Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Титмаус⚡️

Channel

Титмаус⚡️

@titwow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,233subscribers

+1,091 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001619835515
TypeChannel
Username@titwow
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/titwow

Growth

11,13312,23311,6837 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,137 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,135 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,140 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,152 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,253 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,631 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,714 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,919 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,118 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,233 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1,091. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,968–12,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 04:3812,233+115
21 Aug 2026, 15:2712,118+199
20 Aug 2026, 16:1711,919+166
19 Aug 2026, 15:5211,753+39
18 Aug 2026, 17:5711,714+83
17 Aug 2026, 20:0511,631+378
16 Aug 2026, 16:5711,253+101
15 Aug 2026, 01:0811,152+19
12 Aug 2026, 13:5411,133-7
11 Aug 2026, 15:3211,140+5
10 Aug 2026, 15:4811,135-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:3111,137-2
8 Aug 2026, 18:4611,139-4
7 Aug 2026, 20:2111,143+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:3011,142no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:2311,142first reading

Engagement

115 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.23%
avg views ÷ 12,233 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
113 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 115 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held115 (3 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total113,801
Reactions total6,686
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,686 reactions across 113 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,29579.2%
🔥70710.6%
🤣1191.78%
👌1161.73%
🗿1131.69%
😍1131.69%
🤬821.23%
😱721.08%
🐳550.823%
🤯120.179%
👏20.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,686reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC376 views20 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

17🐳2😍1

22 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC380 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

17😍2🐳1🗿1

22 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC476 views24 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Poll

Какая версия круче? 🗿

  1. 2023 💚80%
  2. 2026 🩷38%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21😍2🐳1

22 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC581 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026

👀 Можете сравнить новую и старую версию: https://youtu.be/oDf-F0akbBQ

🔥18

22 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC668 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026

🔴 НОВЫЙ ШОРТС! Сигма remastered! 😱 https://youtube.com/shorts/gbmO7hJkX04

24🔥2👌1😱1

22 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC668 views32 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

27🔥4😍1

22 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC653 views49 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Пристегните ремни! Мы приземляемся в 2023! 😱 Видос через 3... 2... 1...

41😱8

22 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC877 views52 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

👀 Слишком грустный...

50😍2

22 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC889 views73 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Ловите спойлер нового шортса! 😂⚡️

😱4518🔥4🐳3🤣3

22 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC841 views46 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Пристегните ремни! Сейчас мы отправимся в 2023 год! 😎

36👌3🔥3🗿2🤣2

22 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC967 views36 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

28🔥8

22 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,120 views40 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥298😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @titwow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTCAnonymous Poll209 voters

Какая версия круче? 🗿

  1. 2023 💚80%
  2. 2026 🩷38%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTCAnonymous Poll627 voters

⚡️ Какой трек делаем? 🤨👇🏻

  1. Бабка-камень 🗿🖤🧡29%
  2. Сигма-крипер 🗿🩷💚82%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll230 voters

Какой крипер круче?

  1. В красной шапочке! ❤️73%
  2. В синей шапочке! 💙21%
  3. В чёрной шапочке 🖤22%
  4. В жёлтой шапочке 💛22%
  5. В зелёной шапочке 💚27%
  6. В голубой шапочке 🩵19%
  7. В серой шапочке 🩶17%

The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Holy Baam
@holybaam_live · 86,536
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Титмаус⚡️” (@titwow), 12,233 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/titwow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.