Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for time to get kinky [18+]

Channel

time to get kinky [18+]

@timetogetkinkyy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,168subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921784277
TypeChannel
Username@timetogetkinkyy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timetogetkinkyy

Growth

1,1651,1701,167.57 August 2026 — 1,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,165 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers1,1687 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,164–1,171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:171,168-1
13 Aug 2026, 16:471,169-1
10 Aug 2026, 16:281,170+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:301,167+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:321,165no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:271,165first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.8%
avg views ÷ 1,168 subscribers
Avg views / post
687
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held7 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,808
Reactions total745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

745 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 522233217637628405528137.7%
custom 531208587319235850723431.4%
custom 531027075558856229823030.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC261 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, как вам cumбэк, кошечки? Песня "То да сё" ооочень catchy, я уже чувствую, как не могу спать, потому что она крутится у меня у голове в 3 часа ночи🥰 Хочу поскорее послушать весь альбом. Кто слушал, какие песни больше всего понравились?

custom 522233217637628405533custom 531208587319235850721custom 531027075558856229819

1 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC607 views92 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подошёл к концу наш с cherryale #go_straight_challenge🤩 Как же приятно было целый месяц отдавать дань силе, красоте и сексуальности женщин в тандеме с не менее интересными мужчинами! Очень освежило наше с вами царство бесконечных dicksов. ❤Большая часть написанных работ уже собрана в этой подборке. Если вдруг не найдёте себя, не расстраивайтесь — мы ещё пополняем список! ❤Работы, опубликованные на Фикбуке, можно так

custom 522233217637628405546custom 531208587319235850725custom 531027075558856229821

30 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC630 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#go_straight_challenge 🪞Анатомия страсти 🖤 для meifú за победу в интерактиве Он мог насытится искусством, которое приносило ему глубочайшее удовлетворение, но насытится Минхо было невозможно. От нежных поцелуев до её задохнувшегося крика, когда она извивалась в его руках — всё сводило его с ума. Он видел рождение вселенной под закрытыми веками, когда впервые погрузился в мокрый жар её тела, принявшего его так, буд

custom 531027075558856229858custom 522233217637628405531custom 531208587319235850730

25 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC891 views152 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

этот Чан 🫳👈 этот Хёнджин

custom 531208587319235850782custom 522233217637628405539custom 531027075558856229831

23 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC874 views122 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#go_straight_challenge Хёнджин/fem!Джисон 🎀My sweet obedient boy💋 В предыдущих отношениях Хани играла одну и ту же роль. И её партнёры тоже никогда не выходили из обычного амплуа. Это всегда была классическая ситуация: мужчина, превосходящий женщину, присваивающий женщину, показывающий над женщиной власть. И женщина, жертвенно распятая под ним. Принимающая, позволяющая и, конечно, кончающая по команде. Это точно н

custom 522233217637628405551custom 531027075558856229836custom 531208587319235850735

21 Jul 2026, 20:13 UTC777 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 531027075558856229815custom 522233217637628405510

21 Jul 2026, 19:36 UTC768 views162 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤍 🖤 Жизнь старательно и беспощадно учила, что ничего не длится вечно, но Минхо думал, что они с Хёнджином... смогли бы. Потому что ему казалось, что Хёнджин был всем, чего он когда-либо хотел, и, что важнее, сам Хёнджин каждым жестом, словом, движением тела показывал, что Минхо — всё, что ему когда-либо было нужно. Но что хуже: быть любимым, но нежеланным или тем, кого страстно хотят, но не любят? Минхо игнорирова

custom 522233217637628405571custom 531027075558856229850custom 531208587319235850741

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @timetogetkinkyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 251,729 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“time to get kinky [18+]” (@timetogetkinkyy), 1,168 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timetogetkinkyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.