Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тима Белорусских

Channel

Тима Белорусских

@timalovebelorusskih

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,831subscribers

-229 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001314785419
TypeChannel
Username@timalovebelorusskih
Created23 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/timalovebelorusskih

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,83117,10416,967.57 August 2026 — 17,060 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,060 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,068 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,103 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,104 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,101 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,097 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,089 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,070 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,072 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,067 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,065 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,055 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,049 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,045 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,043 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,034 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,037 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,032 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,023 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,013 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,011 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,991 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,964 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,960 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,951 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,928 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,904 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,887 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,873 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,855 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,831 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -229. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,790–17,145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:5616,831-24
16 Sept 2026, 02:5916,855-18
14 Sept 2026, 08:4116,873-14
12 Sept 2026, 16:2116,887-17
10 Sept 2026, 17:3616,904-24
7 Sept 2026, 16:3916,928-23
4 Sept 2026, 20:1616,951-9
3 Sept 2026, 02:1716,960-4
2 Sept 2026, 02:1516,964-27
31 Aug 2026, 23:4816,991-20
31 Aug 2026, 02:1817,011-2
30 Aug 2026, 04:3417,013-10
28 Aug 2026, 08:4217,023-9
27 Aug 2026, 08:1417,032-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:4417,037+3
25 Aug 2026, 11:5217,034-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:0517,043-2
22 Aug 2026, 22:1617,045-4
21 Aug 2026, 08:2817,049-6
20 Aug 2026, 10:0517,055first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 16,831 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,140
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 September 2025 – 31 August 2026)
Views total3,140
Reactions total541
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
45s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

22,568 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤14,59064.6%
🔥2,90412.9%
🥰2,74112.1%
😁6352.81%
👍4311.91%
👏3751.66%
😢2451.09%
🎉2421.07%
🤩2020.895%
😱680.301%
🤯610.27%
🤬500.222%
🤔240.106%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,568 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC≈3,140 views541 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Всех с этим самым - первым сентября! Кидайте - кружки , я тоже буду кидать!

❤359🥰108🔥49😱17😢4👍3😁1

14 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈8,960 views899 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤576🔥155👏80🥰66😁13👍6🎉3

5 Aug 2026, 00:39 UTC≈12,500 views1,009 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Как дела, любимые?

❤658🥰177👍99🔥36🎉14😁11🤩8😱6

16 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC≈20,900 views670 reactionsread 3 September 2026
File

Сторис для поддержки 💚

❤466🔥114🥰66🤩14👏8😁2

16 Jul 2026, 21:03 UTC≈19,000 views738 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Премьера! Тима Белорусских - Мысли На всех площадках band.link/timamysli

❤510🔥123🥰78🤩15👍8🤔4

13 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC≈13,800 views863 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Друзья, новый релиз под названием «Мысли» выйдет уже в эту пятницу🎤 А пока ловите сниппет https://band.link/timamysli - пресейв ссылка На связи 👀

❤593🥰134😁67🔥49🎉9🤯6👏3😱2

26 Feb 2026, 16:09 UTC≈45,200 views1,318 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤837🔥230🥰156🤯36👍19🤩12👏8🎉7

24 Feb 2026, 07:23 UTC≈40,300 views1,243 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А пока чутка ещё зачиливаем ☀️

❤808🔥235🥰156😁26🤬9🎉6🤯3

22 Feb 2026, 14:10 UTC≈28,600 views995 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤630🥰189🔥130👍29🤩14🎉3

22 Feb 2026, 13:35 UTC≈25,400 views1,213 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

С праздником, друзья! И простите меня за всё 🙏🏻

❤838🥰220🔥120🤬10👏7🎉6😁5😱3

19 Feb 2026, 15:54 UTC≈23,200 views952 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤616🔥145🥰122😢38😁10😱10🎉5👍3

10 Feb 2026, 18:16 UTC≈30,700 views1,896 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

….

❤1,210🔥349🥰237👏39🎉21👍12🤯11😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @timalovebelorusskih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тима Белорусских” (@timalovebelorusskih), 16,831 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/timalovebelorusskih.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.