本频道已开放评论功能,欢迎大家留下自己的评论🤝

Channel
天下会(楼凤报告)
@tianxiahuibg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
13,663subscribers
+250 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001404391153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tianxiahuibg |
| Created | Between 1 February 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 54 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tianxiahuibg |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:38 | 13,663 | -8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 13,671 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:21 | 13,667 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 05:27 | 13,673 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:31 | 13,671 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 13,678 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:50 | 13,677 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 13,680 | +8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 13,672 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 13,670 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 13,675 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:57 | 13,669 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 13,663 | +2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 13,661 | -4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 13,665 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:38 | 13,659 | +10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 13,649 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:50 | 13,651 | +6 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:14 | 13,645 | +3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 13,642 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.5%
- avg views ÷ 13,663 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,570
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.059%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (9 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 23,526 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,010
- Videos
- ≈130
- Links
- ≈1,220
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 9s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 91.3% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1👎1
妹子花名:婉儿 位置:黄泥磅 身高:162 体重:110左右 胸围:F 年龄:30左右 价格:4p7pp 联系方式:@waner2580 ☎️17347667667 报告出处:天下会报告群 https://t.me/tianxiahuiflq 详细评价:抽了个空,和婉儿老师约定时间就去了,很准时,进门,婉儿老师摸着我的手,往她奶子上蹭,软软的,一摸就是天然大奶,洗澡仔细,还挑逗我,大屌硬挺,技术很好,温柔,手法到位,特别毒龙,小舌头一会如蜻蜓点水,一会如翻江倒海,爽的我不要不要的,婉儿老师很会聊天,情绪价值很到位体验感拉满
本频道已开放评论功能,欢迎大家留下自己的评论🤝
Video, posted without a caption
妹子花名:小诺 位置:江北区观府国际小区 身高:165 体重:98左右 胸围:F 年龄:28左右 价格:5p 8pp 联系方式:@xn791213 ☎️13637770581 报告出处:天下会电报群 https://t.me/tianxiahuiflq 详细评价第一次约的时候还是其实挺紧张的,到地方后也会想会不会很尴尬,然后我提前到了,老师也很好让我提前进去。刚看到老师时候,整个人气质就很放松,笑起来很自然,完全没有压迫感。身材真的很好,曲线很明显,胸很大也很饱满,穿着衣服就已经很有冲击力了。 见面后她会先简单聊几句,感觉很会照顾情绪,很快就把我的紧张感化解了。帮我洗澡很温柔,很舒服,服务过程中很有耐心,也很主动,节奏掌控得很好,该温柔的时候温柔,该热情的时候也不含糊,非常有技术,手法到位。整个过程很舒服,完全没有那种敷衍的感觉,结束后还会关心一下,体验非常不错。 整体来说人很年轻漂亮、身材超级无敌好、服务到位,卫生也干净,…
本频道已开放评论功能,欢迎大家留下自己的评论🤝
Photo, posted without a caption
妹子花名:永丽 位置:大学城微电园 身高:157 体重:102 胸围:C 年龄:33 价格:快餐3米,全套4米一次,5米两次,包夜10米2-3次 联系方式:电报 @C313888,电话15310620528 报告出处:天下会电报群https://t.me/tianxiahuiflq 详细评价:整体体验极佳,家里环境舒适,一入门看见靓丽的妹儿,心情澎湃,像狼看见小白兔一样,哥们儿都懂塞。 妹儿和照片上差不多,本人看起更好看些,身材比例都是男人的最爱。胸又大又白,很翘,手感及好。 妹儿态度很好,很温柔,带着你去浴室洗澡,帮你全身沐浴,过程如皇帝般服务。 出浴室会帮你把水珠擦干,温柔的请你上床,手指优先给全身做个按摩,又痒又舒服,再用她那软舍尖给你周身慢慢的舔,舔 蛋蛋,口包二弟,这种感觉说不出来的多爽。做爱全程配合,姿势多,水多,粉红色,一看就知道才下水。做完会帮你清洁,贴心体贴关心你出门注意保暖等。总结:整个过程轻松加愉快,服务点…
本频道已开放评论功能,欢迎大家留下自己的评论🤝
Photo, posted without a caption
妹子花名:熙宝 位置:大坪 身高:163 体重:110 胸围:C+ 年龄:30 价格:快餐2米,全套3米,包夜10米 联系方式:电报 @xibao1224,电话18723500384 报告出处:天下会电报群https://t.me/tianxiahuiflq 详细评价:老师的声音就迷到我了,很温柔,软软的,一进门就抱住我,感觉像久别的恋人,给我一种女朋友的感觉,技术也是非常的好,特别是那勾人的眼神,咬唇🫦,简直就像片里的感觉一样,情绪价值拉满!真的很棒的一次
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @tianxiahuibg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tianxiahuibg edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent edit
- 4 November 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tianxiahuibg named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“天下会(楼凤报告)” (@tianxiahuibg), 13,663 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tianxiahuibg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.