Авторский канал Дмитрия Котова, пишу о всем связанном с 1С:Предприятием, ИИ, работой и жизнью 1Сника
По вопросам рекламы @kotovdima
Влог: https://t.me/VlogKotova
https://kotov.top
https://yellowpath.ru
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net +194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,494–8,746 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 23:07
8,717
+12
7 Nov 2026, 05:41
8,705
-1
4 Nov 2026, 03:11
8,706
+2
31 Oct 2026, 19:11
8,704
+7
28 Oct 2026, 23:56
8,697
+7
26 Oct 2026, 00:06
8,690
+6
23 Oct 2026, 10:36
8,684
+7
20 Oct 2026, 12:41
8,677
-2
17 Oct 2026, 04:31
8,679
-3
13 Oct 2026, 21:11
8,682
+8
8 Oct 2026, 11:59
8,674
+3
2 Oct 2026, 00:56
8,671
+26
16 Sept 2026, 18:20
8,645
+24
12 Sept 2026, 11:19
8,621
+17
8 Sept 2026, 10:17
8,604
+30
3 Sept 2026, 10:04
8,574
+1
31 Aug 2026, 07:14
8,573
+1
28 Aug 2026, 05:26
8,572
+4
25 Aug 2026, 03:33
8,568
+17
22 Aug 2026, 05:46
8,551
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 8,717 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,390
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
65 (23 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
40,230
Reactions total
681
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 00:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,390
Videos
≈82
Links
≈1,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 31s
Average length
3m 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,274 reactions across 58 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5260718163116433981
429
33.7%
custom 5327789179864630055
417
32.7%
custom 5190655512668027936
265
20.8%
custom 5298956256952754720
115
9.03%
custom 5352536716999699911
19
1.49%
custom 5213005925475956333
12
0.942%
custom 5359392842013760405
5
0.392%
custom 5359456270090788006
5
0.392%
custom 5193151318163732652
3
0.235%
custom 5327891902597446446
2
0.157%
custom 5330261461824455022
2
0.157%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,379 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 65 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @top_1c. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.08%
2 of 65 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,410
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,400
over 63 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvQoKwz
1
29 October 2026
29 October 2026
2W5zFJX9Mo7
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (31.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥 1С с нуля и бесплатно, новый курс
Ринат (канал Гайды по 1С) разработал свой курс «1С-разработчик с нуля»: в программе 40 уроков, от знакомства с платформой до собственного приложения учёта заявок. Пошаговая практика, код и тесты с разбором ошибок.
Будешь создавать справочники и документы, писать логику и запросы. Всё на одном учебном проекте.
👉 Посмотри первый урок. Он начинается с основ, предварительный опыт не…
Минск за три дня! 🇧🇾
Съездил не только ради драников :) Конечно, основной повод был открыть для себя новое место на карте, новую страну и побывать на далёкой родине моей бабушки.
Ну и, конечно, со своей активной жизненной позицией не мог не навести суету. Вместе с Артуром организовали «Кунг-фу Ужин» для 1Сников. Подробнее об этом уже писал - https://t.me/top_1c/2199. После ещё встретились на междусобойчик. Ещё заск…
🎙 У нас появился новый подкаст — 😄«Кодовое слово»
Про 1С, технологии и людей, которые автоматизируют бизнес. Будем приглашать разработчиков, аналитиков, РП и других экспертов разбирать рабочие задачи, делиться опытом и спорить о будущем профессии.
🤔Начинаем с вопроса: как 1Снику не остаться без работы в 2027 году из-за ИИ?
В первом выпуске Александр Свойкин, Гейдар Габриэлянц и Дмитрий Котов обсуждают с ведущим Се…
✌️ИИ забрал рутину. Почему мы стали уставать больше?
К новости о выходе FABLE 5.2.
Вроде всё складывалось отлично: нейросеть пишет код, помогает разбираться в чужом, собирает документацию. Работаем быстрее. По идее, должны меньше уставать и больше зарабатывать.
Но есть подвох. В первую очередь касается найма.
Допустим раньше 80% рабочего дня занимала знакомая рутина, а 20% приходилось на сложные задачи. Цифры усл…
😱 А что, если код 1С отдать под суд?
Мы с Алексеем Лапицким попробовали и сняли пилот «Суд над кодом»!
Алексей обвиняет, я защищаю. Заодно играю подсудимого и ГЛАВБУХШУ 😬😆 Нейросеть тоже будет, куда без неё. Вам знакомо: «Оно три года работало», тогда смотрите:
YouTube | Rutube | VK Видео | Boosty
Накидайте 🔥, если снимать продолжение!
А в комментариях пишите, как вам формат?
Tg | Max | YouTube | Рутуб | Boost…
🥔 Мой секретный рецепт драников 🇧🇾
Картошку тру крупно, идеально на тёрке для корейской морковки. Солю, хорошенько отжимаю. Добавляю чеснок, перец, пару ложек муки и одно яйцо. На сковороде расплющиваю тонко. Получаются фантастически хрустящие!
При подаче ещё щепотка соли эффектным жестом через локоть, ну вы поняли.
Попросил GPT посчитать домашние расходы и сравнить с минскими заведениями. Вот сколько стоят 100 гр…
Я в Беларуси! 🇧🇾
Вчера вместе с Артуром Коржаном (канал «1Сник») организовали и провели «Кунг-фу Ужин» в Минске. Собрались, познакомились, поговорили про 1С и не только.
У ребят огромный опыт, все заряженные, каждый со своей экспертизой и интересными историями. Как всегда, был рад увидеть Антона Титовца (автора канала OpenYellow и ОПИ).
Вышло максимально лампово, хоть я и прилично опоздал ❤️ - кто понял, тот понял…
Стримчевского не будет, отпуск захлестнул с головой!
Уже два дня не открывал Клод. Сам в шоке 😁
Сейчас в Питере. Успели сгонять в Петергоф буквально перед закрытием фонтанов.
А завтра уже в Минск!
Кому мало моих бесячих фоточек и хочется больше историй из моего движа, добро пожаловать в личный влог: https://t.me/VlogKotova
Когда меня спрашивали, какой ИИ выбрать, последнее время я отвечал: «Бери Клод». И добавлял: «Пока нам дают ездить на Феррари, надо ездить!»
Сейчас мою «Феррари» забрали. Перебираю варианты вернуть Клод и вспоминаю, как покупал свою первую машину. В 2009 году мне было 24. Я вырос с бабушкой в хрущёвке, о своей машине долго даже не мечтал. Всего за год до этого исполнил другую мечту: купил велосипед. А тут решился и …
custom 532778917986463005528
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @top_1c. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@top_1c edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Р1: Premium. Вакансии 1С для Синьоров @joboneC · 20,275 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дмитрий Котов | 1С Заметки” (@top_1c), 8,717 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/top_1c.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.