5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,485–1,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:05
1,487
+1
14 Aug 2026, 08:05
1,486
-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:41
1,488
+2
7 Aug 2026, 12:38
1,486
+1
7 Aug 2026, 07:31
1,485
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.8%
avg views ÷ 1,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
12 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
5,132
Reactions total
167
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
167 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😡
39
23.4%
🤯
30
18.0%
👍
29
17.4%
😢
17
10.2%
🤡
12
7.19%
❤
11
6.59%
😁
11
6.59%
🤔
8
4.79%
custom 5253751038967571476
7
4.19%
👎
3
1.80%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰Отсутствие финансирования помешало обособить трамвайные пути на улице Розы Люксембург
Из-за дефицита светлых новостей, «Томская маршрутка» иногда принимает желаемое за действительное. Пост об обособлении трамвайных путей на Розочке – яркий тому пример.
Наши читатели оказались правы, и бордюр предназначается для укладки плитки между рельсами и асфальтом, что совершенно не отделяет их друг от друга физически.
Отвеч…
🚫Трамвай сошёл с путей на кольце Батенькова днём в четверг
В принципе, на новости о трамваях, сошедших с путей, можно уже и не обращать внимания.
Это не новость – это повседневность. Новость будет тогда, когда они перестанут это делать с завидной регулярностью.
Фото: Никита Гольцов, РИА «Томск»
🏳С 15 августа все рейсы автобуса №112 в Северный Парк будут осуществляться через Левобережный
ООО «ЕТВ» по итогам торгов дептранса продлило до 2029 года право возить томичей по пригородному маршруту №112 в Дзержинское, Северный Парк, Борики и в Левобережный.
Вместе со свежим контрактом, с 15 августа вводится новое расписание. Теперь все автобусы №112С будут ездить в Северный Парк через Левобережный. Ранее они заезж…
🚫Раскопка мешает пассажирским автобусам выезжать из парка
Рытьё всего и вся без контроля и сжатых сроков – стихийное бедствие Томска
Телеграм-канал «Милый Томск» опубликовал видеозапись от читателя. Как утверждает автор, «Газпром» перекопал единственную дорогу, ведущую к одному из автопарков, что мешает выезду автобусов.
«Ограждения не поставили. Когда закопают, и закопают ли вообще, никому не известно!», – сообща…
🏳Созданная 3D-принтером остановка «ТГАСУ» обрела завершенный облик
Благоустройство остановки «ТГАСУ» завершено. Напомним, это первая в России остановка, созданная с применением строительной 3D-печати бетоном. На конструкцию потрачено 2,5 миллиона рублей.
Как пишет РИА «Томск» со ссылкой на соруководителя сети живых лабораторий «Студгородок», за полгода эксплуатации бетонные элементы успешно выдержали и морозы, и ле…
Мэрия прокомментировала ситуацию. Спросили про помидоры, ответили про огурцы. При чём тут низкопольные автобусы, когда речь идёт о средней и малой вместительности?
Цитируем: Задача муниципалитета - создать равные условия для всех перевозчиков, независимо от того, кто какой парк имеет на настоящий момент. При этом наличие дополнительных низкопольных автобусов являются критерием конкурса, который даёт дополнительные б…
⚡️Городские власти думают над увеличением доли типичных «ПАЗиков» в автобусных перевозках
Вперед в прошлое или удивительные дела в нашем королевстве
Подобно тому, как в пятницу над Томском пронёсся внезапный ливень с грозой, как гром среди ясного неба стала развиваться и другая история, которая, кроме как нецензурных слов, не вызывает ничего иного.
Транспортная ассоциация томской агломерации обратилась с письмом к…
🚫Количество рейсов автобуса №131 сократится с сентября
А точнее, документы приведут в соответствии с фактом
Пассажиров из томского пригорода продолжают испытывать на прочность. С августа сокращается количество рейсов по маршруту №510, а очередная оптимизация коснётся автобуса №131, о котором мы много раз писали.
С сентября по маршруту станут ездить всего 4 машины вместо 26, как было когда-то. О городской его части…
🔥Ремонт путей на Советской завершён, работа всех трамвайных маршрутов восстановлена
Специалисты ТТУ завершили ремонт небольшого участка трамвайных путей на Советской (фото 1), в четверг маршруты №1, 2, 3 и 5 возобновили работу.
Надо признаться, мы наивно думали, что полотно заменят в обоих направлениях. Но, по нечётной стороне Советской остались всё те же, видавшие виды рельсы (фото 2).
Кстати, сегодня около 8 час…
❔ Служба приёма вопросов работает в томском троллейбусе
Минутка юмора и #голоспассажира
Не знаете ответ на тот или иной вопрос и нейросети тоже? Все вопросы к кондуктору! Вы бы, например, о чём спросили? 😉
👌Наш телеграм-канал
👌Наша группа в ВК
📌Томское УФАС признало жалобу на конкурс по трём автобусным маршрутам из Северска и Томска необоснованной
Ранее мы рассказывали, что ООО «Арабис» пожаловалось в УФАС на конкурс областного дептранса по выбору перевозчика на маршрутах №101 (Томск – Эушта), №401 (Северск – Позднеево) и №514 (Северск – Камень).
Претензии заключались в условии конкурса: автобусы, используемые на линии, должны быть оборудованы двигателям…
👍8🤔8❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tomsk_bus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 537,663 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Томская маршрутка” (@tomsk_bus), 1,487 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomsk_bus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.