Channel
@timesbtc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,407subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001497840956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @timesbtc |
| Created | Between 1 October 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/timesbtc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 2,407 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:11 | 2,411 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 2,412 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
134 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 50.7% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 10.4% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 7.46% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 5.97% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 5.97% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2024 to 16 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timesbtc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2024 to 16 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я одного не могу понять в логике людей, которые строят теории о том, что биткоин не просто может рухнуть по каким-то внешним обстоятельствам (что, конечно, исключать нельзя), а что за этим якобы стоят некие тайные манипуляторы, заинтересованные в его крахе. Но если предположить, что действительно есть некто, кто сосредоточил у себя значительное количество биткоинов и способен влиять на рынок, то зачем такому субъект…
👍10❤5
Краткая история моего портфеля
Если вдруг кто-то решил, что смена формата означает, что канал продали и сейчас идет прогрев - это не так. Я единственный и несменный админ. Давайте знакомиться. Вы ведь тут ради крипты. Поэтому расскажу историю моего портфеля, чтобы было понимание о моем опыте и о том, почему вам может быть интересно читать мои мысли, иногда разбавленные важными новостями. 2013 - Узнал про крипту, фармил BTC через краны. Тогда это…
👍28👏3❤2🔥2😁1
Я вот думаю, как можно всерьез воспринимать идею, что движение крипты зависит от новостей, когда президент США заявляет, что за биткоином будущее и что они будут строить национальный BTC-резерв. Ну а что может быть позитивнее этой новости для роста? Это уже вершина инфоповода, которую сложно переплюнуть без реальных действий. А они в ближайшее время просто физически невозможны из-за огромной бюрократии. Раньше марке…
👍7❤1
Я все-таки большую часть сбережений в BTC фиксану на локальных хаях выше 100k, когда увижу, что реально пошел хайп, а не только измученные криптаны мусолят эти новости в своих чатиках. Потому что если сбудется первый, не самый веселый сценарий из поста выше, то 100k+ - это уже хороший ценник, чтобы сделать себе подушку безопасности на годы жизни. А если вдруг биткоин улетит на миллион долларов, я человек простой - мн…
👍5❤2👌2
📢 #trump Сегодня Трамп сделает заявление по теме инвестиций. Об этом сообщает Bloomberg. В своей соцсети Truth Social он также написал: "Завтрашний вечер будет знаменательным. Я расскажу все, как есть!" Источник @timesbtc
👍6
Если рассматривать биткоин как резервный актив, то возникает вопрос: насколько это вообще рационально, если около 50% всего битка находится на "мертвых" кошельках и кошельках Сатоши Накамото, которого якобы никто не знает? Вопрос риторический. Очевидно, что никто не пойдет на такие риски, закупая его даже по $10,000. Но если они все же решатся на это, значит, у них есть контроль над этими «потерянными» биткоинами. И…
👍10🍾8
💸✴️#BTC #макро уже официально выпущено 94% от общего предложения BTC — Bitcoin Magazine
🤔8👍2
📊🔍#SOL #наблюдение Dune: в сети Solana наблюдается значительное падение объема транзакций
🔥7
📊🔍 #BTC #наблюдение 5 и 6 августа в BTC зафиксирован самый высокий с апреля уровень китовых транзакций — данные Santiment.
🔥3
💥💻 #TON #листинг Binance залистит TON.
🔥5
⚖️👀 #XRP #суд #наблюдение Ripple оштрафован всего лишь на $125 млн по делу SEC — за институциональные продажи, но продажи XRP на бирже признаны законными.
😁3👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @timesbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 712,935 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“₿eginBuy | новости | крипто” (@timesbtc), 2,407 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timesbtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.