3 years ago someone missed out on the generational bull run of OFM for a girl heβs probably not with anymore π€£π«΅π»
π10π€―3
Signed T

Channel
@tomhuzzz
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,734subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001971854126 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tomhuzzz |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tomhuzzz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 2,734 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 2,733 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 2,735 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 2,740 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 2,749 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 2,756 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 2,762 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 2,765 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 2,766 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 2,766 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 July 2026 β 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,044 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
208 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 80 | 38.5% | |
| β€ | 75 | 36.1% | |
| π | 14 | 6.73% | |
| π | 11 | 5.29% | |
| π³ | 8 | 3.85% | |
| β‘ | 6 | 2.88% | |
| π«‘ | 4 | 1.92% | |
| π | 3 | 1.44% | |
| π― | 3 | 1.44% | |
| π€― | 3 | 1.44% | |
| π | 1 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3 years ago someone missed out on the generational bull run of OFM for a girl heβs probably not with anymore π€£π«΅π»
π10π€―3
Signed T
Weβve been killing it over at @heatchatting all year But I understand some of you still want to build your own teams and keep things in-house So Iβm going to be offering 1-1 consultation calls for those interested this week only Nothing is off limits Come to the call prepared with everything you want me to review / cover and looking forward to helping some of you scale into the backend of the year 41% of the yeaβ¦
β€6
Signed T
The formula for a good content shoot: Wine Record Wine Record Wine Record Wine Record Wine Try it and let me know how much the views go up
β€6π₯4
Signed T
Finished the month with a record day for the team and many individual models hitting records also We are in fucking August already Times flying need to move quicker Fuck spiderman
π₯10β€3π1
Signed T
A week running my 8 figure agency in the USA πΊπΈ Miami inflow event Meetings Business updates NYC shenanigans New video out now: https://youtu.be/JHrYWBtJtJU?si=VeVmkVxPwxouIIgi
π₯8β€2
Signed T
ππ»ππ»
π7β€2
Signed T
People will see you at a crazy party or location and think βhe must be having so much funβ when in reality theres a crackhead with a beats pill on a park bench enjoying himself more yes when you make more money you get to go to nicer places and do cooler shit but the level of enjoyment also goes down with the more money you make, as with more money comes more responsibilty, relationships, problems etc thats why yβ¦
β€10π«‘4
Signed T
Only 43% of the year is left π How it ends is decided by todayβs actions π₯
π₯10β€3
Signed T
Couple happy clients this morning π₯
π₯5
Signed T
WTF $3500 from 65 FREE IG Subs Performing with GFE on a daily basis DM me @tomhuz to inquire about Heat Chatting
π6π₯5π1
Signed T
Mykonos has been eventful Made some good connections and even signed a model or two Villa got robbed and a bunch of shit taken including my passport Hire security they told me, well security were the ones who robbed us Extended a week whilst I waited for my emergency one to arrive and clocked in with some new ideas Flew the Mrs out and put a ring on it, sheβs been BTS at Heat helping us grow for almost 4 years nβ¦
β€21π₯6π3
Signed T
$2100 from 59 FREE Subs on a slow day Clients at @heatchatting having an amazing summer Are you? DM me @tomhuz if you simply would like to make more money Taking on new partnerships this week π€π»
π₯5
Signed T
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tomhuzzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTomhuzz πβ (@tomhuzzz), 2,734 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tomhuzzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.