12 measurements spanning 29 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,007–4,119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 08:17
4,085
-12
1 Sept 2026, 14:46
4,097
-9
29 Aug 2026, 19:13
4,106
+20
26 Aug 2026, 15:48
4,086
+66
23 Aug 2026, 23:58
4,020
-2
20 Aug 2026, 03:52
4,022
-9
17 Aug 2026, 12:47
4,031
-3
14 Aug 2026, 01:59
4,034
-3
10 Aug 2026, 17:21
4,037
-5
7 Aug 2026, 18:05
4,042
-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
4,043
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:39
4,043
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
344 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
234
68.0%
❤🔥
31
9.01%
👍
30
8.72%
🔥
25
7.27%
✍
9
2.62%
🙏
6
1.74%
🕊
5
1.45%
🎉
1
0.291%
🤗
1
0.291%
🤬
1
0.291%
🥰
1
0.291%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 8 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tishclub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
2 года назад пост «Доброе слово» привел в Тишь более 1000 подписчиков - такой огромный дефицит у нас доброго отношения к сами себе❤️
Прочитайте сам пост вот здесь, пожалуйста) там есть ключи, как можно на эту тему смотреть самому.
Подниму эту тему, продолжая разговор о том, как сейчас себя поддерживать.
Давайте представим.
Вот, мы собираемся в большой и долгий поход (нетнет, отказаться варианта нет, там все вариант…
В чем сила, брат?
Нет тех, кто не ищет сейчас ресурсов. Продолжим искать и мы)
Результаты голосования для меня всегда лучшая подсказка и материал для размышлений.
Спасибо, за ваши ответы❤️
С большим отрывом победили дерево, маяк и берег.
На предков мы совсем не всегда умеем опираться по многим причинам,
но одна из главных такова: часто основа воспоминаний о родных связана с нашими взаимоотношениями, и они в больш…
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если честно, уже самой тошно видеть и писать эти все фразы: «в наше трудное время», «когда вокруг хаос и неопределенность», «когда мир сошел с ума» и тп.
Я очень очень хочу говорить про другое!!
Хочу дать старт своему проекту про отношения между мужчинами и женщинами.
У меня столько материала, столько невероятно прекрасных пси-комиксов и находок, чтобы в отношениях расцветать и наполняться, а не разрушаться дотла.
…
Эта фотка ждала своего поста очень давно) невероятно реалистичная фигурка буддистского монаха была обнаружена в совершенно неожиданном месте, стояла запылённая и невостребованная) а я не могла не начать с ней диалог))
В продолжение поиска внутренней тишины.
«Как остановить мысли?»
Вопрос этот, как оказалось, для начинающих). Задавала я его сотни раз.
Сколько способов узнала за годы поисков, не сосчитать)
Многие из …
Попробуйте найти тишину в моем сопровождении🙏🏻
И вообще - попробуйте сами себе очень нежно, ласково, как очень очень добрая бабушка или дедушка говорить в трудные моменты:
тиштиштишее, я с тобой, тиштиштииише, я с тобой❤️
Вдруг, это и для вас станет той самой внутренней опорой😉
#тихотворение
Другие короткие практики собраны тут
Пару лет назад, когда в нашем тихом дворе поселился шум от замены бордюров, написала пост, который стал актуален в этом году - за стенкой у соседей случился капремонт.
Несколько дней шум, от которого не слышно ничего. Часами.
И я вспомнила про очень важное лекарство для нас всех сейчас.
Тишина.
Внутри и снаружи.
Настоящая роскошь нашего времени.
Как же ее найти?
———————
Первые дни я не ощущала какое сильное напряже…
Получила много теплых откликов на предыдущий пост.
Спасибо большое пребольшое!
И были те, кто спрашивал как можно сейчас, когда вокруг так страшно, согревать сердца?
Особенно, если рядом нет никого.
Спасибо, что спросили и поделились!
Я рада ответить здесь, ведь нам всем бывает одиноко и некому лапу подать.
В посте про Мортидо и Либидо я упомянула, что на стороне Мортидо стоят могущественные воины - чувство вины и …
❤39❤🔥7🕊3👍2🎉1🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tishclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 142%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тишь” (@tishclub), 4,085 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tishclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.