Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 42 days, net +1,948. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,402–10,967 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 04:00
10,646
+15
16 Sept 2026, 20:59
10,631
+23
15 Sept 2026, 01:58
10,608
-12
13 Sept 2026, 11:15
10,620
-20
11 Sept 2026, 15:01
10,640
-23
8 Sept 2026, 23:16
10,663
-6
5 Sept 2026, 15:56
10,669
-2
3 Sept 2026, 13:19
10,671
+6
2 Sept 2026, 04:38
10,665
-4
1 Sept 2026, 01:36
10,669
+5
31 Aug 2026, 02:12
10,664
-3
30 Aug 2026, 04:25
10,667
+21
29 Aug 2026, 03:57
10,646
+33
28 Aug 2026, 03:43
10,613
+69
27 Aug 2026, 02:05
10,544
+153
26 Aug 2026, 03:13
10,391
+35
25 Aug 2026, 01:44
10,356
+36
23 Aug 2026, 15:48
10,320
+17
22 Aug 2026, 00:46
10,303
+41
20 Aug 2026, 18:03
10,262
first reading
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 10,646 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,860
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
71 (5 August 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
46,350
Reactions total
769
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Sept 2026, 20:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 48s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,465 reactions across 70 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,778
62.2%
💘
329
7.37%
custom 5393421416928407161
234
5.24%
🌭
220
4.93%
👍
155
3.47%
😍
132
2.96%
😱
126
2.82%
🗿
99
2.22%
😁
94
2.11%
😢
69
1.55%
👏
52
1.16%
💯
41
0.918%
💔
36
0.806%
🤯
36
0.806%
🦄
21
0.47%
custom 5377602262103257073
17
0.381%
🕊
10
0.224%
🤬
10
0.224%
🌚
4
0.09%
💅
2
0.045%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ШТУКАТУРКА 🚧🦺⛑️
На 1,2,3-ие ролики штукатурка на второй рабочий день (первый день снимала во влог на ютуб), на 4-ом ролике результат штукатурки за второй день работы, 5-ое и 6-ое видео — работа на третий день
✔️ Считай почти закончили коридор, осталась одна стена, но она «опасная», на нее будет сильно попадать дождь с уличной стороны, поэтому сделаем ее цементной штукатуркой на всякий случай чтобы не плесневела
❗️…
Всем привет, я немного пропала в ежедневной штукатурке стен. У нас уже готова спальня + коридор!
Неожиданно для себя открыли быстрый способ штукатурки стен и зафигачили коридор/прихожую за три дня
А это мне соседка привезла инжир! Мой любимый фрукт 🍇 или ягода 🧺✨
Микроволновку я нашла у нас в магазине GORGIA по скидкам за 149 лари (4.700 руб)
На маркетплейсах таких бюджетных цен нет, поэтому берите на заметку искать товары офлайн, это оказывается полезно 😂
🍱 Микроволновка как у нас, но другого бренда арт.ВБ: 594326910 (красного цвета нет в наличии, но другие суперские)
✨ Винтажная микруха которую я планировала купить, пока не нашла свою: арт.ВБ: 727217904
🫖 Чайник, которы…
Перделка летней кухни официально закончена! Урааа! 🧺🥨🐢
Вот в чем преимущество быть подписанным на мой тг-канал для любителей нашего ремонта. Эту кухню мы строили 4 дня и я все сюда транслировала, а пока руки дойдут до монтажа, пока опубликую… долгая песня. А вы уже наслаждаетесь результатами
Чуть позже дам ссылки на новинки ✌️
А теперь, владельцы электрического камина, скажите 🔥✨
Не будет ли опасно ставить его на ламинат и не будет ли опасно, что сзади камина будет большая розетка на 4 выхода, к которой возможно будет много чего подключено? 🧐
Ну ешкин кошкин, что ты будешь делать!
Тумба под тв отправляется на первый этаж, а сюда идет камин! (найти бы его еще в магазинах)
Только вот мы розетку не сделали на верху под тв, а муж говорил мне ДАВАЙ СДЕЛАЕМ, а я говорю ТА НЕ ЗАЧЕМ ВИД ПОРТИТЬ 😂
Фух, слава богу попрощались со старым диваном из палетов и обрели эстетичный набор уличной мебели 🥳🍀
4-ое и 5-ое фото это ДО/ПОСЛЕ, ну очень круто, на таких сиденьях и насекомые не страшны
Это еще не вся переделка, завтра утром доделаю кухню и смонтирую готовый ролик ⛑️
К вопросу о том, как мы будем зимой — я вообще о камине мечтаю! Камин хочу!
Сначала мы думали что наш дом огромный и камин влезет, но сейчас понимаем что не особо. Настоящий на первый этаж так точно не поместится, если только фейковый электрический 🔥
Ну а на первый этаж я точно поставлю буржуйку со стеклянной открывашкой
💘32❤21🌭2custom 53934214169284071612
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @tiktokladyspitsti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Панченко Людмила @Lyudmilapanchenkoph · 50,227 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даша Гриб” (@tiktokladyspitsti), 10,646 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiktokladyspitsti.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.