📊 Perp-DEX Monopoly: Hyperliquid’s July Volume Hits $218B, Outpacing Top 7 Competitors Combined! 🚀 Decentralized derivatives liquidity is concentrating at an unprecedented pace! In a massive display of market dominance, decentralized perpetual exchange Hyperliquid recorded an astronomical $218 billion in trading volume throughout July 2026. To put that sheer scale into perspective, Hyperliquid’s monthly volume comf…

Channel
Crypto News & Web3 Events | TON Ecosystem
@tonevents_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
299,791subscribers
-4,363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002113687952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonevents_en |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonevents_en |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 299,791 | -632 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 300,423 | -372 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 300,795 | -480 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 301,275 | -334 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 301,609 | -396 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 302,005 | -408 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 302,413 | -506 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 302,919 | -545 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 303,464 | -281 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 303,745 | -409 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:20 | 304,154 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 304,154 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.7%
- avg views ÷ 299,791 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35,000
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.43%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 279,600 |
| Reactions total | 4,003 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🍿 Regulatory Clash: New York Sues Kalshi for $36B Over Alleged "Illegal Gambling" Operations! 📉🗽 The legal war between state regulators and prediction markets has officially erupted! The State of New York—led by Governor Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James—has filed a massive $36 billion lawsuit against prediction market giant Kalshi. The state accuses the platform of operating an unlicensed, illegal mo…
✈️ Sky-High Adoption: UAE’s Emirates Airline Launches Crypto Payments for Flight Bookings! 🇦🇪🎟 Massive real-world crypto adoption is taking off! The flagship carrier of the UAE, Emirates Airline, has officially launched cryptocurrency payment options directly on its official website and mobile app. Through an official integration with Crypto.com Pay, travelers can now seamlessly pay for their flights using digital …
🏆 DFARIO CONTEST IS ALREADY AT THE FINISH LINE! ⏳Time is running out, and 30% of all monthly spendings are already forming the prize pool for the TOP-10 players. 💰 The prize pool has already exceeded 53,500 $DF and continues to grow! 🔥 Every completed level can bring you closer to the reward. Don't miss your chance to join the best players of Dmitriy's Friends! 🚀 Play now. Climb to the TOP. Claim your share of the …
🚨 WEMIX Smart Contract Exploit: $6.25M Drained as Hackers Mint 5.23M Tokens! ⚠️ The Web3 gaming sector has been hit with another major security breach! Major South Korean blockchain platform WEMIX (backed by gaming giant Wemade) suffered a critical smart contract exploit resulting in an estimated loss of $6.25 million. The attacker successfully compromised smart contract ownership controls, allowing them to illegal…
🏛 Institutional Onboarding Unleashed: Ripple Launches "Ripple Mint" Platform for RLUSD! The institutional stablecoin war is escalating to brand-new heights! Ripple has officially introduced Ripple Mint—a specialized enterprise platform designed to streamline the institutional adoption, issuance, and lifecycle management of its regulated fiat-backed stablecoin, RLUSD (Ripple USD). Through a unified, enterprise-grade…
🪙 Tether’s $180B Dilemma: USDT Faces 2-Year Deadline Under US GENIUS Act! The world’s largest stablecoin is officially on a regulatory countdown clock! Following its gradual retreat from the regulated European market due to MiCA compliance hurdles, Tether’s USDT is now facing intense, formal pressure inside the United States. Under the provisions of the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U…
🇺🇸 Next-Level Insider Trading: Trump’s Teleprompter Operator Cleared $100,000 Betting on Presidential Speeches! The prediction markets industry has just hit one of its most bizarre and high-profile scandals yet. Gabriel Perez, a longtime teleprompter operator for Donald Trump since the 2016 campaign, has been suspended and is currently under investigation by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Lev…
🚨 On-Chain Warning: US Government Moves Massive $297 Million Seized Crypto to Coinbase Prime! Uncle Sam is shuffling his digital treasury, and the entire market is on high alert! On-chain monitoring tools have just detected a series of massive cryptocurrency transfers originating from wallets officially managed by the United States government, signaling a significant consolidation of seized assets. According to blo…
🇧🇴The Stablecoin Solution: Bolivia Evaluates Integrating USDT Into National Payment System! Sovereign adoption of digital fiat is shifting into high gear across Latin America! In a historical move to combat a persistent physical U.S. dollar shortage and stabilize localized trade friction, the government of Bolivia has officially confirmed that it is technically evaluating the integration of the USDT stablecoin direc…
💥 The AI Sovereignty Debate: Vitalik Buterin Outlines the Dual-Path Dilemma for Artificial Intelligence! The foundational philosophies of tech and Web3 are colliding! Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has weighed in on the accelerating global debate surrounding Artificial Intelligence regulation, pointing out that the current split between AI accelerationists and safety doomers stems from a fundamental disagreemen…
🇰🇿 Central Asian Crypto Hub: Kazakhstan Unveils Massive Regulatory Overhaul and Tax Exemptions! The global race for regulatory clarity has a new frontrunner! The President of Kazakhstan, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, has officially signed a ground-breaking decree aimed at transforming the country's digital asset landscape. Instead of imposing restrictive bans, the government is completely integrating crypto into its offici…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonevents_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 816,784 of 1,481,277entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto News & Web3 Events | TON Ecosystem” (@tonevents_en), 299,791 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonevents_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.