Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TODOS CONTRA A N.O.M

Channel

TODOS CONTRA A N.O.M

@todoscontraaNOM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3,429subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001240926490
TypeChannel
Username@todoscontraaNOM
Created19 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/todoscontraaNOM

Growth

3,4293,4463,437.57 August 2026 — 3,446 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,446 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,443 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,441 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,432 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,429 subscribers7 August 202619 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 13 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,426–3,449 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 23:033,429-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:053,432-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:573,435-6
10 Aug 2026, 11:273,441-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:513,443-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:153,446no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:093,446first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 13 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
12m 14s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9859.8%
🤬4125.0%
106.10%
👏53.05%
😢42.44%
👎31.83%
🤔21.22%
🌭10.61%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2022 to 20 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Feb 2024, 20:03 UTC≈4,580 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Consegue visualizar essa mensagem? Se consegue responda com um comentário!

👍3

4 Feb 2024, 16:50 UTC≈4,680 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿 👉🏿👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👇🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👉🏽👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👈🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👉🏽👉🏼👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👈🏼👈🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👉🏽 Clique Aqui! 👈🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👉🏽👉🏼👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻👈🏼👈🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👉🏽👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👈🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👉🏾👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👆🏽👈🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👆🏾👈🏿 👉🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👆🏿👈🏿

3👍3

27 Dec 2023, 17:46 UTC≈3,630 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Miocardite, pericardite, abortos espontâneos, má formação fetal, infertilidade... Pais e médicos falam da destruição que a vacina contra covid tem causado nas famílias pelo mundo. t.me/reacoesadversas

👍41

19 Dec 2023, 10:38 UTC≈3,460 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Exigência de uso de máscaras: mais ACHISMO POLÍTICO que CIÊNCIA ⇒ Nesta revisão sistemática, 16 estudos não encontraram nenhum efeito do uso da máscara na infecção ou transmissão, enquanto seis estudos que relataram uma associação protetora apresentavam risco crítico ou grave de viés. ⇒ Como os benefícios do uso de máscara para a COVID-19 não foram identificados, ⚠️ deve-se reconhecer que as recomendações de uso de

👍21

17 Dec 2023, 15:55 UTC≈2,440 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Relatório japonês conclui que as recentes variantes covid não surgiram de forma natural "... O estudo apontou cerca de 100 subvariantes Omicron separadas que não poderiam ter surgido naturalmente. A existência destas variantes e a ordem sistemática em que apareceram fornecem provas conclusivas da criação e libertação em laboratório em grande escala dos vírus da COVID-19." 🔗 zenodo.org/records/8361577 "... concluí

7 Jul 2023, 10:27 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Quem controla a escola controla o futuro: Material escolar destinado a crianças da ESCOLA PRIMÁRIA do Reino Unido, com mais de 10 anos, ensina as crianças que seu corpo pode estar errado e isso pode ser corrigido com medicamentos e cirurgias. Fonte: torne-seme.uk A publicação diz: "OS GENITAIS COM QUE VOCÊ NASCEU NÃO DETERMINAM SEU GÊNERO" "VOCÊ PODE FAZER CIRURGIA CORRETIVA PARA REMOVER OS ÓRGÃOS REPRODUTIVOS FEM

26 May 2023, 12:04 UTC≈1,710 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ABSURDO! Perseguição política e financeira aos milhares de médicos que defenderam o tratamento precoce contra covid. O objetivo é claro: CALAR esses profissionais e desestimula-Los a continuar no combate as fakenews da indústria farmacêutica para com isso manter o público crendo somente na narrativa padrão de que vacinas são a única e exclusiva solução para a salvação da saúde pública, e não produtos naturais que, s

2🤬2👍1

20 Nov 2022, 19:13 UTC≈2,050 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍21👎1

17 Nov 2022, 19:36 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://www.epochtimes.com.br/as-politicas-de-mudanca-climatica-de-biden-beneficiam-interesses-da-china-ex-agente-da-nsa_179964.html

17 Nov 2022, 17:20 UTC≈1,580 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍2🤬1

10 Nov 2022, 23:32 UTC≈1,550 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ogranderesetVideo

https://t.me/ograndereset/158

😢4🌭1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @todoscontraaNOM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TODOS CONTRA A N.O.M” (@todoscontraaNOM), 3,429 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/todoscontraaNOM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.