Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

СилаТока⚡️

@tokpower

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,544subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002639208376
TypeChannel
Username@tokpower
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tokpower

Growth

1,5441,5461,5457 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,544 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,544–1,546 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:321,544-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:361,545-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:321,546no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:251,546first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

294 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13746.6%
custom 53619802591618856805619.0%
4816.3%
🔥103.40%
🤝103.40%
🤣82.72%
😭72.38%
😐51.70%
💯31.02%
😁31.02%
👎20.68%
custom 521532749273839283810.34%
❤‍🔥10.34%
🆒10.34%
👀10.34%
🤪10.34%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.26%
1 of 19 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,370
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzquiu65H16 February 20266 February 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 17 February 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пришли свое видео с помощью бота @TokSiLAbot Ссылка на наш канал

custom 53619802591618856806

11 Feb 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,830 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Коллеги, стоит ли создавать канал в Максе?

  1. Да, будем переходить постепенно туда.26%
  2. Создать канал в Максе, на всякий случай35%
  3. Нет, не собираюсь переходить в Макс.39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

11 Feb 2026, 13:30 UTC≈1,610 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нам нужна ваша помощь! Важный вопрос для будущего «СилаТока» ⚡️ Дорогие друзья, подписчики нашего канала🆘 За время существования нашего канала (с мая 2025 года) мы собрали здесь почти 1700 человек — настоящих профессионалов и энтузиастов со всей России. Я искренне ценю каждого из вас! Мы вместе получаем новые знания, обсуждаем актуальные темы и развиваемся. Ваш вклад в наши обсуждения и вашу обратную связь невозмож

custom 536198025916188568041👍1

10 Feb 2026, 04:51 UTC≈1,350 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, по итогам недавнего опроса стало понятно, что тема электрохимической защиты для многих либо знакома поверхностно, либо встречалась только в составе проектов и отчетов. При этом ЭХЗ — это не абстрактная теория. С ней сталкиваются при эксплуатации кабельных линий, подземных металлических конструкций, заземляющих устройств, трубопроводов и других элементов, работающих в грунте. Мы решили разобрать эту тему по

👍83🤝3

7 Feb 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,330 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый вечер друзья Вопрос такой: инструмент уже прилично поработал, пора обновлять. Сейчас перебираю Озон и ВБ, смотрю и глаза разбегаются. А есть вообще там сейчас что-то достойное, чтобы и по качеству норм не пластилин, и по цене не как крыло самолета? Интересует всё: диэлектрические отвертки пассатижи, бокорезы, стрипперы толковые. Может, по прессам или шурикам кто подскажет? Накидайте артикулов или брендов, кт

👍9custom 53619802591618856803💯1🆒1

7 Feb 2026, 05:46 UTC≈1,210 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, давайте соберём практику в этот пост, сделаем его закрепом! 🔧 У каждого из нас были квартиры, где с первого взгляда понятно: просто не будет. Кривые стены, непонятные трассы, старый алюминий, отсутствие заземления, чужие переделки, щиты без логики — список можно продолжать долго. ❓Интереснее другое: как выходили из ситуации. Предлагаю в комментариях поделиться: – с какими сложными квартирами сталкивались –

8custom 53619802591618856804👍2

7 Feb 2026, 02:38 UTC≈1,360 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

⚡Коллеги, выбираем тему следующего поста. Хотелось бы спросить у вас, будет ли интересно почитать про электрохимическую защиту? Способы применения, назначение?

  1. Да, тема интересная, буду ждать публикации!🤝88%
  2. Не интересно, хотелось бы почитать о чем-то другом! ⛔️12%
  3. (Напишу в комментариях тему, о которой хотелось бы поговорить на канале)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤝4

6 Feb 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,000 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzquiu65HForwarded from @samelectricru

Разыгрываем новинки от Welrok! ⚡️ Собрали три новинки, которые реально пригодятся на объектах для защиты от протечек и проблем с напряжением в сети. Чтобы вы оценили их в работе, а не по фото, устраиваем розыгрыш: 1 место — система защиты от протечек Welrok Base + худи 2 место — переключатель фаз Welrok FS6 + поло 3 место — реле напряжения с разрывом нуля и фазы Welrok LN + поло Систему защиты от протечек Welrok B

custom 53619802591618856802👍1

6 Feb 2026, 01:49 UTC≈1,280 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ИИ?🤖 Пришли свое видео с помощью бота @TokSiLAbot Ссылка на наш канал

👍203💯2🤪1custom 53619802591618856801

4 Feb 2026, 02:45 UTC≈1,350 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, прошлый пост про шаговое напряжение неожиданно дал хорошую активность ⚡️ Значит тема не формальная, а живая и актуальная. Безопасность в нашей работе — это не абстракция и не раздел в инструкции, а конкретные действия в конкретной ситуации ⚡ Мы уже разобрались, что такое шаговое напряжение и при каких условиях оно возникает. Теперь логичный следующий вопрос — что говорят правила и как должен действовать э

👍301👀1🤝1custom 53619802591618856801

3 Feb 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,050 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Больно Пришли свое видео с помощью бота @TokSiLAbot Ссылка на наш канал

😭7custom 53619802591618856804😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tokpower. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Feb 2026, 13:31 UTCAnonymous Poll334 voters

Коллеги, стоит ли создавать канал в Максе?

  1. Да, будем переходить постепенно туда.26%
  2. Создать канал в Максе, на всякий случай35%
  3. Нет, не собираюсь переходить в Макс.39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Feb 2026, 02:38 UTCAnonymous Poll125 voters

⚡Коллеги, выбираем тему следующего поста. Хотелось бы спросить у вас, будет ли интересно почитать про электрохимическую защиту? Способы применения, назначение?

  1. Да, тема интересная, буду ждать публикации!🤝88%
  2. Не интересно, хотелось бы почитать о чем-то другом! ⛔️12%
  3. (Напишу в комментариях тему, о которой хотелось бы поговорить на канале)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 17 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СилаТока⚡️” (@tokpower), 1,544 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokpower.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.