖР?
👌1
Не совсем так.У кого легкий РЖЯшный,к тому идут,а не к тем,у кого РЖЯ и КЖР(глухим надо знать русский язык!).
👍2
В 18:05 по Мск выложим, кого из глухих блогеров смотрит глухая молодежь. Или что мы узнали на форуме «Слушая сердцем» в Хабаровске. А свои варианты ответов вы всё ещё можете оставить здесь: https://t.me/topdeaf/748
❤3
У вас есть свой личный бренд Ваш личный бренд - это то, что про вас говорят другие, когда вас нет рядом. Каждое ваше общение с друзьями / знакомыми = создает ваш личный бренд. Каждый известный блогер = сам создал свой сильный личный бренд. Даже если он никогда не думал о нём.
❤7
Знаете, что такое личный бренд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍3
🤔 Каких блогеров смотрит глухая молодежь? На форуме мы много общались с глухой молодёжью. И прямо на выступлении Елена задала им интересный вопрос. - Каких глухих блогеров смотрит глухая молодёжь? - И почему именно их? Ответы нас удивили. ↗️ Угадаете имена блогеров, которых назвала глухая молодежь? Ответы пишите в комментарии 🔜🔜 А в четверг мы выложим правильные ответы.
❤5👍1
«Услышать тишину» - спикер Форума глухой и слабослышащей молодёжи «Слушаю сердцем» в Хабаровске ⭐ В конце ноября Елена Максимова, основатель Первой в России школы глухих блогеров и главред журнала «Услышать тишину», выступила на форуме в Хабаровске с лекцией и мастер-классом на тему «Глухота как личный бренд: инструкция по применению». Больше часа Елена обучала глухую молодёжь как строить личный бренд. 🚀 На выступ…
❤5👍1
🫧 Стань преподавателем Школы глухих блогеров в 2026 году 🌟 Приглашаем экспертов из сфер 🌟 ➕ Работа с видео, визуалом и текстом: видеосъемка и монтаж, субтитры, СММ, копирайтинг, дизайн, оформление социальных сетей ➕ Заработок и продвижение через блог: маркетинг, продажи, реклама, продвижение и личный бренд, коллаборации ➕ Искусственный интеллект ➕ Актёрское мастерство ➕ Психология и коучинг ➕ Экспертный блогин…
👍7❤5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @topdeaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Телеграмм совсем заблокируют? Что думаете?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Знаете, что такое личный бренд?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какие ваши главные ошибки при съемке?
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 18 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 560,956 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Первая в России школа глухих блогеров” (@topdeaf), 2,448 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/topdeaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.