4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,189–7,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:54
7,190
-4
6 Aug 2026, 20:31
7,194
+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:16
7,192
no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:59
7,192
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.56%
avg views ÷ 7,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
616
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
14 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
8,620
Reactions total
107
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
80.2%
👍
7
8.64%
👏
5
6.17%
🔥
4
4.94%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
رنگ، بهمثابه رابطه
تأملی درباره سانزو وادا و «فرهنگ ترکیبهای رنگ»
شاید رنگ، آنگونه که معمولاً تصور میکنیم، چیزی نیست که در خودِ اشیا وجود داشته باشد. رنگ از جایی آغاز میشود که یک رنگ در کنار رنگ دیگری قرار میگیرد؛ جایی میان دو چیز، در فاصلهای که چشم آن را میسازد و ذهن آن را معنا میکند. از این منظر، رنگ نه یک صفت، بلکه یک رابطه است.
سانزو وادا، نقاش و پژوهشگر ژاپنی، در دهه ۱۹۳۰ کوشید همین …
▫️▫️▫️▫️
//…Edward Hopper…//
(American, 1882-1967)
Nighthawks (1942)
Oil on canvas, 84.1 x 152.4 cm.
The Art Institute of Chicago (Friends of American Art Collection)
▫️▫️▫️
در چهار دیوار نور
در «شبگردها» هیچ دری دیده نمیشود. این را بارها گفتهاند بیآنکه پیامدش را دنبال کنند: اگر دری نیست، این چهار نفر چگونه به اینجا رسیدهاند؟ شاید نیامدهاند. شاید همیشه بودهاند، محبوسِ همان مثلث نورانیای که هاپر آن را بزرگتر از واقعیتش کشیده نه یک دینر، که یک ویترین. ما از تاریکیِ خیابان به آنها نگاه میکنیم، همانطور که به نمونههای حشرهشناسی در پشت شیشه نگاه میکنند. آنها موضوع مشاه…
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
دربارهی نقاشیهای آلکس کالویل
آلکس کالویل با وسواسی تقریباً آیینی نقاشی میکرد. نخست با تمپرای تخممرغی و بعدها با اکریلیک، تصویر را نقطه به نقطه، خط به خط متقاطع میساخت، کاری که گاه ماهها به طول میانجامید. این کندی صرفاً یک روش تکنیکی نبود؛ خود به بخشی از معنای اثر بدل میشد — سکونی که در سطح تابلو نشسته، انگار زمان در آن متوقف شده باشد.
آثار او را میتوان در سنت رئالیسم جادویی یا پرسیژنیسم خوان…
▫️▫️
این عکسهای نلا تارانتینو نشان میدهند که چگونه عکاسی میتواند از یک ابزار صرفِ ثبت و مستندسازی فراتر رود و به آینهای برای امر نادیدنی تبدیل شود؛ امری که از خلال نور، حرکت و محوشدگی قابل کاوش است.
نادیدنی، همان لحظهای است که در حال گذر است. ذهن انسان واقعیت را به صورت جریانی پیوسته ادراک میکند، اما دوربین زمان را درست در همان لحظهای که از دست میگریزد، به دام میاندازد. محوشدگی، سوژه را از یک حضور فیزیکیِ …
🔺🔻
نبات | چای 🍃
هر چای یه قصه داره — از باغ تا فنجان شما.
اگر دوست دارید چای رو بهتر بشناسید، نبات میتونه همراهتون باشه.
در کنار این مطالب، چایهای باکیفیت و اصیل رو هم به شما معرفی میکنیم.
🍵 از چای روزمره تا چایهای خاص و دستچین
🌍 ارسال به سراسر ایران
🤝 مشاورهٔ رایگان
09010500110
09961117815
@mbarkadeh
لینک کانال بله:
👉 https://ble.ir/nabattea 👈
لینک کانال تلگرام:
👉 https://t.me/nabaattea 👈
بهترینها براتو…
▫️▫️▫️▫️▫️
برای شاعر؛ جهان، شعر نیست. شعر جهان است.
Selbstporträt in der Landschaft
~ Self-portrait in Landscape
by Hermann Scherer, 1924-1926
Oil on canvas
109 cm x 89 cm
Private collection
▫️▫️▫️
در آتلیه
آتلیه، پناهگاه هنرمند است؛ جایی که اندیشه، تجربه و آفرینش در آن شکل میگیرد. بسیاری از هنرمندان درهای آتلیههای خود را به روی عکاسان آژانس مگنوم گشودهاند و از این طریق، شیوههای خلاقه و جهان درونیشان را آشکار کردهاند.
نقاش و پیشگام مدرنیسم، Georgia O’Keeffe، در سال ۱۹۴۸ در کنار یکی از جمجمههای سفیدشدهی حیوانات که از عناصر شاخص آثارش بود، در برابر دوربین Philippe Halsman ایستاده است.
Alberto …
▫️▫️▫️
چاپ دوم رمان «آوازهای چند فیلسوار» منتشر شد.
نویسنده: آیدا مرادی آهنی
آوازهای چند فیلسوار رمانی است دربارهی شهر و عشق و، بیش از آن، داستان زندگی و زمانهی زنان است.
یکی از شخصیتها در فضای هنرهای تجسمی تهران دههی پنجاه معمایی را رقم میزند که دیگری در تهران سال ۱۳۹۸، سال آمدن پروانهها، به دنبال حل آن است. درعینحال، هر دو درگیر شهرند و درگیر عشق. شخصیت سوم، سرگردان بین قرنها، از ری تا شیراز و اصفهان…
▫️▫️▫️▫️
لانگ جینگشان؛ عکاسی در جستوجوی روح نقاشی چین
ورود عکاسی به چین در نیمهٔ قرن نوزدهم، همزمان با گسترش نفوذ غرب و گشوده شدن بنادر این کشور، تنها به معنای ورود یک فناوری تازه نبود؛ بلکه ورود شیوهای نو برای دیدن جهان بود. در آغاز، عکاسی عمدتاً در خدمت ثبت پرتره قرار داشت و زبان بصری آن از اروپا میآمد. با این حال، هنرمندان چینی خیلی زود دریافتند که اگر این رسانه قرار است بخشی از فرهنگ چین شود، باید از صرف ت…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tootim1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 732,574 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tootimag” (@tootim1), 7,190 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tootim1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.