Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 無逸齋隨筆

Channel

無逸齋隨筆

@todayread

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,505subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001261252402
TypeChannel
Username@todayread
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/todayread

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5052,5362,520.57 August 2026 — 2,525 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,525 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,527 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,533 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,536 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,510 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,517 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,518 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,521 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,517 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,513 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,510 subscribers27 September 2026 — 2,505 subscribers7 August 202627 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,500–2,541 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 14:212,505-5
17 Sept 2026, 23:172,510-3
13 Sept 2026, 14:192,513-4
9 Sept 2026, 20:412,517-4
4 Sept 2026, 22:392,521+3
1 Sept 2026, 02:272,518+1
29 Aug 2026, 07:262,517+1
26 Aug 2026, 06:242,516+6
23 Aug 2026, 12:152,510-26
20 Aug 2026, 02:422,536+3
16 Aug 2026, 19:492,533+6
13 Aug 2026, 09:172,527+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:002,525no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:532,525first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2062.5%
👍1237.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC633 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

倒懸之世,無望之境,將何以處? 曰:無過三端。一曰昏之,二曰醉之,三曰居於道。

👍1

12 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC587 viewsread 7 August 2026

倒悬之世,无望之境,何以自处? 曰:三。一者麻痹,二者麻醉,三者存乎道。

12 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC582 viewsread 7 August 2026

庄子:天地与我并生,万物与我为一。 同一 identification 道通为一,莫若以明 柏拉图:若一是/若一一 —— 同为「一」,但却在审美与思辨两个进向阐释。

12 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC555 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

《庄子·知北游》中记载了「东郭子问道」一节,庄子答曰「道在屎溺」。 《柏拉图对话集·巴门尼德篇》中,巴门尼德问少年苏格拉底「即便卑微如尘土,也有相吗」,苏格拉底不知如何作答。

❤1

11 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC554 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

整理我电脑里的音乐,发现了古早的 云母逼乐队!

❤2

8 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC569 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#Music #GitHub情报 #Web 💽 介绍两个「劣迹艺人」音乐在线网站 最近宋冬野推出新专辑《再想想》,引发了不小的讨论。这位曾经吸毒的艺人因抱怨在国内被禁演之后,时隔多年专辑还能上架网易云,实属不容易。不过,今天介绍的这两位「劣迹艺人」就不像宋冬野这么幸运,TA 们的歌曲已经在国内流媒体平台悉数下架 1️⃣ 李志音乐播放器 🔗:GitHub | Web 南京人李志因为民谣而为人们熟知,但他的野心不止于此。多场 Live 中他不断变化曲目的编排,融合了声光电、弦乐、爵士,影响了后来的一众乐队;他还在南京创办了 Livehouse 和演出生态,从欧拉到 1701,越来越多的人走进现场、感受演出文化 2019 年,因为一些复杂的原因,李志的歌曲在国内不能正常收听。时至今日,即便在国外的 Spotify、Apple Music 上,依然有些歌曲是灰色的:比如专辑《F》中的《女神》、专辑《梵高先生》中的《广场》,还…

❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @todayread. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

飛蛾書庫
@MothLib · 34,658
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“無逸齋隨筆” (@todayread), 2,505 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/todayread.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.