Трамп предложил главе UFC Дане Уайту пост пресс-секретаря Белого дома Он также предложил Хабиба Нурмагомедова в качестве помощника пресс-секретаря Белого дома
😁51🤡14❤3💊3💩1🤪1

Channel
@timesportmma
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
69,887subscribers
-2,422 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001741340637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @timesportmma |
| Description | Приветствуем всех поклонников MMA! Мы — ваш главный источник всего, что связано со смешанными боевыми искусствами, также свежие новости о UFC, PFL, Bellator По вопросам сотрудничества @Bloodjob_adm |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/timesportmma |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 14:59 | 69,887 | -77 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:55 | 69,964 | -67 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:31 | 70,031 | -83 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 70,114 | -84 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 70,198 | -143 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:54 | 70,341 | -89 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 70,430 | -94 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:30 | 70,524 | -72 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 70,596 | -180 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 70,776 | -132 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 70,908 | -247 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 71,155 | -115 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 71,270 | -230 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 71,500 | -1,017 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 72,517 | +4,124 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 68,393 | -51 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 68,444 | -44 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 68,488 | -53 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:21 | 68,541 | -62 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 20:44 | 68,603 | first reading |
204 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 197 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 51 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 204 (1 August 2026 – 8 November 2026) |
| Views total | 438,390 |
| Reactions total | 5,038 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,377 reactions across 202 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,906 | 31.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3,625 | 29.3% | |
| 👍 | 1,355 | 10.9% | |
| 🤡 | 1,100 | 8.89% | |
| 🤣 | 600 | 4.85% | |
| 😁 | 313 | 2.53% | |
| 👎 | 230 | 1.86% | |
| 💩 | 187 | 1.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 155 | 1.25% | |
| 😢 | 126 | 1.02% | |
| 😨 | 99 | 0.8% | |
| 🥱 | 88 | 0.711% | |
| 💊 | 62 | 0.501% | |
| 👏 | 61 | 0.493% | |
| 🤪 | 56 | 0.452% | |
| 🥴 | 54 | 0.436% | |
| 💯 | 49 | 0.396% | |
| 🤝 | 49 | 0.396% | |
| 🤮 | 39 | 0.315% | |
| 🖕 | 31 | 0.25% | |
| 28 further kinds | 192 | 1.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timesportmma. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 204 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (5.77%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Трамп предложил главе UFC Дане Уайту пост пресс-секретаря Белого дома Он также предложил Хабиба Нурмагомедова в качестве помощника пресс-секретаря Белого дома
😁51🤡14❤3💊3💩1🤪1
⚡Ислам Махачев принял вызов Колби Ковингтона: «У него нет шансов» «Без проблем. Можно и побороться, и поиграть в падел. И к ста тысячам прибавить ещё сто тысяч. Я думаю, что у него нет шансов, ни в борьбе, ни в паделе, но я не против», – сказал россиянин, общаясь с журналистами на чемпионате мира по самбо в Ташкенте. Также Махачев ответил на вопрос о том, что он думает о недавнем поражении американца, который, явля…
❤22👍5👏3
Posted without readable text
❤22🔥4🤡3🏆1👍1💩1
🤔 Дана Уайт рассказал, что Ислам Махачев дал устное согласие на бой с Карлосом Пратесом, прежде чем в итоге сняться по неизвестным причинам: «Да, была устная договоренность. Мне нравится, когда парни часто дерутся. Будучи чемпионом, я не жду, что ты будешь выходить трижды в год, но дважды было бы неплохо».
❤26🔥7👍2
⚡Пётр Ян раскрыл детали разговора с Мерабом Двалишвили после боя «Подрались, по рукам дали, обменялись парой слов. Вопрос, который он поднимает, связан с историей политики, и понятно, что у него в этом есть недопонимание. Сказал ему: «Почитай немного книжки, может быть, спокойней станешь». Просто люди уезжают за бугор из того места, где идёт какая-то история, и оттуда начинают лить всё, что есть в голове. Езжай домо…
🔥36👍11🤡11❤10❤🔥7🏆2🥴2
⚡О’Мэлли – о возможном реванше с Петром Яном: «Устроит грабёж в мою пользу» «Это будет мой третий реванш, и я знаю, что мне нужно делать для победы. Мне нужно перебить его в стойке, а он будет бороться. Пётр Ян никогда не выходит на бой с планом активно бороться, если только его соперник не «Сахарок». До нашего первого поединка он никогда не боролся так много. Пётр – маленький, невозмутимый воин, которого будет оче…
❤25🤡20😁8🗿2🥱1
💬 Карлос Пратес: «Он струсил... Я собираюсь вернуться и отделать Махачева вдвое жестче, чем собирался раньше. Просто чтобы он усвоил урок и перестал быть таким трусом. UFC были в бешенстве. Им это не понравилось. Если у тебя нет серьезной травмы и ты не покалечен, то выходи и дерись, мужик. Ты за это контракт подписывал. Это твоя работа. Если ты не хочешь драться, оставь свой пояс и на этом всё. Но вместо этого ты…
🤡35👍10❤5🤣2🌚1💩1
Posted without readable text
👍19🤡11❤5⚡2🔥2💩1
⚡Конор Макгрегор объявил, что его следующий поединок по правилам ММА станет последним в карьере.
👎45❤26🤣22💩5🤡4🔥2😁2🥴1
⚡Джошуа Ван открыт к супербою с Петром Яном «Это был бы идеальный вариант, правда? Подраться с Петром Яном за второй пояс. Пётр Ян – один из тех бойцов, за которыми я внимательно следил, когда только начинал свою карьеру, потому что мне очень нравится его стиль. У нас довольно похожие стили ведения боя, поэтому я много наблюдал за ним»
❤🔥69❤11👏4🤣3🤡2🤮1
⚡Ислам Махачев: «Мой следующий бой станет одним из последних в моей карьере. Говорят, что Пратес слишком опасен для меня, а Моралес слишком хорош для меня. Поэтому я хочу встретиться с победителем их поединка и ещё раз доказать всему миру, кто является лучшим бойцом в мире»
❤54👍11🤡5👏3❤🔥1
💬 Алджамейн Стерлинг: "Представь, что ты выигрываешь бой, а судьи говорят, что ты его проиграл. Дана подходит после боя и обещает всё уладить. А потом тебе приходится провести ещё три боя, и ты всё равно остаёшься без титульника, лол. Дичь. Это уже не спорт. Это всё ради развлечения. Времена изменились..."
❤68🤡6💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @timesportmma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@timesportmma edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 11 posts on @timesportmma as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mma time” (@timesportmma), 69,887 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timesportmma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.