Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

катя шарик .

@timare_0

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

895subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002204438335
TypeChannel
Username@timare_0
Descriptionдля связи @zxvjzxvjzxvj щп https://t.me/+Y-HNupOollE1ZDJi
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/timare_0

Growth

8956 Aug 2026, 08:22 — 895 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 14:18 — 895 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:226 Aug 2026, 14:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 894–896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 14:18895no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:22895first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
87.4%
avg views ÷ 895 subscribers
Avg views / post
782
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
20.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (4 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total7,823
Reactions total1,599
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
341
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,714 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,41852.2%
🥰48017.7%
🙏29911.0%
🍓2459.03%
🍌1234.53%
913.35%
🤯582.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,714reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 17 we hold a reading for · 41%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @timare_0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC398 views181 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

гитлеры. щаща еще чутчут я буду рисвоать политкарикатуры ...........

🥰93🤯4425🍓114🙏4

3 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC358 views64 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я не так давно рисовала гитлеров хотите покажу? .

🥰3516🤯8🙏4🍓1

1 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC480 views127 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓6037🥰30

25 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC995 views148 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

мальчики вы че

🍓9323🍌23🙏71🥰1

24 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC823 views153 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

м) попа)

106🥰2614🍌3🤯2🙏2

22 Jul 2026, 21:32 UTC804 views155 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

103🥰26🍌19🍓7

19 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,250 views251 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

cuando una estrella está a punto de desaparecer brilla en su máximo esplendor antes de apagarse y emerge una nueva

162🙏50🥰31🍓7🍌1

16 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC≈1,020 views193 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

неймар сосидж

🥰11949🙏23🍓2

12 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC951 views141 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

дурак

9522🥰19🍓4🍌1

11 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC968 views157 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

приветка в аск (им не понравилосьб)

116🍌2214🍓4🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @timare_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 393,133 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“катя шарик .” (@timare_0), 895 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timare_0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.