Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🪒Потрошитель IDO, ICO, IEO, INO, IFO, IGO, ITO

@tokenKiller

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

26subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708438034
TypeChannel
Username@tokenKiller
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 5 November 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tokenKiller

Growth

267 August 2026 — 26 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:1826no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:5826first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 November 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
30
Links
25

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2022, 10:55 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Хотите узнать как поживает мой IDO портфель?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Dec 2021, 12:05 UTC≈2,180 viewsread 11 August 2026

На $63 мне дали 2100 токенов DRUG. До конца дня должен быть листинг после чего мне отдадут 20% купленных токенов. Ждём иксы 🚀

1 Dec 2021, 10:38 UTC≈1,600 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀#проект 1️⃣7️⃣ DopeWarz 🎭Лаунчпад: equinox.fund 🌐Сайт: dopewarz.io 📂Телега: @dopewarz 💰Аллокация: $200.000 💰Моя доля: $63 ⌛️Старт пула: с 01.12.2021

23 Nov 2021, 18:42 UTC≈1,320 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀#проект 1️⃣6️⃣ Sugar Bounce 🎭Лаунчпад: private 🌐Сайт: solchicks.io 📂Телега: @solchicksnft 💰Аллокация: $450.000 💰Моя доля: $10.000 ⌛️Старт пула: с 26.11.2021 по 06.12.2021

23 Nov 2021, 18:42 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 11 August 2026

#скоро На днях стала известна дата проведения IDO, которое состоится 30 ноября. Мне удалось получить аллокацию в $10000. Ждем иксы 🤞

19 Nov 2021, 15:43 UTC921 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#листинг 🚀 Сегодня состоялось IDO Sugar Bounce. Мне удалось закупиться на $240 за которые я получил 436 токенов TIP по курсу $0,55. 25% из них разморозили сразу после IDO и я смог продать чуть больше половины по хорошей цене. Итого за проданные 59 токенов я получил $441 и у меня еще осталось 377 TIP в качестве чистой прибыли. Курс уже сильно упал поэтому оставшиеся токены буду держать.

17 Nov 2021, 12:47 UTC731 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀#проект 1️⃣5️⃣ Sugar Bounce 🎭Лаунчпад: paidnetwork 🌐Сайт: sugarbounce.com 📂Телега: @SugarBounceNSFW 💰Аллокация: $150.000 💰Моя доля: $240 ⌛️Старт пула: 19.11.2021, 11:00 UTC

17 Nov 2021, 12:13 UTC581 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#продолжение Кажется, я купил какую-то не нужную хрень 😄 за $1175. 1111 уникальных NFT карточек Crypto Alien Babes, каждая из которых стоила на пресейле $1175. Сколько они будут стоить после запуска проекта, даже предположить боюсь. Радует только то, что позавчера для выкупа своей аллокации мне пришлось продать BNB, который за 2 дня упал на 15%, тем самым снизив мне сумму, которую за заплатил за этот NFT. Не знаю к

15 Nov 2021, 07:31 UTC446 viewsread 11 August 2026

ALGB за 2 дня сделал +70% 🚀 скидываю еще 10% от стартового депозита. Итого у меня остаётся 727091 токен.

15 Nov 2021, 07:27 UTC466 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🚀#проект 1️⃣4️⃣ Crypto Alien Babes 🎭Лаунчпад: Equinox 🌐Сайт: cryptoalienbabes.io 💰Аллокация: $493.500 💰Моя доля: $1175 ⌛️Старт пула: 15 ноября 11:00UTC

13 Nov 2021, 17:16 UTC409 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#продолжение За неделю ALGB подрос и сделал ×10 от цены по которой я покупал его на пресейле. Скидываю 10% токенов по рынку как и планировал. Буду разгружать его частями пока не дойдёт до ×30.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tokenKiller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Feb 2022, 10:55 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

Хотите узнать как поживает мой IDO портфель?

  1. Да76%
  2. Нет24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2021 to 18 February 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 536,982 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪒Потрошитель IDO, ICO, IEO, INO, IFO, IGO, ITO” (@tokenKiller), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tokenKiller.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.