Channel
@tom_plts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
291subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002011966142 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tom_plts |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tom_plts |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 20:02 | 291 | -3 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 294 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 296 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:37 | 298 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 305 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 307 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 311 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 311 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ЧЛЕН = ХАРИЗМА🌭 — Не ну ладно это бред, давай-ка я тебе расскажу, почему размер вообще не влияет ⚜️ — че за бред-то Часто парни думают, что все зависит от его размера, и если он маленький то это хуево Эх, мужики, сколько раз вам объяснять, что размер твоего дружка никак не привлечет ни одну хорошую девушку ⚜️ — что действительно важно Девушки любят харизматичных парней, тех, которые действительно хотят становит…
ООЙ... ЖЕНИХ... Смотри, мужик. Если все эти три пункта в тебя попали — то бля буду... Ты уже зрелая личность.. ~> Ты виноват Ни мама, ни папа, ни кошечка, ни собачка — в своих проблемах виноват только ты сам ~> Ты понимаешь ...что хочешь. Не так, что жизнь на листочке расписал, а хотя бы примерно понимаешь, куда идёшь ~> Никто не нужен Ты самодостаточная сигма. Понимаешь, что счастье нужно искать в себе, а не…
Сколько см член?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
АХУЕТЬ ТЫ ЖИРНЫЙ — эээ, сам такой — парни, а вам не кажется, что это уже оскорбление? Ладно, пох, хочу кинуть вам гайд, как похудеть на 3-5 кг за неделю, хотите?
🔥1
💭 1OO.OOO₽ С ТЕМОК ЗА ДЕНЬ И это далеко не предел благодаря каналу МЫСЛИ ТЕМЩИКА. В нём ты найдёшь кучу авторских схем для заработка в интернете 1️⃣ Абуз майнинг серверов [ 5.3OO ₽/день ] 2️⃣ Легчайшая схема на 3 клика [ 1.ООО₽/минута ] 3️⃣ Поиском потерянных крипто-кошельков [ 11.ООО₽/круг ] 💬 Успей! Принимаю первых 100 участников
скинь той самой
какие у тебя отношения с родителями?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ХОЧЕШЬ СТАТЬ ХУЯСТЫМ МУЖЧИНОЙ? —> Кушай ГРАНАТ 🔢 Кожа как у ребенка Из-за ферментов в гранате кожа становится более эластичной и упругой. 🔢 Дружок на 200% Антиоксиданты в гранате улучшает действие твоего дружка и являются афродизиаком 🔢 Он ебет тебя рак Гранат — это та ягода, которая может дать пизды даже клеткам рака 🫴🫴🫴 Вывод? Иди кушать гранат Гранат — .. ?
ГОСПОДА, ПРИЯТНОГО АППЕТИТА — короче, я так подумал и решил, что пора нахуй слезать с этого фастфуда ебучего Лишнего веса нет, но ощущение того, что сил мне эта еда не дает — постоянно А ты хаваешь фастик?
Как заработать хоть что-то? 😎 Именно этим вопросом, полтора года назад задавался он Пока не наткнулся на контент и заработал первые 100к с него: — Фишки, актуальные в нынешнем контенте — Как и где найти потенциальных клиентов — Лучшие способы продвижения медийки Его блог будет полезен всем. Каждый из вас гарантировано найдет что-то полезное для себя Познакомься с ним лично: @MAKYAN
УВЕЛИЧИВАЕМ БОЛТЯРУ Никогда не думал, что такое возможно, но оказалось, всё просто: 1️⃣ Упражнения Да, да, и это реально. Прокачиваем член, растяжкой и специальной техникой Казановы, так же улучшаем его длину и ширину, приводя в норму свое кровообращение. 2️⃣ Питание Хавай только качественные продукты с высоким содержанием витаминов и белка. ДОХУЯ МЯСА ХАВАЙ И ЗАПИВАЙ МОЛОЧКОМ🏆 3️⃣ Сжигай жир Шутки про жирных…
Секс или стейк??
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tom_plts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сколько см член?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
какие у тебя отношения с родителями?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Секс или стейк??
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Одноклассница прислала нюдсы..
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Заебал понедельник?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
кто лучше?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 26 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@tom_plts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Том Платц” (@tom_plts), 291 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tom_plts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.