Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tips Lelaki Segak

Channel

Tips Lelaki Segak

@tipslelakisegak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,382subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001233681731
TypeChannel
Username@tipslelakisegak
DescriptionKita kongsi macam-macam supaya boleh jadi #LelakiSegak
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/tipslelakisegak

Growth

2,3829 Sept 2026, 09:47 — 2,382 subscribers9 Sept 2026, 10:22 — 2,382 subscribers9 Sept 2026, 09:479 Sept 2026, 10:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,380–2,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 10:222,382no change
9 Sept 2026, 09:472,382first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.59%
avg views ÷ 2,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
157
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 September 2026
Posts held20 (9 May 20265 September 2026)
Views total314
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
221
Videos
53
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 19s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
480.0%
👍120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 5 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video

Cara soal kena betul. Barulah kita dapat info yang betul.

👍1

25 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC230 viewsread 9 September 2026
Video

Buatlah keputusan under kuasa kita. Itu tanggungjawab kita.

3 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC370 viewsread 9 September 2026

Bila projek besar berjaya, orang selalu tepuk tangan dekat tim sales atau pengurusan atasan. Tapi ramai terlepas pandang: tanpa sistem sokongan yang kukuh di belakang, projek itu boleh runtuh dalam masa seminit. Pernah tak tengok kes di mana salesman berjaya tutup tender berjuta ringgit, tapi barang sampai lewat sebab dokumen pentadbiran berterabur? Atau product yang hebat tapi pelanggan lari sebab service daripada

31 Jul 2026, 00:52 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Bila staf paling perform serah surat peletakan jawatan, reaksi pertama kebanyakan bos adalah tuduh mereka tak setia atau gelap mata sebab tawaran gaji tempat lain. Padahal, realitinya mereka bukan tinggalkan syarikat, mereka tinggalkan bos yang tak pernah peduli. Saya pernah dengar seorang pekerja yang sangat komited, sentiasa balik lewat, dan selesaikan semua masalah pasukan. Tapi tiap kali dia capai target, respo

1

25 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC296 viewsread 9 September 2026

Bila leader jenis penakut diberi kuasa, perkara pertama yang mati dalam syarikat bukan prestasi, tapi kualiti orang bawah. Jenis bos yang bila ada isu panas, dia hilang. Bila kena buat keputusan berisiko, dia campak bola kat orang lain. Tapi bila projek jadi, dia orang pertama berdiri depan sekali ambil kredit. Tindakan acah selamat ni sebenarnya racun. Staf yang perform akan cepat burnout dan angkat kaki sebab pen

19 Jul 2026, 23:15 UTC307 viewsread 9 September 2026

Ramai leader terjebak dalam perangkap micromanagement kerana rasa tiada siapa boleh buat kerja sesempurna diri mereka sendiri. Kita ambil alih semua tugasan kecil, semak setiap baris e-mel staf, dan paksa mereka ikut cara kita seratus peratus atas alasan nak jaga kualiti. Tabiat ini sebenarnya membunuh kreativiti dan potensi orang bawah. Staf akan jadi robot yang tidak berani berfikir sendiri sebab tahu bos akan ub

19 Jul 2026, 05:08 UTC232 viewsread 9 September 2026

Bila berdepan dengan masalah operasi atau projek yang sangkut, perkara pertama yang kerap bocor dalam bilik mesyuarat ialah emosi dan amarah seorang leader. Kita cenderung untuk lepaskan geram pada orangnya, bukannya selesaikan punca masalah. Kita mula serang personaliti staf, sebut pasal sikap mereka, dan ungkit silap-silap lama yang tak ada kaitan. Bila kita urus isu guna emosi, staf automatik akan masuk mod defe

18 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC185 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Kita as a leader tidak perlu selalu kelihatan baik especially kalau kita ni sentiasa cuba memenuhi semua permintaan staf. Nanti kita terjebak dalam satu perangkap dipanggil - approval trap. Kita takut nak buat keputusan tegas atau potong benefit yang tidak relevan semata-mata kerana risau staf akan berkecil hati, hilang motivasi, atau menganggap kita kejam. Akibatnya, kita mula melayan perangai entitlement orang ba

1

18 Jul 2026, 01:05 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Antara tanda kepimpinan yang lemah ialah bila ada sejenis leader yang suka ambil kredit waktu team dapat kejayaan, tapi bila projek tu gagal, kita cepat-cepat tuduh orang bawah yang salah. Bila jualan syarikat mencanak naik atau projek dapat pujian melambung daripada klien, kita orang pertama yang ke depan canang nama sendiri kononnya itu hasil air tangan kita. Tapi bezanya bila ada silap sikit atau target tak capa

2

16 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC180 viewsread 9 September 2026

Bila kita naik pangkat jadi leader atau urus bisnes sendiri, antara fasa paling kekok ialah bila kena urus bekas rakan sekerja atau kawan baik sendiri yang sekarang dah jadi staf bawah kita. Dulu waktu sama-sama level staf, kita boleh lepak sekali kutuk management. Tapi bila sempadan tu dah berubah, cara komunikasi dan expectation kerja pun automatik kena berubah sekali. Silap besar ramai leader baru buat ialah mere

15 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC192 viewsread 9 September 2026

Perangkap dalam leadership yang agak mencabar nak handle ialah apabila kita cuba nak selesaikan konflik dalam team dengan cara menjadi orang tengah untuk sampaikan pesanan. Staf A tak puas hati dengan Staf B, mereka datang mengadu pada kita, dan kita pula yang pergi tolong cakapkan bagi pihak mereka demi nak jaga keharmonisan kononnya. Bila kita ambil peranan sebagai posmen ni, kita sebenarnya sedang menyuburkan bu

14 Jul 2026, 03:06 UTC208 viewsread 9 September 2026

Benda paling bahaya yang leader selalu buat ialah "assumption trap"—kita syok sendiri assume staf dah tahu semua benda dalam kepala otak kita. Kita bagi arahan sepatah dua kata, lepas tu kita harapkan staf hantar hasil yang 100% perfect macam apa yang kita bayangkan. Bila hasil kerja tu hancur dan lari jauh dari apa yang kita nak, kita mula nak melenting dan cop staf tu tak kompeten. Padahal, punca utamanya ialah ko

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tipslelakisegak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TikTok Shopee Malaysia Class
@shopeemyclass · 27,674
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 10 September 2026
Komuniti SuamiSihat
@suamisihat · 28,700
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tips Lelaki Segak” (@tipslelakisegak), 2,382 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tipslelakisegak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.