Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 89 days, net +56. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,498–2,583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 12:24
2,564
-4
29 Oct 2026, 15:28
2,568
-3
26 Oct 2026, 06:59
2,571
-2
23 Oct 2026, 13:00
2,573
+1
20 Oct 2026, 20:07
2,572
-1
17 Oct 2026, 11:28
2,573
+2
14 Oct 2026, 20:15
2,571
+5
11 Oct 2026, 09:37
2,566
-4
4 Oct 2026, 20:19
2,570
+4
25 Sept 2026, 07:41
2,566
+19
15 Sept 2026, 11:42
2,547
+2
12 Sept 2026, 04:17
2,545
+6
8 Sept 2026, 04:41
2,539
+5
3 Sept 2026, 08:58
2,534
+2
31 Aug 2026, 00:24
2,532
+13
25 Aug 2026, 00:18
2,519
-2
21 Aug 2026, 04:15
2,521
+2
18 Aug 2026, 01:14
2,519
+1
14 Aug 2026, 21:08
2,518
+4
11 Aug 2026, 05:13
2,514
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
565 reactions across 4 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
280
49.6%
custom 5206185044963516626
132
23.4%
custom 5343741087833933254
50
8.85%
❤🔥
33
5.84%
custom 5256131975562938024
22
3.89%
custom 5384415982905235910
16
2.83%
custom 5303295685750187946
10
1.77%
🔥
9
1.59%
👍
5
0.885%
🏆
3
0.531%
custom 5321014139538147851
2
0.354%
🕊
2
0.354%
custom 5418385514904440280
1
0.177%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 565 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 4 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tolyank0chan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎬 Еще одним городом съемок стал Питер
Здесь я снимал совсем чуть-чуть для основного ролика и много для кое-чего другого. Жирный намёк опять где-то тут 👀
Невероятно круто погулял по городу. Несмотря на то, что до этого уже бывал в Питере пару раз, я получил невероятный восторг.
Помимо этого впервые побывал в бизнес зале на вокзале (спасибо MasayaHinata) ну и самое главное — увиделся с друзьями. Лёха, Кирилл и Женя …
✔️ Съёмки в ЕКБ завершены
Ездил с друзьями снимать нового персонажа. Получилось очень здорово совместить работу и отдых. Я прям почувствовал лето и жизнь.
Осталось съездить в еще один город на 2-3 дня, снять там человечка, потом доснимать меня и домонтировать…
Среди фоток есть 1 кадр из ролика и жирный намёк, что мы планируем помимо 3 видосов на ютуб 👀
🏁🏎
К сожалению, это не кадры из ролика, но не мог не поделиться
Катался много раз на картинге, но на мокрой трассе оказался впервые. Всем советую, очень весело. Вода в лицо, жопу уносит, руль вправо, карт прямо и тд и тп
Сегодня вечером новость насчет видео
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @tolyank0chan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“tolyankochan” (@tolyank0chan), 2,564 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tolyank0chan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
