Предмет сегодняшних споров – очки Fendi и кеды Premiata. А какая вещь улетела в ваш виш-лист последней?
❤10🔥5💔4

Channel
@tonkoshtuchka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
271subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002984135173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonkoshtuchka |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonkoshtuchka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:02 | 271 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 270 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 271 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 273 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 275 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 275 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 12.8% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 9.83% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 8.97% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 7.26% | |
| 💔 | 15 | 6.41% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 6.41% | |
| custom 5258044395650821454 | 9 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5190893758798906175 | 6 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5246893698477739020 | 5 | 2.14% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.14% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.427% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonkoshtuchka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 March 2026 to 22 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Предмет сегодняшних споров – очки Fendi и кеды Premiata. А какая вещь улетела в ваш виш-лист последней?
❤10🔥5💔4
Спонтанные встречи с сестрой на обед – это спорить, кто из нас двоих офигел больше: та, кто надела такую же куртку и кофту или та, кто пришла с новой сумкой. А еще: — Я не буду с тобой общаться, если ты купишь эти кеды! — Но я же с тобой общаюсь, а у тебя две пары, которых у меня нет. — Я не полечу с тобой в Сочи, у тебя новые очки, а мои сломались. — Ну так закажи себе, я нашла, которые тебе пойдут. — Не показывай…
🤣8💯6custom 52468936984777390205❤2
Настроение – нежность
❤12😍10💔6
Есть такое мнение, и я считаю нужным ответить. Чисто технически видео прекрасного качества, чтобы на нем можно было разглядеть детали. И да, для аутентификатора не составит труда даже по отрывкам из видео вычислить фейк. Сделать заключение об оригинальности-нет, потому что нужно изучать все детали, чтобы дать достоверное заключение. Но сказать, что эта LV с фото – фейк, который выдает одна из главных деталей (код), …
❤10👍5🔥4👀2
И только аутентификатор сразу считает количество фейков… Ответьте честно, есть такое ощущение, что на Парижских/ Европейских барахолках уж точно оригинальный винтаж?
custom 52580443956508214549custom 51908937587989061756❤5🤣2
Дорогая, желаю тебе самых умопомрачительных закатов и рассветов на Мальдивах, виллу с собственным бассейном и выходом к океану и самый внимательный сервис. Перешли подруге, чтобы сбылось🦪 P.S. и масику своему перешли, а то вдруг он не знает, что у Аэрофлота есть прямые рейсы до Мале
❤8😍7💔5🤣2😭1
У меня в ПВЗ недалеко от дома работает настоящий зумер. Такой мальчик с баклажановыми волосами и словарным запасом, состоящим из «нормис» и «слэй». Сегодня он забирает у меня заказ на возврат, не может разобраться некоторое время, произнося вслух «блин, да как же оно называется-то…». И через пару минут говорит мне, что я могу идти, а он тут сам разберется. Я вижу, что у меня в приложении есть код возврата, говорю, …
🔥14😁12🤣9❤2
Вы думали, не было утреннего поста, потому что я работаю? Правильно думали, работаю, а в перерывах нет-нет да и поглядываю на свое новое колечко. Знакомо чувство?
❤18😁11💯9
Это объявление – один сплошной рэд флаг. ❌Как вы правильно заметили, первое, что выдает - это цена. Но даже не цена, как таковая, а тот факт, что продавец очень хочет убедить нас, что покупка выгодная: «12 000$ на аукционах, а я отдаю почти за бесплатно» ❌«Винтаж 2018 г выпуска» – понимаем, что человек вообще не в теме и решил просто подзаработать на доверчивости модников и модниц. ❌И для продвинутых - «серийный н…
❤10👏8🔥7
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @tonkoshtuchka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Совет да Диор” (@tonkoshtuchka), 271 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonkoshtuchka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.