Live stream finished (6 hours)

Channel
TON Отпечатки
@ton_fingerprints_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
323subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001724237319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ton_fingerprints_ru |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 7 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ton_fingerprints_ru |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 323 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 324 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 324 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
141 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 46 | 32.6% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 26.2% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5350320002773818225 | 14 | 9.93% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.26% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 2.13% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.13% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 2.13% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 2.13% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.42% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.42% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.42% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.709% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.709% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2022 to 30 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
- Most on one post
- 14
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ton_fingerprints_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2022 to 30 May 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Live stream started
Live stream scheduled for May 30, 2024 at 10:00
🔍 В новой статье мы рассматриваем выборку из дискретного распределения и алгоритм взвешенных случайных чисел в сканере Отпечатков! В Telegram App Fingerprint Scanner, каждый отпечаток имеет свой «вес» или вероятность быть выбранным. Алгоритм взвешенного случайного выбора, используемый в приложении — это метод выбора элементов из этой коллекции в соответствии с их весами, что, по сути, дает элементам с более высоким …
custom 535032000277381822514🔥5👍4❤3🍾1👏1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
🎉 Web App бот Fingerprint Scanner используют более 5000 пользователей в Telegram! 🎉 Мы рады сообщить, что после размещения в каталоге приложений Telegram Apps Center, приложение, основанное на NFT коллекции с открытой лицензией CC0, стало популярным среди пользователей. С помощью сканера ваша задача распознать и собрать отпечатки пальцев, чтобы получить максимальное количество игровых ресурсов. В отличие от кликеро…
👏4🔥2❤1🦄1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
🌟 Расширение Getgems Fingerprints 🌟 Мы рады объявить о запуске расширения для браузера, которое позволит вам увидеть атрибуты редкости NFT коллекции TON Fingerprints прямо на маркетплейсе Getgems! Теперь вы сможете легко определить ценность и уникальность каждого отпечатка, просматривая его характеристики прямо в своем браузере. Теперь на вашем экране будет отображаться индекс редкости, рекомендуемая розничная цена …
🔥8❤4⚡2🎉1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
TON Отпечатки pinned a photo
Сканер отпечатков пальцев добавлен в центр приложений Telegram ♥️ Спасибо команде Telegram Apps за ваше доверие. Найдите нас среди самых крутых приложений в Telegram! 🙏 Telegram Apps - управляемый сообществом каталог приложений, разработанных сторонними разработчиками.
🔥11🍾2🎉2👏1😱1🙏1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
Завтра начнется первое голосование по формированию будущего коллекции TON Fingerprints Отдать свой голос может каждый держатель NFT TON Fingerprints. В этом голосовании предлагается поддержка стратегии взвешенного баланса, при которой учитывается баланс голосующего на дату снимка. Чем больше количество NFT Fingerprints, тем больше право голоса. Хотя этот подход логичен, поскольку он дает больше влияния тем, у кого …
🔥10❤6🐳3🤔2😱2🤝1🙏1
Signed Donation Post
📟Read commit on Github: It is necessary that virtual environments are open, accessible and safe for everyone. This is of paramount importance for the appearance of the metaverse in The Open Network. The term "metaverse" is used to describe augmented reality. This is a signal of a significant change in how people think about the future of online communications. With today's technological advances and the increase in…
👍5
Signed Roman Inozemtsev
Во время подготовки к TON CON 2022 разрабатывалась токеномика с возможностью развертывания группы AMM-контрактов. После деплоя, оказалось, что эксплореры в сети TON отображают контракты, отличные от стандартных, как неверифицируемые. Неизменяемость смарт-контракта после публикации в блокчейне позволяет участникам бизнес-процесса «верить» в его «честность» - все возможные действия, а также уже совершенные транзакции …
👍8❤1🔥1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
Друзья, продолжаем рассказывать о команде, которая трудилась над организацией TON CON 2022! Roman Inozemtsev - Core Team DAO TON CON, Co-founder TON CON, Owner-Co-founder TON Fingerprints, Owner - MIR | Machine Intelligence Research. Какой вклад сделал в TON CON: - Документация, программные документы, правила, положения по участию, шаблоны анкет участников, экономика. - Токеномика, ролевая архитектура сообщества, …
👍9❤1🔥1
Signed TON Fingerprints Post
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ton_fingerprints_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 803,863 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ton_fingerprints_ru named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON Отпечатки” (@ton_fingerprints_ru), 323 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ton_fingerprints_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.