Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

月tīmeleśs

@timelessluv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,082subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003743051171
TypeChannel
Username@timelessluv
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 5 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/timelessluv

Growth

1,0821,0891,085.510 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,089 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers10 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,081–1,090 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:261,082-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:421,084-5
10 Aug 2026, 09:451,089no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:311,089first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.0%
avg views ÷ 1,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 May 20269 August 2026)
Views total7,333
Reactions total1,359
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

5,633 reactions across 18 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 7.86% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54652138654552842844437.86%
custom 53212979252072546234207.46%
custom 53484632111023684343836.80%
custom 54653682480547392403766.67%
custom 54653802310134932633085.47%
custom 53485104256778560852564.54%
custom 54315545159941852202544.51%
custom 52423717335702191762334.14%
custom 54631219629790607562324.12%
custom 54719639863815376142274.03%
custom 52400067270085505152193.89%
custom 52423888919645687992033.60%
custom 54630302224776201191833.25%
custom 53480909619918585571672.96%
custom 52423782189708356171562.77%
custom 53688152271670878581282.27%
custom 54652362078751603381272.25%
custom 53481700581095818361252.22%
custom 53237110697623814231172.08%
custom 5429408514109901724781.38%
25 further kinds99817.7%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
95
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 20 we hold a reading for · 90%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timelessluv. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC286 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

хотите рики сводного брата

  1. ПИШИ ЮНИ87%
  2. фу не11%
  3. моя кнопка2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC377 viewsread 10 August 2026

мьюшки, оставьте, пожалуйста, ссылки на работы, где нужно оставить отзыв. я оставлю развёрнутый отзыв 💗

31 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,750 views340 reactions10 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

(⌚️) 18+ oneshot 🤍ith heejake 🤩🤩 "same team, different goal" шесть лет вражды. шесть лет тайных встреч в отелях. шесть лет, которые хисын и джейк называли «просто сексом». пока однажды джейк не сказал «хватит». теперь хисыну придётся выбирать: карьера или единственный человек, которого он когда-либо любил O1 part (the end) 🔒 everything is in the comments…

custom 5240006727008550515219custom 524253970115123364763custom 524263788410361924458

30 Jul 2026, 02:44 UTC≈1,280 views246 reactions3 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

(🎁) 🌟hat with ni-ki 🤩🤩 “pov: ты общалась с ним несколько месяцев, но не знала, что он айдол” one & only part 🔒 everything is in the comments…

custom 5242378218970835617156custom 524235781787618185947custom 524239324276643937143

27 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,490 views367 reactions25 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

(👠) oneshot 🤍ith jake 🤩🤩🤩 один день, один мудак, один разбитый телефон. юна думала, что больше никогда его не увидит. но судьба решила иначе — они будут делить комнату и ненавидеть друг друга. пока однажды юна не заметит, что ненависть стала слишком тёплой... O1 part (the end) 🔒 everything is in the comments…

custom 5242371733570219176233custom 524230237414335423368custom 524247111052351436066

21 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈2,150 views406 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

(💎) 18+ oneshot 🤍ith jay ⭐⭐⭐⭐ рина — избалованная дочь богатого бизнесмена, которая привыкла делать только то, что хочет. её отец нанимает на лето телохранителя — пак джея, бывшего военного с холодным взглядом и стальными принципами. до чего же это все доведет? O1 part (the end) 🔒 everything is in the comments…

custom 5431554515994185220254custom 542940851410990172478custom 542920200778734075974

4 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈3,750 views378 reactions10 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 oneshot w sunghoon — она соглашалась на «просто друзья» — лишь бы он был рядом. он соглашался на «просто друзья» — лишь бы не потерять part O1 (the end) 🔒 everything is in the comments…

custom 5463121962979060756232custom 546301604049560750976custom 546523620787516033867custom 54631488365894313763

23 Jun 2026, 18:06 UTC≈4,230 views325 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎁 # oneshot with # jungwon — ёджон думала, что просто жалеет чонвона. она не знала, что он уже выбрал её. её последнее сообщение — «пошел нахуй, фрик». на следующее утро её тело нашли на детской площадке O1 part (the end) 🔒 everything is in the comments . .

custom 5242388891964568799203custom 524266859741475291560custom 526028115019409543455custom 52402933774208511677

13 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC≈4,160 views382 reactions15 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

au with heeseung 💙 — айрис ненавидела университет, и не верила никому до того момента, пока в её жизни появился профессор ли, который спасет её, и поможет поверить в себя. O1 ; O2 ; O3 ; O4 (the end) everything is in the comments . .

custom 5465213865455284284229custom 546303022247762011974custom 546536824805473924073custom 54651412031985710055custom 54653821551588431671

12 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC≈2,950 views298 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

au with heeseung 💙 — айрис ненавидела университет, и не верила никому до того момента, пока в её жизни появился профессор ли, который спасет её, и поможет поверить в себя. O1 ; O2 ; O3 ; O4 🔒 everything is in the comments . .

custom 5465368248054739240186custom 546538023101349326358custom 546303022247762011952custom 54652138654552842842

9 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC≈3,160 views291 reactions4 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

au with heeseung 💙 — айрис ненавидела университет, и не верила никому до того момента, пока в её жизни появился профессор ли, который спасет её, и поможет поверить в себя. O1 ; O2 ; O3 🔒 everything is in the comments . .

custom 5465380231013493263184custom 546303022247762011954custom 546536824805473924051custom 54652138654552842842

7 Jun 2026, 19:25 UTC≈2,670 views345 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

au with heeseung 💙 — айрис ненавидела университет, и не верила никому до того момента, пока в её жизни появился профессор ли, который спасет её, и поможет поверить в себя. O1 ; O2 🔒 everything is in the comments . .

custom 5465213865455284284210custom 546536824805473924066custom 546538023101349326366custom 54630302224776201193

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @timelessluv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTCAnonymous Poll161 voters

хотите рики сводного брата

  1. ПИШИ ЮНИ87%
  2. фу не11%
  3. моя кнопка2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 986,681 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“月tīmeleśs” (@timelessluv), 1,082 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timelessluv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.