Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tony channel

@tonychannle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,573subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001497712220
TypeChannel
Username@tonychannle
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonychannle

Growth

2,5732,5822,577.57 August 2026 — 2,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,582 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,577 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,573 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,572–2,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:252,573-4
10 Aug 2026, 08:112,577-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:432,582+3
7 Aug 2026, 06:152,579no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:072,579first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

373 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6617.7%
👏5514.7%
🔥5213.9%
🥰5213.9%
🎉4612.3%
👍4612.3%
🤩4311.5%
💩133.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 373reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 22 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2025, 15:09 UTCviews —

Tony channel pinned «原账号没了 这是新号:@tnjks888 ⚠️⚠️⚠️»

2 Jun 2025, 14:56 UTC≈1,900 viewsread 7 August 2026

原账号没了 这是新号:@tnjks888 ⚠️⚠️⚠️

28 May 2025, 04:10 UTC≈2,060 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Solvent Labs: A Solana and BNB native community coin rooted in fairness. We aim to create a widely traded liquid asset that is distributed to the masses restoring true token utility through big rewards, equality and transparency. The secret sauce lays in the game theory tokenomics. · The initial FDV is 166k on 3% supply in pool. · There is no pre-sale · There is no vesting · There are no whales · 97% of the supply

2

14 May 2025, 13:16 UTC≈1,100 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

好吗 回来第二天 推特被封了 马斯克我草泥马 明天就把特斯拉都卖掉

👏32

14 May 2025, 11:57 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 7 August 2026

我不玩 行情就不错 我一玩行情就冷静 建议大家众筹买我退网

14 May 2025, 02:00 UTCviews —

Tony channel pinned «山寨币季节指数升至31,市场显著回暖 BlockBeats 消息,5 月 14 日,据 Coinmarketcap 数据,市场显著回暖,山寨币季节指数(Altcoin Season Index)已由低点 13 升至 31,逐步接近 2 月均值 43 点。 山寨币指数在 2024 年 12 月 4 日创下年度高点 87,在过去 90 天内市值前 100 加密货币中有 31 种代币涨幅超越比特币,90 天表现居前的山寨币为 FORM、FARTCOIN、MKR、WIF、BREET。 原文链接 https:…»

14 May 2025, 02:00 UTC936 viewsread 7 August 2026

山寨币季节指数升至31,市场显著回暖 BlockBeats 消息,5 月 14 日,据 Coinmarketcap 数据,市场显著回暖,山寨币季节指数(Altcoin Season Index)已由低点 13 升至 31,逐步接近 2 月均值 43 点。 山寨币指数在 2024 年 12 月 4 日创下年度高点 87,在过去 90 天内市值前 100 加密货币中有 31 种代币涨幅超越比特币,90 天表现居前的山寨币为 FORM、FARTCOIN、MKR、WIF、BREET。 原文链接 https://m.theblockbeats.info/flash/293782 so 起床上班了

12 May 2025, 06:17 UTC645 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://app.binance.com/uni-qr/cart/24127599107410?r=38020188&l=zh-CN&uco=2neTbaDd9cxN9zUW2BJ_uQ&uc=app_square_share_link&us=copylink

7 May 2025, 16:26 UTC738 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

由于生活原因,我拍了个视频,给大家,欠的ama我下次一定补上,但是我确实是本人。

23 Apr 2025, 12:54 UTC880 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

分享一个合约必胜的办法 当总统

6👍6🔥6🎉5🥰4👏2🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tonychannle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 864,273 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tony channel” (@tonychannle), 2,573 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonychannle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.