Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 天仙子

Channel

天仙子

@tianxianzi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,681subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879759561
TypeChannel
Username@tianxianzi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tianxianzi

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6811,7041,692.57 August 2026 — 1,704 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,704 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,702 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,700 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,699 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,697 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,693 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,692 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,689 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,690 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,686 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,683 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,681 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,678–1,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:151,681-2
11 Sept 2026, 21:011,683-3
7 Sept 2026, 01:401,686-4
2 Sept 2026, 08:581,690+1
30 Aug 2026, 08:221,689-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:441,692-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:091,693-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:131,697-2
14 Aug 2026, 06:481,699-1
11 Aug 2026, 09:051,700-2
8 Aug 2026, 08:221,702-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:031,704no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:031,704first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

754 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤44358.8%
🥰13417.8%
🎉8010.6%
👍425.57%
🍾222.92%
🤔81.06%
👏50.663%
😘50.663%
☃40.531%
😢40.531%
🤣40.531%
🙉10.133%
🤗10.133%
🫡10.133%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 754 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 February 2025 to 21 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2025, 01:45 UTC≈7,850 views91 reactionsread 7 August 2026

今天是黄前久美子生日,大家一起说久美子生日快乐!

🎉80❤6🥰3🤔2

3 Aug 2025, 16:26 UTC≈9,570 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

『爱在黎明破晓前』,完全由对话撑起来的一部电影,聊穿整场。剧情是虚构的,爱情是虚构的,但是对话是真的,虽然没有进行过这样漫长的对话,但我能想象出来这样的对话会在不同的场景在不同的刚刚相遇的情侣之间发生很多次。里面有一段拍摄餐厅里不同客人的交谈的片段,看完后觉得,原来谈话是这样无趣的事,哪怕讲话当时在场的人觉得是真诚的,但从更遥远的尺度来看,都只是特定场合下的处于特定心理动机的陈词滥调而已。那么,爱,究竟从何而来、如何发生呢。谈话究竟是调味剂,还是关系本身呢。 这部片最吸引我的倒不是他们讲了什么,因为我脑子比较小,等他们讲完我也基本忘了,但是那种不断地讲话、不断地四处游荡至天亮的行为确实很吸引我。我甚至在看电影的时候就在想象自己也可以这样穿过大街小巷消磨时间至通宵,甚至都不用说跟谁在一起,哪怕只是自己一个人这样做,也会很有意思。日子与日子是相似的,但是可能就在某一天,故事机器启动,我们就走进了世界的另一面。或许爱情之所以吸引人,…

❤30🤣4👍1🤔1

2 Aug 2025, 11:33 UTC≈8,060 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

去二刷了,这部片不能简单归于商业片,它有着文艺片的骨,和动画片特有的肉,最外面才是商业片的皮。 最里层是剧本设计,其实第一遍看的时候我就有被一开始的会馆屠杀和后面的基地屠杀给震慑,小孩子们可能没什么感觉,但是接触过死亡的大人会真得从中感受到莫名恐怖。这种恐怖不来自于感官,而来自于意识。战争片一样血浆肢体到处都是是能直接唤醒我们的恐惧和愤怒的,这是生理性的对受伤的畏惧,但是这部片里没有,这部片里的死亡简直轻描淡写,人或者妖精都是一瞬间就毙命了。但片子里的生灵却又很重,即便是喜剧片,里面的角色并不是背景化的、不是喜剧要素本身和载体,他们是和我们一模一样的生灵,我们会在意识上会对他们的死感受到恐惧。作品对战争、死亡与创伤的探讨非常克制,它们并不是被用来激起我们各种情绪的工具。很多商业片里情绪会被用作工具,作品需要挑逗观众的情绪来赋予叙事的合法性。而罗小黑这部作品并不是这样,它的叙事凌驾于情绪之上,世界就是这样运作的,它只是把某些残酷…

❤22

27 Jul 2025, 14:34 UTC≈6,640 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

应当怎样度过自己的一生,应当以什么心态迎接每一天的生活,这完全取决于我们自己的主观能力,也是我们自己的责任所在。没有任何人有能力、有义务帮我们去决定,不能期冀别人、不能期冀命运、不能被动接受,只有靠自己双手主动创造的世界才是值得信赖的。我们在社会化的过程中已经交出了太多的主动权,现在必须要一项一项地要回来。 尽管有许多现实的和精神上的枷锁,但我们仍然是自由的,那些身体记忆深处的焦虑、不安和抑郁并不属于我们,我们也无需照顾它们。生命意志只有前进与创造这唯一途径。不进则退,与现实所造成的巨大创伤混在一起,生命意志中蕴含的巨大能量会加深这种创伤。事情是做不完的,责任是担不完的,痛苦也是经历不完的,身体机能会变差,创伤会累积,麻烦会越来越多,反刍会越来越熟练,要走出这样螺旋下坠的过程,就只能大步迈过这样废墟一般的心灵与身体,不能回头。

❤65☃4🍾3👍1🤔1

26 Jul 2025, 17:30 UTC≈5,840 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

昨晚骑着小电驴送朋友回酒店的时候,刚下过雨的街道闻起来潮潮的,蝉鸣声一声比一声深,夏天这个词很具体地出现在我的意识中。可是这段时间我就像是纵欲过度的人一样,消耗光了所有的快乐因子。我能感受到有什么美好的东西在我眼前飞过,但我已经过于疲倦。酒精、美食、工作、谈天、阅读、观影,我已经一点注意力和时间都匀不出来了。我对一切正在发生的事情都被感压力,被动地消化这一切,哪怕它们之中许多本来应该是令人愉悦的事情。

❤41🤔2🤗1🙉1

24 Jul 2025, 16:11 UTC≈5,690 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026

第一次用日语读完了一本轻小说,值得记录一下。小说前面三分之一还会经常查些词,而且会有 ChatGPT 来分析语法,但是读到后面就越读越快、查词和查句的频率越来越低,一方面是作者会重复用词、眼熟的词越来越多,另一方面是自己对日语的句法也慢慢熟悉了起来,看到一句话后脑海中会很自然地把句子划分词组、结构。我学日语断断续续的,花的时间不算多,所以基础不算扎实。读到后面我总感觉好像有些词没有读懂,但是又出乎意料地完全能明白作者在写什么。可能因为在我脑中,日语和中文并没有建立强映射,读过最初的日语教材后就开始用日语来学习日语了,所以在阅读的时候也并不以翻译的形式阅读,而是以日语语境来阅读日语。但拿英语阅读比较来说,用英语读作品时我是真有在用英语思考、能体察到英语的节奏和质感,对读进去的东西印象深很多,也能用英语复述、再加工。而自己日语水平远远低于英语水平,日语只是在我光滑的大脑表面光滑地划过,只留下了浅浅的语义。这种感觉很奇妙。我还没训练过…

❤41👍9

23 Jul 2025, 15:00 UTC≈4,960 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://movie.douban.com/subject/1303521/ 『特写』,伊朗的电影。手段非常高明的电影,看的时候我都不知道导演到底是谁了。分不清哪些是真实的、哪些是虚构的,哪些是真诚的、哪些是欺骗的,叙事、叙事者与叙事手法看似确凿无疑,但其中都暗含欺骗、含混不明,所有人都是在还原真实事件的真实出境、但所有人又都是演员,似乎只有庭审那里是真实的实时录像,但是在镜头面前大家又何尝不是在演戏,哪怕是扮演自己。回来后看导演的讲述,竟然连庭审那部分都有很多欺骗的部分……什么魔术师……影片本身的内容很简单,故事中的人物也足够简朴、思想与情感动机也并不复杂,但是故事本身的符号象征足够丰富,而且戏里戏外相呼应,对立面相互转化,容纳许多相互交织的讨论,是部神奇的好电影。左右两个人都看睡着了,不知道梦到了什么,突然惊醒顿了一下,把我吓一跳。

❤8

22 Jul 2025, 15:46 UTC≈4,370 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://book.douban.com/subject/35900190/ 『在绝望之巅』 齐奥朗在二十二岁写的作品。说实话哲学式的用语还是有点难读懂,我还不太适应满篇满篇的长难句。不过大概的感觉是,这是用泪写就的诗篇。来自身体的焦虑冲动比来自大脑的熟练思考更为感人,忧郁是来自于感官器质上的不协调感。虽然任何年龄段的人都会有身体上的痛苦引出的形而上的思考,但或许只有非常年轻的人会孤立出这种思考,不断推敲琢磨它,把一切都绝对化,反过来又进一步造成了感官器质上的不协调。

❤11

21 Jul 2025, 14:01 UTC≈4,880 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://book.douban.com/subject/35094678/ 『黑魔法手帖』,好家伙……卡拉巴教义写的真好,这些古代农民宗教怎么有这么高的文学水准……这本书算是一些跟黑魔法相关的博物学书籍吧,主要是收集一些趣闻轶事的,至于到底是不是真的,他倒是给了比较明确的引文,但那些引文也可能是编的。稍有文学趣味,不过还是以博物学为主。本来想要抓一只魔鬼上来聊天,但是看完书感觉它们太封建了,算了。

❤6🥰2

20 Jul 2025, 04:21 UTC≈4,560 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

早上醒来,下雨,意识仍旧停留在昨日,看着窗外的雨水,心中久违地闪过休息日的轻快感受。起来重新看了凉宫的最后一集 Someday in the rain。看完以后也不知道应该干什么,不想浪费这样的天气,但也最多只能给自己宽容到午后,因为还有许多事情要做。 在这样的休息日的白天,吃完午饭躺回床上,想着离开网络上各种各样的信息源,生活其实很空旷,空旷到什么都没有。但是我自己本身是那么的无趣。如果不用什么叙事将自己占满,又该如何面对这漫长的生活。又或者说本来隐隐是有想做什么的念头,但一直也只是把它错误地消耗在我并不真正感兴趣的信息上。就像欲望的载体并不等同于欲望本身,错误的载体只是在这段时间里占据了思维的频道而已。有些尚且处于萌芽期的情绪,或许因为找寻不到方向,便被永久搁置了。或许生命活力就是这样一簇一簇的不知如何命名的情绪,而干涸的生活模式只会将它们一一忽略,于是我们不依赖于别人制造的叙事便活不下去,因为我们没有能力命名那些只属于我…

❤46😢4👍3

19 Jul 2025, 17:00 UTC≈4,320 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://movie.douban.com/subject/36185502/ 『长安的荔枝』,整体来说还是可以看的,煽情但不拖沓、也不回避将矛头往最高权力机构直指。拍历史片还是有长处的,毕竟借古讽今这个手法用起来相对自由。但它本质上是一部简单的电影,缺点也有很多,剧本有不少为了加剧冲突而故意设置的不合理的地方、笑点也很刻意、还有些说不上来为什么要加进来的现代元素,似乎导演是在历史正剧和喜剧之间摇摆,最后选了一个先是热热闹闹的当代八股喜剧的翻版、最后终成传统悲剧的结局,其中许多手段似乎是把「人」想得太简单了一些。我觉得不如直接做成正剧,像『大明王朝1566』那样,反正喜剧部分也不太行,而且既然追求现实感,那就把现实感贯彻到底。但要真做成正剧可能对导演的要求就要高很多了,有些东西不是设立典型形象、设置典型冲突、加点反派再加点人尽皆知的政治口号、最后再加点样板戏笑点就能糊弄过去的,「历史是无情对无脑的胜利」,而我们在影院所做…

🥰12❤3

18 Jul 2025, 15:11 UTC≈3,940 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://movie.douban.com/subject/36448279/ 非常成熟的动画类型片(猫片+动作片),节奏利索,笑点自然,打戏出色,放类型片里也是第一梯队的(不仅局限于国内),更重要的是有超级无敌可爱的小黑加成。其实上一部讲的啥我已经完全忘了,就记得小黑非常可爱,想rua。这部片完全有超出我的预料,虽然同为类型片,但类型片和类型片还是有区别的。相比于那种喊着爱与家庭的片子、友情与羁绊的片子、莫名奇妙就成为救世主的片子、油子成为英雄的片子,我更爱看小黑这样的类型片,无它,清爽不油腻,具体来说,没有过剩的个人意识,主题的探讨点到为止,不煽情,而且不会回避、也不娱乐化痛楚与创伤,把时间都让位给我们观众真正想看的:可爱的小黑、人物的互动、以及绚丽的打戏。

🥰25❤4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tianxianzi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

飛蛾書庫
@MothLib · 34,658
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“天仙子” (@tianxianzi), 1,681 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tianxianzi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.