Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

TOFFIIIX | Тоффикс

@toffixdraws

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,089subscribers

+495 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002425327650
TypeChannel
Username@toffixdraws
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/toffixdraws

Growth

3,5944,0893,841.56 August 2026 — 3,594 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,594 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,089 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +495. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,520–4,163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:524,089+495
6 Aug 2026, 20:413,594no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:483,594first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.9%
avg views ÷ 4,089 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,840
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total5,510
Reactions total694
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,047 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,85256.5%
🔥2,08041.2%
💘971.92%
🍓70.139%
😢70.139%
💩40.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,047reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @toffixdraws. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈1,480 views210 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Среди вас есть монтажеры? Открываю набор! Мне нужен постоянный монтажер на получасовые ролики Кто хочет поработать со мной - @Bshuzz Очень нужна ваша помощь!

🔥12583💘2

28 Jul 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,860 views248 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

-EDISONPTS Посчитал, что скину Эда нужно обновление. Все цвета оставил +- те же, чтобы сохранить узнаваемость. Новый отдохнувший Эд - новый свежий скин) -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ @edisonfamilia #Эдисон 💣Ӡѧκѧӡѧϯь ҁκџʜ - @Bshuzz

146🔥94💘8

20 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC≈2,170 views236 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А ролик всё стоит, стоит, стоит...

145🔥90💘1

14 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC≈3,250 views257 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

-ORDER Заказ от Игриса. Было очень много вариантов, но по итогу остановились на двух этих Честно, давно считал, что нужно обновить скины не только нпшкам, но и зябликам👀 -ˋˏ✄┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈┈ @igrisssik #Игрис 💣Ӡѧκѧӡѧϯь ҁκџʜ - @Bshuzz

🔥141113💘3

14 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC≈2,400 views230 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

💀ВСЯ ПРАВДА ПРО ХЕРЕЙДА! РЕАКЦИЯ НП на РАЗОБЛАЧЕНИЕ ХЕРЕЙДА Вот и нарезка. Повторюсь, большинство выделенных моментов в нарезке сделаны в шуточном формате https://youtu.be/jLR16Fu8bow?si=qShVKl4e6JR1PCMc

144🔥83💘3

13 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,130 views245 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всё открыл, всё вернул. Способы связи все те же!

149🔥90💘6

12 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈2,230 views236 reactionsread 7 August 2026

не, переношу на часиков в 9 ок да. Может раньше В общем, напишу

134🔥97💘4💩1

12 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC≈2,530 views257 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Если успею, сегодня запускаю стрим :D Думаю разобрать трек Деда, может на Небулу зайдем

163🔥93💘1

10 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC≈2,610 views269 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Toffix Files №4. darkness #ToffixFiles

167🔥97💘4🍓1

9 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈2,260 views243 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет, новости про нарезку с Мистером X. Есть несколько причин, из-за которых нарезка будет не полной: 1. Есть парочку моментов на стриме, которые ютуб не может пропустить, но без них теряется контекст некоторых важных моментов 2. Если брать и смешивать таким всё в кучу, ролик становится не очень смотрибельным и выходит на 4+ часа Я уместил вкратце всю суть конфликта в 27 минут, чтобы и так было ясно в чём дело

🔥128104😢7💘4

6 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈2,480 views262 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Стрим уже скачивается, сделаю ОГРОМНУЮ нарезку!! Ибо этот случай пропускать нельзя.

159🔥101💘2

5 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,510 views244 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📍📂Надо бы сделать какое нибудь портфолио себе, а то чет заказы делаю, а вам не показываю :P

151🔥90💘3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @toffixdraws. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,034,688 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TOFFIIIX | Тоффикс” (@toffixdraws), 4,089 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/toffixdraws.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.