Channel
@tiladabiyotN1
On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
7,063subscribers
-216 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001867984063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiladabiyotN1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiladabiyotN1 |
Education โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @onatiliquiztest/2139714 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC | @tiladabiyotN1/4511 ยท this entry14 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @onatiliquiztest | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 minutes | @onatiliquiztest (5โ1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @onatiliquiztest. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channelโs posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ 60%, no better than a coin flip โ because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 7,063 | -97 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 7,160 | -46 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:21 | 7,206 | -73 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 7,279 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 7,279 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (14 July 2026 โ 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,412 |
| Reactions total | 65 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
78 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 36 | 46.2% | |
| ๐ | 10 | 12.8% | |
| ๐ฅ | 9 | 11.5% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 10.3% | |
| ๐คฃ | 7 | 8.97% | |
| ๐ | 6 | 7.69% | |
| ๐คช | 1 | 1.28% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 78reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lider books nashriyotidan "ONA TILI VA ADABIYOT" fanidan milliy sertifikat kitobimiz xaqida malakali ustozning fikri โก๏ธ To'liq ma'lumot olish uchun: Tel :944911800 โ@lider_books_admin
โค2๐ฅ1
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ Mening oสปquvchilarim aytilgan vazifalarni bajarmay kelsa, men asabiylashmadim, deganimda๐ ๐จโ๐ซ Ustoz: Umid Shomurodov Kanal @Onatiliquiztest
๐10๐คฃ7๐ฅ2โค1๐คช1
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 10-avgust ochiladigan guruhimizning 30% toสปldi. Shoshilamiz, guruh toสปlgach, boshqa oสปquvchi qabul qilinmaydi. ๐ Roโyxatdan oโtish uchun hoziroq murojaat qiling. โ @Kursga_qabuul ๐ +998931336161
โค4
Posted without readable text
Hozir oflayn darsdan ta'tilga chiqqanmiz. Shu sababli darslarimiz onlayn shaklga o'tgan. Guruhda darsni men, Farruh Qarshiyev, olib boraman. Bir oylik narx 70 ming so'm. Qo'shilmoqchi bo'lganlar quyidagi kartaga to'lov qilishlari kerak. Birinchi dars bugun soat 22:00 da boshlanadi. 9860010120897946 Qarshiyev Farruh Chekini @Farruh025 ga yuboring. @tiladabiyotN1
โค8
Ona tili va chet tili yoสปnalishida 62 ta 189 ball mavjud.
โค10๐8
Posted without readable text
โค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅ๐๐๐ โฌ๏ธ Milliy sertifikat testlarida bilamizki, ancha ozgarishlar boสปldi, yangi tip asosida tuzilgan testlar kitobimiz nashrga berildi, tez orada kitob do'konlardan topishingiz mumkin! ๐จโ๐ซ Muallif: Umid Shomurod va Farruh Qarshiyev ๐ Kanal @Onatiliquiztest
๐ฅ6โค2
Posted without readable text
โค3
โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ ๐ Kanalimiz kuzatuvchilari uchun eng yangi chiqayotgan test kitobimizdan bir shingil. โ Muallif: Umid Shomurodov โฌ๏ธ Kanal @Onatiliquiztest
๐6โค3๐ฅฐ1
โค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅ๐๐๐ โ Milliy sertifikat kuzgi imtihon uchun B guruhimiz oสปquvchilarga guruh linki berish boshlandi, sizda hali guruhga qoสปshilish imkoni bor, guruh toสปlgach yangi oสปquvchi qabul qilinmaydi... โฌ๏ธ Murojaat: @Kursga_qabuul ๐ Aloqa: +998931336161
โค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅโค๏ธโ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ MILLIY SERTIFIKAT KURSI UCHUN QABUL BOSHLANDI! ๐๐๐ Ona tili va adabiyot fanidan yuqori natija olishni istaysizmi? ๐ฏ Unda sizni "Tafakkur" jamoasining yangi guruhiga taklif qilamiz! โ Eng yangi formatdagi darslar; โ RASH tizimidagi diagnostik testlar; โ Muntazam tahlillar va amaliy mashg'ulotlar; โ Esse yozish bo'yicha to'liq tayyorgarlik; โ Tajribali ustozlar ko'magida sifatli ta'lim; ๐จโ๐ซ Usโฆ
โค1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @tiladabiyotN1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 193,548 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐'๐ง๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ก๐ | Farruh Qarshiyevโ (@tiladabiyotN1), 7,063 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiladabiyotN1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.