Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Montalk - Transcending the Matrix Control System

@tommontalk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,186subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001247171910
TypeChannel
Username@tommontalk
Created16 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tommontalk

Growth

3,1863,1893,187.56 August 2026 — 3,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,186 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,189 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,186 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,186–3,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:283,186-3
10 Aug 2026, 02:213,189+3
6 Aug 2026, 23:153,186no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:043,186first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 3,186 subscribers
Avg views / post
845
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (24 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total5,070
Reactions total219
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

552 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
32358.5%
👍7814.1%
🙏509.06%
🔥437.79%
173.08%
👏152.72%
❤‍🔥50.906%
😴50.906%
👀30.543%
🕊30.543%
🙊30.543%
🌚10.181%
🍓10.181%
💘10.181%
🤓10.181%
🤔10.181%
🤡10.181%
🤯10.181%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 552reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 06:49 UTC707 views66 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I just finished reading “The Cloud Upon the Sanctuary” (1793) by Karl von Eckartshausen. This slim book consists of six spiritual letters by Eckartshausen on (genuine!) Christian Mysticism. Here’s the full text of Eckartshausen’s book: https://sacred-texts.com/eso/cuts/index.htm Be sure to read the last letter, because he goes into specific detail (using Christian verbiage) of what’s required to elevate Man out of

41👍10🙏10🙊32

Signed Montalk

29 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC657 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(...continued) And remember that by incarnating here, there’s already an implicit agreement made with physics & etherics, where until we transfigure the physical & etheric bodies to put them under complete control of spirit, these are still subject to the mechanistic laws of their respective planes. Hence even if our human mind doesn’t want to age, get ill, burn fingers if touching a hot stove, starve if not eating

16👍113

Signed Montalk

29 Jul 2026, 18:46 UTC577 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

“Permission” or “agreement” influences our degree of interactibility with occult & NHI forces: how obvious, tangible, frequent, forceful, physical, and real (to you) they are. Two main factors gate the interaction: 1. Protector forces. Beings watching over you personally, for good or bad. They keep/protect you from having certain experiences. This is the “managed reality” previously mentioned. A skeptic or casual r

👍9🙏43

Signed Montalk

26 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC929 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Bhagavad Gita says it’s better to perform your own dharma (destined purpose) imperfectly than to perform another’s dharma perfectly. Part of knowing yourself is knowing what you’re built for, cut out for, born for, hence came here for. The more you align with that, the less internal resistance, greater conviction, and more external serendipity you’ll have. While we’re all unique in our granular reasons for bei

33👍5👏5🔥43🙏2🤓1

Signed Montalk

17 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈1,180 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(...continued) This is also where some claim identification between the Tribe of Dan & the Tuatha Dé Danann. The fair Tuatha arrived in Ireland by ship during the late Bronze Age, around the time of the Thera disaster & Thuthmose III’s campaigns into the northern Levant (from whose famous battle at Megiddo we get the term Armageddon). They likely arrived in Ireland from the Levant since the route from there to Irel

🙏1512🕊32👍1🔥1

Signed Montalk

17 Jul 2026, 18:58 UTC≈1,020 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kabbalah is a pagan, gnostic, neoplatonic, mystical system outfitted with Jewish terms & traditions. The NHI & demiurgic technology influence on Kabbalah is indirect & distant. Of particular significance here is the tenth sefira, Malkhut (Kingdom), which refers to the final emanation in the chain of creation: the physical universe. In Kabbalah, Malkhut is used interchangeably with Shekhinah. But this is a conflati

13🙏5🌚1🔥1

Signed Montalk

11 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,060 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Rainbow Body (of Bon/Dzogchen tradition) is identically what the Biblical Jesus attained upon Resurrection. This continues from my previous post. Specifically in the case of Jesus the individual, per the Biblical description & modern anecdotal reports of encounters with him, he attained the highest level which is the “Rainbow Body of Great Transference” where the body disappears completely in a blast of light b

15👍5❤‍🔥3

Signed Montalk

11 Jul 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,280 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(...continued) Thereby is attained full & complete transfiguration of the physical body. The rainbow color concepts comes from the different chakras & subtle body layers being all activated, aligned, and crystallized together in one shot. In the Tibetan Book of the dead, the different colored lights relates to this; they go to different sectors of the astral planes, each with their own conduit & vibration (hence col

16👍74🙏3❤‍🔥2

Signed Montalk

3 Jul 2026, 21:07 UTC≈1,210 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The resurrection of Jesus, as described in the Bible, is a transfiguration of the physical body, meaning its absorption into the fold of spirit so that it can be projected or withdrawn at will. This is a much higher power than simply going OBE and appearing as a ghost to someone (evasion of physics rather than its transcendence). It's an angel-like ability. Btw, here I'm putting positive ultraterrestrials, angels,

39🙏2🍓1

Signed Montalk

3 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,050 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Binding of Demons From what I understand, demons are lower on the spiritual scale of authority. So they have to get around stricter rules & limitations, hence why they have to be so cunning, manipulative, and covert. By being lower, they can be bound by human authority (willpower) if asserted, which is how some magick practitioners can invoke & bind a demon to serve him/her. It's done through will, ritual, agr

14🔥4👀2🤔1🙏1

Signed Montalk

3 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC751 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Evading vs Transcending Physicality: Consider that if a cat is asleep & astral projects, or dies & hangs around as a ghost cat, it can pass through matter, exist outside our perception, even appear & disappear at times in limited cases. Does that make the cat on par with aliens in ships that can project between realms & cloak themselves? No, and here's why: The cat is a lower density being. But it has an astral/et

9🔥4👍2

Signed Montalk

3 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC812 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

(...continued) The demon's power is therefore borrowed/harvested... and can be lost all the same. It's derived indirectly through deception, patient manipulation, and acquisition of consent & energy. Spiritually they are lower beings. So they, even more than aliens, have to obey metaphysical rules & laws. They are lower on the spiritual axis of spiritual power, sovereignty, status, polarity. Thus they are powerless

7🔥5👍1💘1

Signed Montalk

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tommontalk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,615 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Montalk - Transcending the Matrix Control System” (@tommontalk), 3,186 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tommontalk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.