Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Том Йорки: маркетинг и любовь

@tomyorky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,601subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001512916299
TypeChannel
Username@tomyorky
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tomyorky

Growth

2,5982,6012,599.57 August 2026 — 2,600 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,598 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,599 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,601 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,598–2,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:462,601+2
11 Aug 2026, 01:242,599+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:102,598-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:462,600first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 2,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
503
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held7 (16 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,524
Reactions total159
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3924.5%
custom 52940573657153141072113.2%
custom 53751357225146855012113.2%
🔥1911.9%
custom 52200856421925006061610.1%
❤‍🔥148.81%
💯106.29%
😁85.03%
🦄42.52%
👍31.89%
👏21.26%
👌10.629%
🥰10.629%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC167 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Алла Билбордовна вернулась со всех командировок в родные пенаты и посмотрела что у вас здесь происходит. Как обычно: кого-то хвалит, кого-то не очень. Другого не дано. Смотрите обзор, ставьте лайк и отправляйте коллегам. А ещё, не забудьте подписаться на наш МАХ.

7custom 53751357225146855013🔥2👍1custom 52940573657153141071

29 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC493 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Что сейчас интересного происходит в Екатеринбурге? Хотя стойте, не говорите. Приедем и сами узнаем. Ведь 12 августа мы будем у вас! Ура! 😆 Приезжаем не с пустыми руками, а с квартирником. Всё, как и прежде: интересные лекции, умные люди вокруг, вкусный фуршет и полезные контакты. Дата и время: 12.08 в 17:00 Место: ул.Вайнера, д16, 2 этаж, «Домна». Стоимость участия: 900₽, чтобы приобрести пишите @yana_tomyorky

custom 52940573657153141076custom 52200856421925006063custom 537513572251468550131

23 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC512 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы не знали, мы сомелье по Билбордам. У нас скопилась достойная коллекция наружки и на примере некоторых макетов, мы вам сегодня расскажем про 7 ошибок в наружной рекламе. Кто подпишется на МАХ - у того всё будет класс!

13custom 53751357225146855017custom 52940573657153141075👍1👏1

22 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC523 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Надеемся, в этот раз организаторы подготовили достаточно собачек из оргстекла. Потому что мы рассчитываем на золото.

😁8💯6custom 53751357225146855015👍1

21 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTC542 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мы подали 3 работы на премию WOW Awards. И все три работы вошли в шорт-лист 😆 Что? Вам интересно какие именно работы и какие номинации? А вот же они: 1. Ребрендинг объекта: ЖК «Знак» 2. Буклет бизнес-класса: «Дом 10 на Горького» 3. Наружная реклама, статика: «Это Знак!»

❤‍🔥14custom 52200856421925006066custom 529405736571531410742👌1👏1

17 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC721 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как быть интересным? Проблема коммуникаций в девелопменте в том, что всё одинаковое. И это просто не работает. А сейчас особенно важно, чтобы работало. Ритм города, собственный ритм, гармония с природой, новый уровень комфорта... Эти слова можно бесконечно переставлять местами — получится то же масляное масло. Как быть другим? На эту тему можно говорить долго. Но по большому счёту нужно сделать две вещи. Первое —

🔥10custom 52200856421925006065💯4custom 529405736571531410732

16 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC566 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Школьные годы — это время, когда дети отчаянно пытаются понять и показать себя, но сталкиваются с жесткими рамками школьной системы. Их протест уходит в мелочи: розовые волосы, необычные шнурки или значки на сумках — так они спасают свою индивидуальность. Каждый ребёнок — это индивидуальный бунт самовыражения. Даже в школьной форме. Мы взяли этот инсайт за основу и разработали брендинг для бренда школьной одежды «ЮН

14🔥7🦄4custom 53751357225146855013custom 52200856421925006062custom 52940573657153141072🥰1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @tomyorky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,046,118 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Корнеев | Первый Маркетинговый
@pervmarketing · 139,945
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Том Йорки: маркетинг и любовь” (@tomyorky), 2,601 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomyorky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.