Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ton Famous People 💎

Channel

Ton Famous People 💎

@tonfamouspeople

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,461subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001961630589
TypeChannel
Username@tonfamouspeople
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tonfamouspeople

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4612,5352,4987 August 2026 — 2,535 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,535 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,529 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,521 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,518 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,514 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,512 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,503 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,499 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,493 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,486 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,480 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,465 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,461 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 41 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,450–2,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:152,461-4
14 Sept 2026, 03:002,465-15
10 Sept 2026, 12:412,480-6
5 Sept 2026, 14:562,486-7
1 Sept 2026, 23:192,493-6
30 Aug 2026, 08:142,499-4
27 Aug 2026, 17:272,503-9
24 Aug 2026, 22:372,512-2
21 Aug 2026, 13:232,514-4
18 Aug 2026, 05:332,518-3
14 Aug 2026, 19:362,521-8
11 Aug 2026, 07:182,529-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:452,533-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:162,535no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:072,535first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

95 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚3233.7%
🐳2728.4%
👀2425.3%
88.42%
🏆44.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 06:24 UTC381 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Так мы теперь Gram Famous People?! 🤔🤔🤔

🐳4👀2

23 Feb 2026, 16:59 UTC937 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Были анонимные - стали коллекционные. 🥲🥲🥲

🌚4🐳2👀1

6 Feb 2026, 10:51 UTC616 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Даже не знаю че сказать.. 🤷‍♂️ Меньше бакса увидим?)

🐳3🌚2👀1

20 Jan 2026, 07:08 UTC514 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gift_newstgPhoto

🎁Plush Pepe - лидер! 🏆Plush Pepe занимает 1 место по объему торгов среди всех NFT Plush Pepe — $6,1 млн Pudgy Penguins — $3,8 млн CryptoPunks — $2,6 млн BAYC — $2,4 млн Moonbirds — $1,6 млн Lil Pudgys — $1,4 млн GoodVibes Club — $1,29 млн MAYC — $1,28 млн Mocaverse — $790 тыс Nakamigos — $780 тыс Источник - @TON_Cabal Gift News🎁 Portals ❤️ Buy/sell Gifts🥈 Floorprice📊

🏆41🐳1

20 Jan 2026, 07:08 UTC428 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Даже панков обогнали, уровень.. 🤔

👀31🐳1

30 Nov 2025, 21:20 UTC512 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🐣 It happened. Our decentralized confidential compute network, Cocoon, is live. The first AI requests from users are now being processed by Cocoon with 100% confidentiality. GPU owners are already earning TON. https://cocoon.org is up, with docs and the source code. 🤔 Centralized compute providers such as Amazon and Microsoft act as expensive intermediaries that drive up prices and reduce privacy. Cocoon solves both

👀52🌚2

22 Nov 2025, 19:49 UTC521 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Папахи мы так же пропускаем.. 🚽

🐳4🌚2👀2

16 Nov 2025, 07:25 UTC554 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, я все проспал.. 🫠

🐳5🌚4👀3

11 Nov 2025, 15:52 UTC572 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы заметили как в моменте появилось кучу разных «анонимных е-симок» обернутых в NFT?!) Деньги просто из воздуха делают.. гои в тоне не переведутся. 🤣🤣🤣

🌚43🐳3👀1

10 Oct 2025, 21:36 UTC552 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Трамп ввел 100% пошлины и хорошенько перезагрузил ликву в рынке. Завидую тем, кто пользуется лимитной торговлей и раскидывал заявки… 0.6 по тону, кто бы мог подумать? 🍸🍸🍸

🌚5👀2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tonfamouspeople. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CLT_News
@starstonchain · 93,291
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 21 August 2026
NEURO CRYPTO | Нейрокрипто
@RedList_NFT · 26,519
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
Хомяк с TON’а
@homyak_s_tona · 24,481
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
CRYPTO GUYS 👽| 😼
@TonGuysNFT · 27,128
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ton Famous People 💎” (@tonfamouspeople), 2,461 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonfamouspeople.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.