Channel
@top_otvivy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004375049231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @top_otvivy |
| Created | 19 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/top_otvivy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 5 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 5 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 19 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (19 September 2026 – 19 September 2026) |
| Views total | 713 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Оксана, после летнего канала сразу зашла в осенний. Очень удобный и доступный формат. Я ненавижу искать вещи и всегда мечтала,чтобы кто-то это сделал за меня. Вашему вкусу я доверяю уже больше двух лет😉☺️ Спасибо, что выбираете классные вещи для меня😍😀 Если бы вы сделали постоянный канал с вашими находками по подписке, я бы была очень рада.
Оксана, мне очень понравился летний канал с находками. Много чего купила по вашим советам, ношу с удовольствием уже второй месяц. Очень ждала такой же осенний, и как только увидела пост, без раздумий купила доступ. Уверена, что будет таким же полезным. Спасибо вам за ваш труд 🌷
Оксаночка, спасибо вам за каналы. Летний оценила, благодаря нему купила вещей на пару капсул. Успела все выгулять и буду носить с удовольствием в 27 году. Очень рада, что появился осенний канал, как увидела, сразу купила доступ. Постепенно собираю гардероб. Очень удобно.
Оксана, канал по вб для меня настоящее спасение, у меня нет столько времени, чтобы самой часами искать хорошие вещи и сравнивать варианты. Очень нравится сама идея такого формата, что всё собрано и отобранно в одном месте. Спасибо вам за ваш труд и вкус, и что делитесь им с нами 🌺
❤1
Благодаря каналу с находками купила много классных вещей, которые сама не нашла бы ни в жизнь. Очень полезно , спасибо за ваш труд 🙏
Ваши посты для меня - это всегда эстетическое удовольствие😍 , но часто не хватало ссылок. Канал по Вайлдберизу оказался просто концентратом таких ссылок, давно мечтала, чтобы за меня нашли классные вещи, а мне нужно было их лишь заказать 😊😁
Оксана, ваш канал - это то, чего мне всегда не хватало в ваших подборках - где купить эту красоту 😍😍😍
Давно слежу за вашей работой, поэтому пару дней назад присоединилась к каналу. Как же здорово, что не нужно ничего искать. В корзине уже с десяток вещей, бью себя по рукам, чтобы не скупить все. Жду зп 🙈
Оксана, канал очень удобный все понятно и вещи все красивые. И цены доступные. Спасибо вам за такую идею . Ещё хотелось бы увидеть подборку часов)
Оксана, спасибо,что делитесь находками в канале, уже заказала, померила и купила пляжное платье, сумку и юбку. Все подошло и понравилось🤩
Здравствуйте ))))) Залипла в канале вашем ))) очень крутая идея! Наблюдаю как вы легко (ну так кажется 🤭 знаю что это большой труд) выстраиваетесь в веяние времени и чувствуете потребности людей!
Добрый вечер. Мне хочется всё: домашняя одежда, бельё, спортивная одежда, кардиган (пиджак классно, но мне с детьми на площадке не погулять). А так мне безумно всё нравится, что уже есть в канале. Это прям то, что нужно. И то чего мне так сильно не хватало. И сама бы вряд-ли смогла такое найти. Не решилась бы на WB покупать. Можно ещё головные уборы: кепки, шляпы, платочки.
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @top_otvivy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Находки 2026 - отзывы” (@top_otvivy), 5 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/top_otvivy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.