🚀 Rocket-чек на 92.5 GRAM (134.0$) Внутри чека: 3700 активация(й) по 0.02 GRAM (0.03$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 GRAM (0.007$)
❤3

Channel
@tonchequesss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21,787subscribers
-207 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001932224476 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tonchequesss |
| Description | ❤Чатик ФАЕРОВ❤: https://t.me/Ton_4aT • • • • • • • • • • • • Владелец: @igor_777_igor_228 По вопросам писать ему: 👉 @igor_777_igor_228 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tonchequesss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 21,787 | -37 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 21,824 | -27 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:56 | 21,851 | -38 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 21,889 | -24 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 21,913 | -34 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 21,947 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 21,970 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 21,994 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 21,994 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 February 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 511 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
79 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 68.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 25.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Rocket-чек на 92.5 GRAM (134.0$) Внутри чека: 3700 активация(й) по 0.02 GRAM (0.03$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 GRAM (0.007$)
❤3
🚀 Rocket-чек на 973.75 DFC (121.7$) Внутри чека: 3895 активация(й) по 0.2 DFC (0.03$) с реферальной наградой 0.05 DFC (0.006$)
❤2
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 4000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 🤖 Beep AI - By Sui Foundation 🏆 $500,000 BEEP Rewards Join the World Cup Prediction Arena on Galxe and start earning rewards. 🔗 Register: https://app.justbeep.it?ref=eh_ty2kmlx 🔗 Galxe Campaign: https://app.galxe.com/quest/BeepAI_labs/GC8h8tZYWa ⭐ Why Join? • Earn Beep Points acros…
❤3
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 4000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 @betty sent you 🪙 500 USDT ($500) @betty is a collection of emoji-based mini-games played with USDT Games for every taste — 🎲 ⚽️ 🏀 🎯 🎳 🎰 💣 Fairness guaranteed—the outcome of each round is determined on the Telegram server
❤3
🚀 Rocket-чек на 63.7375 GRAM (115.9$) Внутри чека: 5099 активация(й) по 0.01 GRAM (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.0025 GRAM (0.005$) 💬 🎮 Добавь Поигрульки в свой чат Запускай мини-игры, собирай участников и играй со своими подписчиками прямо в Telegram. Больше активности, больше общения, больше движухи в чате. @xrockgame_bot
❤3
🚀 Rocket-чек на 1250 TAKE (1 836.5$) Внутри чека: 100000 активация(й) по 0.01 TAKE (0.01$) с реферальной наградой 0.0025 TAKE (0.004$) 💬 🥰 @TonTakeGarants - чат товаров и услуг 😎 @tontakeotc - чат товаров и услуг БЕЗ БОТОВ
❤2👍2🥰1
🚀 Rocket-чек на 329.125 USDT (329.1$) Внутри чека: 13165 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 💸 Do you want to make money by creating accounts? Earn $0.17 for registering each account! 🚀Just launch the bot and start earning right now 👉 https://t.me/GmailFarmerBot?start=7163576641 And if you want to buy Gmail accounts 🤜 @USDT_GangStar_bot
❤3👍2
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 4000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 @casinopanda - игровая платформа на основе Xrocket с наградами до 1000Х. Играй и побеждай!
👍4❤3
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 4000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 MELL GIFTS Get a free balance of up to 1 Ton by completing simple tasks Link: http://t.me/mellgifts_bot/app?startapp=v0bGiIt4 Complete tasks to earn Ton Play until you get a gift Withdraw instantly For airdrop information, visit https://t.me/AirdropNimbrung
❤2👍1🥰1
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 1000 активация(й) по 0.1 USDT (0.1$) 💬 💬 Dirty WIN на связи💬 Устраиваем конкурсы в чате. Ещё не с нами? Много теряешь! 😏 Бонус на баланс, конкурсы с подарками, общение с игроками?💵🎁📞 Всё тут. Игроки которые зашли вовремя, уже получили свои первые подгоны. Не пропускай важную инфу. @Dirty_W1N_bot
❤4👍3🥰1
🚀 Rocket-чек на 50 USDT (50.0$) Внутри чека: 2500 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) 💬 Добро пожаловать в 💎 Training Camp TON
❤5
🚀 Rocket-чек на 101 USDT (101.0$) Внутри чека: 505 активация(й) по 0.1 USDT (0.1$) с реферальной наградой 0.1 USDT (0.1$) 💬 даю по 0.5$ каждому кто закинет голоса 👇 https://t.me/boost?c=2129853604 t.me/+tpwDtnpg4ogwY2E0
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonchequesss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,000,531 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tonchequesss named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON” (@tonchequesss), 21,787 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonchequesss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.