Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТolyaDV

Channel

ТolyaDV

@tolyadv_channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

744subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001766245810
TypeChannel
Username@tolyadv_channel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tolyadv_channel

Growth

744745744.511 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 745 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 18:17 — 744 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 07:4611 Aug 2026, 18:17
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 744–745 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 18:17744-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:46745first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.5%
avg views ÷ 744 subscribers
Avg views / post
152
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held17 (21 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total457
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 43s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2639.4%
custom 54538913652953655021218.2%
custom 5787256448954142561913.6%
🔥913.6%
😢710.6%
custom 528778564831125067834.55%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC91 viewsread 11 August 2026

Рекомендую чекнути ось ці два відосіки ЄДИН ДВА Подобаються його думки і відношення до роботи, особливо цікавий момент де він говорив про особисту відповідальність перед тим, що ти робиш

8 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC211 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Привіт, шо ти там, як ?

custom 57872564489541425617

30 Jun 2026, 09:09 UTC477 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Тепер ботів в твітері буде ще більше X створили офіційний MCP https://docs.x.com/tools/mcp

15 Jun 2026, 20:39 UTC742 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я використовую АІ кожного дня і ось топ 3 промпти, які я юзаю на постоянці 1. Шо це за хуйня зроби нормально як я сказав 2. Зроби це сам без підтверджень і без помилок 3. Хуйня - перероблюй Зберігай, щоб не втратити

1

15 Jun 2026, 06:41 UTC525 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Перша соточка Done ✅ Хто пише про AI, обов'язково робіть квоти статєйки, тема захисту вайб код проектів, актуальна для всіх, тому якщо напишете правильний опис і відос під тему, то не малий шанс, що квот щось набере До прикладу мій квот набрав -40к+ Також bonsai квотнув мою статтю і набрав - 80к+ переглядів Думаєм Дєлаєм

9custom 57872564489541425612

14 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTC395 viewsread 11 August 2026

Хелоу гайси написав реально корисну статєйку в твтіер для вайбкодерів за данними Veracode - 45% вайбкод проектів мають вразливості в коді тому я зібрав 10 корисних інструментів для покращення безпеки коду ваших проектів таке і квотнути можна якщо ви ведете твітак і пишете про АІ https://x.com/TolyaDV/status/2066040470044651583

11 Jun 2026, 15:32 UTC373 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ще таку штуку помітив Всі пости, які у мене набирали перегляди, набирали не одразу Раніше було так, що якщо в першу годину твій пост набирав маленьку "Вовлєчьоность" то шансів, що він буде рости далі, взагалі практично нема Зараз пости починають набирати після 3 а то і 8 годин після виставлення Особисто у мене було так

11 Jun 2026, 05:49 UTC327 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Продовжую щупати різні формати Напевно найбільша проблема це написати текст до посту щоб привернути увагу Мені все ще важко писати хуйню байтову і вигадувати цифри з неба, але я стараюсь

🔥5

6 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC367 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

3 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC431 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Поки що щупаю, дивлюсь як працює, не скажу, що вже бачу супер мега пуперт закономірності по росту, одне залітає, інше стоїть, треба тестувати кароче У вас там як ?

🔥1

31 May 2026, 11:51 UTC389 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Сьодні на спорті Відос де з вагами підтягуюсь, там 40 кг, думав очі вилізуть нафіг, але по правді кажучи то вже третій підхід на турнічку

3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @tolyadv_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,111,428 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТolyaDV” (@tolyadv_channel), 744 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tolyadv_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.