Channel
@tiesiogiai
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
1,414subscribers
-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001434823519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tiesiogiai |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tiesiogiai |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 19:29 | 1,414 | +3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 1,411 | -4 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:08 | 1,415 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 1,416 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:46 | 1,420 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 1,417 | -2 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 1,419 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:04 | 1,422 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 1,420 | -2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 1,422 | -10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 1,432 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 1,431 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:40 | 1,430 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:15 | 1,434 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 1,442 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 1,446 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 1,450 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 1,455 | +4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 1,451 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 1,452 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 34.1% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 22.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 12.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚾️ MLB 🔥 St. Louis Cardinals vs Colorado Rockies 🎯 Pick: St. Louis Cardinals win 💰 Odds: 1.70 🧠 Short Analysis: St. Louis gets a favorable home matchup at Busch Stadium and has the stronger recent profile. Kyle Leahy has been reliable on the mound, while the Cardinals have also shown better form than Colorado and remain motivated by the Wild Card race. 📊 Key points: ✅ St. Louis has the important home-field advant…
⚡1❤1👍1
⚾️ MLB 🔥 Philadelphia Phillies vs Toronto Blue Jays 🎯 Pick: Philadelphia Phillies -1 (Asian Handicap) 💰 Odds: 1.60 🧠 Short Analysis: Philadelphia has a clear advantage in the starting pitching matchup. Zack Wheeler combines a strong ERA with an excellent WHIP, while Toronto’s lineup has historically struggled against him. On the other side, José Soriano’s weaker numbers give the Phillies more opportunities to creat…
⚡1❤1👍1
⚾️ MLB 🔥 Boston Red Sox vs Athletics 🎯 Pick: Boston Red Sox -1.5 💰 Odds: 1.77 🧠 Short Analysis: This matchup is built around a huge difference in current form and pitching quality. Boston has won eight straight and 26 of its last 29 games, while the Athletics have lost eight in a row and 24 of their last 28. Boston also holds a major advantage in both the starting pitching matchup and the bullpen. 📊 Key points: ✅…
⚡1❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
⚾️ MLB 🔥 Kansas City Royals vs Minnesota Twins 🎯 Pick: Kansas City Royals win 💰 Odds: 1.77 🧠 Short Analysis: Kansas City has the stronger setup for this matchup, led by the excellent recent form of Michael Wacha. The Royals starter has allowed only four runs across 19 innings in his last three outings, while Minnesota enters after four consecutive defeats. Bailey Ober also faces the same Royals lineup for the third…
🔥 Ar Vilniaus „Žalgiris“ nustebins prieš „Hajduk“? 💣 Vilniaus „Žalgiris“ atliks bent 5 smūgius į vartų plotą 💰 Kof.: 3.00 💣 „Hajduk Split“ pelnys įvartį pirmu bandymu smūgiuojant į vartų plotą 💰 Kof.: 3.50 Pirmasis pasirinkimas atrodo ypač įdomiai. Namuose „Žalgiris“ dažniausiai žaidžia drąsiau, o tokio lygio rungtynėse tikėtina, kad komanda ieškos savo progų ir bandys kuo dažniau grasinti varžovų vartams. 5 smūgi…
⚾️ MLB 🔥 Cleveland Guardians vs New York Mets 🎯 Pick: Under 8 Runs 💰 Odds: 1.71 🧠 Short Analysis: This matchup features two reliable starting pitchers who should limit scoring during the early innings. Nolan McLean has recorded a 3.29 ERA with 148 strikeouts, while Foster Griffin owns a 3.06 ERA and an impressive 12-3 record. Although the Mets have scored well in this series, the strong pitching matchup favors a lo…
Photo, posted without a caption
💵 Yesterday’s Free 3/3 | Value Bets 📈 💵 ✅ 1.78 - Houston Astros vs Toronto Blue Jays - Houston Astros to Win ✅ 1.80 - Philadelphia Phillies vs Washington Nationals - Philadelphia Phillies -1.5 ✅ 1.77 - Boston Red Sox vs Chicago White Sox - Boston Red Sox to Win
❤2⚡1👍1🔥1
🔥 Ar Vilniaus „Žalgiris“ nustebins prieš „Hajduk“? 💣 Vilniaus „Žalgiris“ atliks bent 5 smūgius į vartų plotą 💰 Kof.: 3.00 💣 „Hajduk Split“ pelnys įvartį pirmu bandymu smūgiuojant į vartų plotą 💰 Kof.: 3.50 Pirmasis pasirinkimas atrodo ypač įdomiai. Namuose „Žalgiris“ dažniausiai žaidžia drąsiau, o tokio lygio rungtynėse tikėtina, kad komanda ieškos savo progų ir bandys kuo dažniau grasinti varžovų vartams. 5 smūgi…
⚡2❤2👍1🔥1
⚾️ MLB 🔥 Arizona Diamondbacks vs San Diego Padres 🎯 Pick: San Diego Padres win 💰 Odds: 1.80 🧠 Short Analysis: San Diego looks like the more complete team heading into this divisional clash. The Padres strengthened their roster before the trade deadline, while Arizona remained relatively quiet. On the mound, Casey Mize brings a clear edge over rookie Mitch Bratt, who has struggled badly in his first MLB appearances.…
⚡2❤2👍1🔥1
✅✅✅ Day closed without any losses, 3rd win in a row, CONGRATULATIONS! 🤑
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tiesiogiai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗩𝗔𝗟𝗨𝗘 𝗕𝗲𝘁𝘀 📈” (@tiesiogiai), 1,414 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tiesiogiai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.