Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

שקרים בתשקורת - הערוץ הרשמי

@tishkoret

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,602subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001312453620
TypeChannel
Username@tishkoret
Description✅במה לחשיפת שקרים של ערוצי המיינסטרים בארץ ובעולם ✅ חדשות אמיתיות מהעולם ✅ תכנים מעניינים
Created26 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tishkoret

Growth

5,6025,6035,602.57 Aug 2026, 01:34 — 5,603 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:45 — 5,603 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:28 — 5,602 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:347 Aug 2026, 11:28
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,602–5,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 11:285,602-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:455,603no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:345,603first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,600
Videos
8,390
Links
14,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 23s
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4316.3%
🤣4115.6%
228.37%
💯217.98%
😨166.08%
🤮166.08%
👌124.56%
😡124.56%
😢124.56%
🤬124.56%
😁103.80%
🤡103.80%
🔥93.42%
🙏72.66%
👀41.52%
🤷‍♀41.52%
🍾31.14%
🤔31.14%
👏20.76%
😱20.76%
1 further kind20.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2025, 21:59 UTC≈4,120 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/tishkoret

👍7😨4💯3😢31😁1

10 Sept 2025, 21:59 UTC≈4,760 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

ככה נראית שטיפת מוח ‼️ https://t.me/tishkoret

👍11🤮82

28 Aug 2025, 05:03 UTC≈3,550 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

איך מייצרים פחד ככלי לשליטה בשלושה שלבים הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

💯72👍2

27 Aug 2025, 21:59 UTC≈3,180 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

פדופיליה בחסות מדינת ישרא-הל הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

😨12🤬8🤣6😡41😱1

27 Aug 2025, 19:41 UTC≈2,330 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

וממשיכים לבחור בו 🤦‍♂️ הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

😁9💯4🤣3🤮2

27 Aug 2025, 12:10 UTC≈2,090 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

כשמלחמה היא לשם מחלוקת ופילוג ולא לשם שמיים הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

👍3👏2🤨2

26 Aug 2025, 20:20 UTC≈1,810 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ועל זה אף אחד לא שובת את המדינה, ולא יוצא להפגין הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

😡8👍4🤡3

26 Aug 2025, 02:59 UTC≈1,730 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kipaaduVideo

רוברט קנדי ג׳וניור כביכול מבטל תקציבים לזריקות המחרידות שמשקרים לנו שהן ״חיסונים״ עם הרבה רעש תקשורתי, אבל מאחורי גבכם הוא הודיע שהוא בעצם מפתח ממש כעת ״חיסון חדש שיהיה הרבה יותר יעיל נגד נגיפים כמו ״הקורונה״. אז אחרי המוות והפציעות שגרמו הזריקות הקודמות, מה שגרם לאיבוד אמון בסדר גודל ענק של העמים במערכות הבריאות, האם כעת הציבור יתפתה ויקח את המזרק (המורעל?) של קנדי? חשבו על זה: משפחות הפשע שהשתלטו כרגע על העולם, כמו

💯3👍21

25 Aug 2025, 21:25 UTC≈1,420 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

שטרות מזויפים? או הקמפיין לביטול המזומן תופס תאוצה? כתבה מהונדסת כדי לבטל אותו ולהצדיק שיעבוד דיגיטלי מוחלט ? הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

👌122

25 Aug 2025, 20:42 UTC≈1,910 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

הלכה האנושות.... מישהו יודע אם יש כבר חיסון??? הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

🤣15🤔2

25 Aug 2025, 13:13 UTC≈1,620 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

עוד איש ביטחון שהתאבד לכאורה. האומנם? הורגים את עצמם או שרוצחים אותם כי ראו משהו שאסור היה לראות? הצטרפו לערוץ הטלגרם שלנו: https://t.me/tishkoret

😢9🤷‍♀4🤡2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tishkoret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2025, 11:58 UTCAnonymous Poll208 voters

לדעתי

  1. האג'נדה דוהרת בכל הכוח ואין איך לעצור אותה61%
  2. האג'נדה תקועה17%
  3. האג'נדה בקריסה22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 August 2025 to 10 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 834,385 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“שקרים בתשקורת - הערוץ הרשמי” (@tishkoret), 5,602 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tishkoret.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.