Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 每天听本书<听书|课程分享>

Channel

每天听本书<听书|课程分享>

@tingshushare

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,858subscribers

+1,119 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002100799341
TypeChannel
Username@tingshushare
Description📚每天半小时,搞懂一本书 听书专为忙碌的人设计,带你快速了解一本书的精华,随时充电。 广告合作: @BaitanshuBot
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/tingshushare

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,73913,85813,298.51 September 2026 — 12,739 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,750 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,767 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,781 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,824 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,869 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,900 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,924 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,947 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,986 subscribers30 September 2026 — 13,183 subscribers5 October 2026 — 13,311 subscribers10 October 2026 — 13,362 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,421 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,441 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,450 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,468 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,477 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,493 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,500 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,509 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,513 subscribers22 October 2026 — 13,529 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,543 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,566 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,587 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,604 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,622 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,639 subscribers30 October 2026 — 13,664 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,680 subscribers1 November 2026 — 13,703 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,723 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,744 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,764 subscribers5 November 2026 — 13,785 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,812 subscribers7 November 2026 — 13,832 subscribers8 November 2026 — 13,858 subscribers1 September 20268 November 2026
39 measurements spanning 68 days, net +1,119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,571–14,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 09:4713,858+26
7 Nov 2026, 07:2113,832+20
6 Nov 2026, 06:3513,812+27
5 Nov 2026, 03:4713,785+21
4 Nov 2026, 02:2713,764+20
3 Nov 2026, 02:0613,744+21
2 Nov 2026, 05:3113,723+20
1 Nov 2026, 01:4813,703+23
31 Oct 2026, 03:1013,680+16
30 Oct 2026, 02:0713,664+25
29 Oct 2026, 02:4713,639+17
28 Oct 2026, 00:1613,622+18
27 Oct 2026, 00:4513,604+17
25 Oct 2026, 21:1913,587+21
24 Oct 2026, 20:3813,566+23
23 Oct 2026, 23:0813,543+14
22 Oct 2026, 20:4613,529+16
21 Oct 2026, 19:0113,513+4
20 Oct 2026, 16:2713,509+9
19 Oct 2026, 16:3613,500first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 13,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,530
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.097%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held46 (12 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total36,685
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,120
Videos
≈3
Links
≈1,990

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 25 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3685.7%
👍511.9%
⚡12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC422 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《连城诀》 ——世界充满恶意,他却选择“不复仇”。 作者:金庸 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#文学 #小说 #武侠 这本书能为你 1.解读者是知名作家周之江,作为一名资深的“金庸迷”,他对金庸作品有着深刻的理解与深沉的情结; 2.剖析金庸与大仲马的文学隔空对话:同样是冤狱、宝藏与死里逃生,看狄云与基督山伯爵如何在“绝不宽恕”与“善恶有报”之间分道扬镳——感受中西方复仇美学与命运观的灵魂碰撞; 3.解读“空心菜”这一贯穿全书的宿命隐喻:一味大江南北最寻常、最烂贱的蔬菜,如何写尽少年初恋的温情、命运的酸涩与“好死不如赖活着”的顽强生命力——在最幽暗的人性深渊里寻得一抹希冀; 4.追溯金庸创作生涯的重要分水岭:揭秘江南长工“和生”的真实悲惨冤屈与金庸当年的笔墨论战,看伟大的作家如何将个人孤愤与现实投影,化作一部写给自己的暗黑自传之书——看懂金庸创作心态的蜕变与进化。 📡音频:点击收听

7 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC679 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《请这样对待孩子的大脑》 ——每一个让你崩溃的场景,背后都有大脑的理由 作者:[西] 阿尔瓦罗·毕尔巴鄂 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#家庭育儿 #脑科学 #亲子共读 本期听书能为你 1、分享孩子情绪失控的神经科学解释——为什么两岁半的孩子“油门装好了但刹车没装”,为什么傍晚是孩子情绪最不稳定的“魔法时刻”,看清孩子不是故意作对,而是大脑还没准备好; 2、理解沉迷屏幕背后的“奖励系统钝化”机制,以及为什么强行“断供”只会让崩溃更剧烈,学会用循序渐进和提供替代品的方式帮孩子重建对真实世界的兴趣; 3、学会用五步法应对情绪风暴——解释、给时间、不离开、同理心回应、平静后拥抱,建立一套在孩子崩溃时真正有效,而不是让事情更糟的应对框架。 📡音频:点击收听

6 Nov 2026, 09:08 UTC844 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《如何过上有意义的人生》 ——何为“有意义的人生”?斯坦福大学专家告诉你不一样的真相! 作者:[美]比尔•博内特 / [美] 戴夫•伊万斯 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#心理学 #身心关系 #心灵读物 本期听书能为你 1.系统介绍斯坦福大学人生设计课主创博内特和伊万斯的最新研究,指出传统人生意义追寻路径的误区。 2.介绍三种全新、简单的人生意义实现路径,进入心流,连贯生活,构建“塑造性社区”,以及实践它们的具体步骤。 3.本书作者博内特和伊万斯,是斯坦福大学人生实验室的联合创始人。博内特是斯坦福大学设计项目的执行董事,伊万斯是斯坦福大学设计项目讲师、管理顾问。 📡音频:点击收听

4 Nov 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《20世纪思想史:从弗洛伊德到互联网》 ——你以为的世界,是100年前的思想替你建好的 作者:[英] 彼得·沃森 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#哲学 #历史 #人文艺术 本期听书能为你 1.走完20世纪思想的五条主干道:从确定性的松动到维也纳的驿站,从战争的炼狱到现代心智的形成,直面科学的力量与困境; 2.找到当下焦虑的思想根源:信息过载、意义缺失、技术失控感——用100年的思想演变,拆解我们今天的困惑从何而来; 3.在纷乱世界里确立坐标感:了解今天的争论从哪来,才能想清楚往哪走,获得面对不确定的勇气。 4.解读人是中国目前思想史领域最好的老师之一,华东师范大学刘擎教授,在讲解思想史的同时,他也将呈现自己的思考与见解。 📡音频:点击收听

2 Nov 2026, 10:41 UTC≈1,390 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《数学觉醒:学会更清晰地思考》 ——其实人人都可以拥有“数学家头脑” 作者:[法] 戴维·贝西 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#自然科学 #数学 #豆瓣高分 本期听书能为你 1、解读人是北京航空航天大学计算机学院长聘副教授刘雪峰老师; 2、帮你理解为什么数学家脑中最关键的直觉画面从未被直接传递给我们——我们接收到的只是经过“巨大膨胀系数”转换后的公式,读不懂数学从来不是你的问题; 3、分享“直觉是可以培养的”这一核心论点,看清大数学家与普通人的区别不在于天赋,而在于他们从小掌握了建立数学直觉的方法,重建对自己学习能力的信心; 4、了解如何从公式的字里行间找到那幅直觉画面,学会用“这个结论是否自然而然”来判断自己是否真正理解了一个数学概念。 📡音频:点击收听

👍1

1 Nov 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,380 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《故事法则》 ——故事为什么是一面折射人类内心的镜子 作者:施爱东 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#人类学 #民俗文学 #社会观察 本期听书能为你 1.详细拆解民间传说“故事”结构,情节与结局的设计建构套路与特征。 2.从这些“套路”出发,发掘故事传说背后反映的,超越时间周期与文化差异的心理需求与焦虑。 3.本期解读人就是本书作者,社科院文学所研究员,资深故事民俗学研究专家施爱东教授。 📡音频:点击收听

❤1

31 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,380 views8 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《吾辈如神:重构AI时代的生存力与胜任力》 ——写给每一个身处技术加速时代却感到迷茫的普通人 作者: [美]彼得·戴曼迪斯 / [美]史蒂芬·科特勒 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#互联网 #AI #自我提升 本期听书能为你 1、理解为什么绝大多数人用AI的方式是错的——“用蒸汽机推动旧水车”,只是让原来的流程跑得更快,而不是借助AI做那些过去根本不敢想、没有能力完成的事; 2、分享“AI会让答案廉价,所以好问题更昂贵”的核心洞见,理解在AI时代真正稀缺的不是能力,而是方向、品味和值得回答的问题; 3、了解MIT实验对“认知卸载”的真实测量结果——过早依赖AI会显著削弱大脑的神经连接,学会如何先独立思考、再借助AI放大,而不是反过来。 📡音频:点击收听

❤5👍3

30 Oct 2026, 09:08 UTC≈1,440 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《自我突围》 ——冯仑x施一公:怎样做一个“现实的理想主义者”? 作者:施一公 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#职业发展 #人物传记 #通勤充电 本期听书能为你 1. 听亲历者讲施一公:解读人冯仑本人认识施一公,亲眼见过他为西湖大学四处奔走、见谁都讲的状态,还给西湖大学捐了款。他带来的不是二手转述,而是一个企业家对另一个理想主义者的第一手观察; 2. 重新理解“理想主义”:跳出“理想vs现实”的非此即彼,看施一公如何把“追求理想,顺便赚钱”活成人生方法论,以及为什么“美好理想一定能赚钱”不是鸡汤; 3. 看一个人如何在至暗时刻完成价值观重建:还原父亲被撞、医院500元押金等待4.5小时才能救人的残忍现实。在残酷的现实中,施一公没有选择怨恨,而是把这份痛苦转化成了改变社会的动力。 📡音频:点击收听

❤1

29 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,430 views2 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《当存钱罐爱上购物车》 ——你是存钱罐,还是购物车?这本书带你重塑“金钱性格”。 作者:[美] 斯科特·瑞克 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#心理学 #理财入门 #个人生活 本期听书能为你 1、理解“支付之痛”的神经科学机制——花钱时大脑岛叶的真实激活,解释了为什么存钱罐说“我就是花不出去手”不是矫情,而是生理事实,帮你和另一半停止互相指责,开始真正理解; 2、分享联名账户的两年追踪实验结论——账户结构如何悄悄把婚姻从“共有型关系"变成"交换型关系”,学会用“联名账户+各自自由预算”的结构,同时保住财务和感情; 3、了解为什么完全的财务透明反而会制造冲突,理解“财务半透明”的健康边界,以及如何把“谈钱”从情绪炸弹变成定期对齐的仪式感对话。 📡音频:点击收听

❤1👍1

28 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,450 views1 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《劝导》 ——简·奥斯汀在百年前总结的女性成长经验,为什么到今天还不过时? 作者:[英国] 简·奥斯汀 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#文学 #小说 #人文艺术 这本书能为你 1.简要叙述《劝导》的故事梗概,感受女主人公安妮波折动荡的生活与情感经历,最终如何找到自己真正的幸福。 2.分析作者奥斯汀通过故事情节体现的女性成长经验,包括谨慎与等待,在人生重大选择节点出现时的重要性;不要盲从于古老的经验,要及时理解,拥抱生活中的变革;以及年轻人,尤其是女性,要积极走出家庭,寻找构建能够支持自己的共同体的重要性。 📡音频:点击收听

❤1

27 Oct 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《切·格瓦拉:革命的一生》 ——他的残忍和理想主义,是同一种东西 作者:[英]乔恩·李·安德森 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#历史 #政治学 #人物传记 本期听书能为你 1.摘下切·格瓦拉的三副面具:左翼的圣徒叙事、右翼的恐怖分子叙事、商业的叛逆符号叙事,看到事实如何被流量和标签反复简化; 2.挖掘切·格瓦拉“极端连贯”的真相:他的残忍和理想主义不是两面,而是同一种逻辑在不同场景下的表现; 3.还原被埋没的真实细节:亲手处决叛徒后,日记里只写了“我有点哮喘发作”——第一手记录,比任何标签都更反映出一个真实的人; 4.揭示“胜利者困境”:古巴革命胜利后,切·格瓦拉发现和平比战争更难——理想在战时能点燃人,在和平年代却可能制造混乱。 📡音频:点击收听

26 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,660 viewsread 9 November 2026
Photo

书名:《识骨寻城》 ——如何从骨骼读出一座城市的真实历史? 作者:[英]布伦娜・哈西特 格式:#mp3 #pdf 分类:#自然科学 #文物考古 #科普 本期听书能为你 1. 本书由科普作家田牧歌解读。他擅长把考古学、人类学领域的前沿研究转化为清晰可感的知识,带你学会用骨头这把钥匙,打开城市发展史上那些文献无法触及的角落。 2. 掌握“识骨”的基本逻辑:腿骨粗壮程度反映劳动方式,牙齿微痕还原饮食结构,骨折愈合角度能判断施暴者的惯用手——每一块骨头,都是当事人一生经历的忠实档案。 3. 见证骨骼如何颠覆城市史的叙事:城市让人口爆炸,却也让人的身体悄悄变差了。 4. 理解骨骼证据如何推动真实改变:结核病侵蚀骨骼的考古证据,揭示了它与城市兴起的深度绑定;火柴厂工人磷中毒导致骨骼坏死的发现,直接推动了有毒物质的立法管控。骨头不只是历史,它还在改写未来。 📡音频:点击收听

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @tingshushare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

桔梗书屋
@JGBOOK · 21,889
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 24 September 2026
📖Telegram数字图书馆
@TG_book_data · 30,465
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 8 September 2026
电影探长 电影解说AI漫剧短剧
@dyjs01 · 45,566
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 17 here — alongside 16 others — read 23 September 2026
PPbuzz | PP分享🧚
@ppbuzz_pro · 37,979
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 1 September 2026
外滩读书会-最新报纸、杂志、财经报告及流行电子书分享
@readingclubus · 28,772
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“每天听本书<听书|课程分享>” (@tingshushare), 13,858 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tingshushare.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.