9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,105–12,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 11:43
12,119
-14
11 Aug 2026, 14:22
12,133
-10
10 Aug 2026, 17:01
12,143
-15
9 Aug 2026, 14:11
12,158
-16
8 Aug 2026, 12:35
12,174
-18
7 Aug 2026, 14:14
12,192
-11
6 Aug 2026, 16:17
12,203
-9
6 Aug 2026, 02:34
12,212
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:01
12,212
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Videos
3
Links
15
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 26s
Average length
2m 09s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,987 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
893
44.9%
🔥
511
25.7%
❤
347
17.5%
👏
164
8.25%
😁
72
3.62%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,987reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2024 to 8 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 17 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tonalyticsapp. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2024 to 8 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
We’re partnering with ONTON to support Genesis ONIONs NFTs. The biggest 2025 NFT launch on TON is here
Mint your way to the $ONION airdrop, ONTON’s native token launching soon.
How it works:
👀 Visit the Minting App 👉 @theontonbot
⌛️ Pay 5 TON to spin
✨ Unwrap Gold, Silver, and Bronze Genesis ONION NFTs
👑 Collect sets of Gold, Silver, and Bronze to boost your airdrop multiplier
All holders of Genesis ONIONs will g…
Tonalytics — Grand Plans for 2025 📈
The idea to create Tonalytics emerged in the spring of 2024. It all began not with an idea, but with a need. We wanted to put everything essential for asset monitoring into one mini-app without overloading it with excessive functionality.
Throughout this year, Tonalytics has rapidly developed and been enriched with various options.
Let's summarize the past year 🎄🎄🎄
🥇We took fir…
Tonalytics SBT on TON Society 📈
Just a few simple tasks to participate in the SBT campaign by TON Society
Now Tonalytics on @tbook_incentive_bot
Participate in SBT campaign — your chance to get Degen Airdrop!
Let's go! 📈
———
Try Tonalytics Now 📈
Tonalytics на русском: @tonalytics1
Would you be interested in reading about the Tonalytics team, new projects, and various interesting things from the world of analytics and whales in TON? No spam, of course. Only useful information. 📈
Yes, I’m interested in learning new things!90%
No, only the news10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Friends! Your opinion matters. 📈
We have a lot going on; recently, we rolled out a major update, launched a new fun project, and are preparing to launch a newly created game as part of a new winter hackathon.
With this in mind, we want to know your opinion. Should we keep this channel purely informational, or would you enjoy reading about the Tonalytics team, new projects, and various things from the world of analy…
Tonalytics 2.0 — Time for Major Updates!📈
Today, we are taking an important step towards the TON community by removing the paid plan — now the spy mode and many new options are available to all users.
What's new?
DeFi Analytics — a long-awaited feature that you have been asking for! Your assets in liquidity pools, farming, staking, and lending protocols. We already track assets in STON fi, DeDust, and EVAA Protoco…
The Open League Season 6 has begun!
You can now start farming Normie and Degen airdrops, with a total sum of $1.2 million in Toncoin until October 10th! To participate in the Airdrop as a Tonalytics user, you need to:
1️⃣Get the Normie Badge
You need to get the Normie Badge from TON Society. If you do not receive the Badge, your activity will not be counted.
2️⃣Use Tonalytics
Use Tonalytics and other ecosystem app…
🔥🔥🔥 🏁 The Open League Hackathon is over!
We are proud to be among the top 24 projects out of nearly 1000 projects worldwide (top 8 in our category). We are preparing many new updates (pool analytics, evaa finance, PnL calculation, and much more) and are excited to announce a special sale.
1 Year: 10 TON instead of 16 TON (or 4990 Stars instead of 7990 Stars)
1 Month: 2 TON instead of 3 TON (or 990 Stars instead of …
Only 1 day left until the results of The Open League Hackathon 📈
Tomorrow we will find out if we managed to secure one of the top three prizes.
Check out our final pitch for the judges from the TON Foundation.
It's so challenging to showcase the vast number of features of our app in just 2 minutes, but it seems we did it!
Awaiting the results 📈
———
Try Tonalytics Now 📈
Tonalytics на русском: @tonalytics1
Only 2 days left until the results of The Open League Hackathon 📈
We remind you that Tonalytics is participating in the global hackathon by TON Foundation. Out of 961 projects, we and 23 other projects have made it to the finals. We are in the DeFi category, where we will compete for one of the three prize places with 7 other projects.
In the meantime, you can keep your fingers crossed for us and watch the video pr…
Your Assets in NFT Collections📈
You probably have several NFTs, maybe even a whole collection. But do you know how much of your money is stored in NFTs? We have developed our own calculation algorithm to keep you informed about how much TON you have in tokens and NFTs. On the main screen, there are two sections displaying your balances.
Here's how it works — Tonalytics scans all your NFTs in the background, taking …
Spy Mode 📈
In addition to monitoring your own assets and market changes, you can add any wallet on the TON blockchain for tracking.
Why?
Firstly, you can observe assets in the same interface as your personal wallet. You can see the total balance in TON, the minimum possible Floor in NFT collections, and also monitor operations, including those initiated by the wallet. This is convenient if you want to check out a …
👍9😁4❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tonalyticsapp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Would you be interested in reading about the Tonalytics team, new projects, and various interesting things from the world of analytics and whales in TON? No spam, of course. Only useful information. 📈
Yes, I’m interested in learning new things!90%
No, only the news10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2024 to 8 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 550,161 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tonalytics News | EN” (@tonalyticsapp), 12,119 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tonalyticsapp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
