Channel
@tingting248
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,875subscribers
+1,139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004334746045 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tingting248 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tingting248 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:19 | 2,875 | +1,128 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,747 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 1,737 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 1,736 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,437 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 宝安婷婷 @ting8110 长腿大胸御姐 半价 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-宝安婷婷💋秘密花园🉑上门 🎫 加入-深圳野狼老师轮播 🎫 加入-野狼抽奖活动 🎫 加入-深圳野狼修车公开榜 🎫 加入-深圳野狼修车交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 30 条 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 1P半价 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 1、开奖后 3 天内约课使用，老师大姨妈顺延； 2、需要提交报告，优惠券不得私下转让或出售； 3、上课时间需要和老师私聊提前约好； 4、不遵循抽奖说明将永久拉黑。 🔋 人品加成：⚡️× 5 规则 📅 开奖日期：(北京时间) 2026年08月09日 12时30分00秒
长腿大胸御姐 花名： #婷婷 位置： 深圳 #宝安 年龄： 01 胸围： 38C 身高： 173 体重： 55kg 课费： 700P 1300PP #八百 特色： #大胸 #御姐 #大长腿 #新人 #女友感 #外出 #过夜 #少妇 服务： #鸳鸯浴 #无套口 #六九 #深喉 #口爆 #毒龙 #丝袜制服 #按摩 #漫游 私聊： @ting8110 双向： @ttingting88bot 频道： @tingting248 旧频道： @aalong520 📤 提交报告 | 📋 查看报告（0）
❤1
💐💐💐 开奖了 💐💐💐 婷婷半价券活动 开奖了 抽奖人数：103，抽奖号数：131 1. 夜影流云梦【祝福4次】 中得：P半价券 抽奖说明： 优惠卷有效为7天 半价卷有效为5天 白嫖卷有效为3天 杜绝私下交易转让，一经发现取消资格 兑换 @ting8110 🔍 杜绝黑幕，点击查看本次开奖全程验证
🎉 婷婷半价券活动 🎁 奖品清单 • P半价券 × 1 🛡️ 参与条件 • 加入 深圳花满楼 • 加入 花满楼资源频道 • 加入 花满楼轮播 • 加入 花满楼报告 • 加入 宝安婷婷💋秘密花园🉑上门 • 必须设置用户名 🔮 祝福加持 • 祝福消耗：88花瓣 • 祝福上限：100次 • 祝福一次增加一个抽奖号，提高中奖率 • 幸运值祝福：支持 幸运值说明 ⌛ 开奖时间 • 2026-08-01 14:54:00 📜 抽奖说明 优惠卷有效为7天 半价卷有效为5天 白嫖卷有效为3天 杜绝私下交易转让，一经发现取消资格 兑换 @ting8110 ✨ 愿好运伴随每一位参与者，祝大家好运！
风景如画，山河远阔，人间烟火，心存阳光，必有诗和远方 🥰
❤1
兄弟萌？😁你看我是不是成疯子了 成爆炸头发啦！ 嘻嘻 一回到家就是成村姑啦！ 还是老家的风景优美！倒计时4天 兄弟萌？等我哦！ 📝📝📝
❤3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @tingting248. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 149,967 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“宝安婷婷💋秘密花园🉑上门” (@tingting248), 2,875 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tingting248.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.