3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,643–3,649 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 00:31
3,648
+4
8 Aug 2026, 00:00
3,644
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:53
3,644
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
2m 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
432 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
117
27.1%
🔥
111
25.7%
❤
103
23.8%
❤🔥
67
15.5%
🎉
14
3.24%
👏
7
1.62%
⚡
6
1.39%
🆒
3
0.694%
👌
2
0.463%
👎
1
0.231%
🤨
1
0.231%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 432reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thrombosis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,230
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,410
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 14 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
🧬 Тромбофилия плохо влияет 🧬
...на проходимость венозного стента, но это неточно.
В то время как механизмы развития стеноза и окклюзии венозного стента остаются не до конца изученными, а большинство экспертов по венозной дезобструкции приходят к выводу, что приток намного важней антикоагуляции, группа авторов из Голландии в июльском номере EJVES представила свое видение данной проблемы.
Они провели ретроспективн…
🖥️ Добро пожаловать 🖥️
…на обновленный образовательный портал Phlebo-Class.ru!
Отныне здесь мы будем проводить все активности в рамках проектов по ХЗВ и ВТЭО (включая Школу Тромбоза).
Сюда переехал лекционный курс Школы Тромбоза, возможность подписки на который откроется в ближайшее время. Также здесь будут появляться новые образовательные модули по ХЗВ и доказательной медицине, разработку которых мы начинаем в бл…
❤️ Профилактика ВТЭО ❤️
…с помощью гиполипидемических препаратов.
Как известно, гиполипидемическая терапия обладает плейотропным действием, в рамках которого реализуется эффект первичной профилактики ВТЭО различной величины в зависимости от препарата и интенсивности лечения. До сих пор это явление было зарегистрировано для статинов и ингибиторов PCSK9, а изучению не подвергалась только бемпедоевая кислота — относ…
💊 Почему не работает ривароксабан? 💊
На интересные размышления и изыскания натолкнул меня пришедший на рецензию коротенький китайский кейс. Там 17-летний юноша заболел головой, по поводу чего ему выполнили МРТ и нашли тромбоз мозговых синусов на фоне дефицита протеина С. Но помимо стандартного функционального анализа, также выполнили генетическое типирование, обнаружив один конкретный из 300+ возможных полиморфизм…
🧦 Компрессионная терапия снова проиграла 🧦
...,проксимальному ТГВ по возможности снижения риска развития ПТБ.
Но, на этот раз, виной оказалась не низкая комплаентность, а пандемия COVID-19. Возможно, вы помните заявленное Alun Davies очередное (в дополнение к GAPS и PETS) исследование компрессионной терапии CHAPS, по поводу которого через основные флебологические сообщества проводились рассылки с предложением при…
🐟 Корректор гемостаза из спермы лосося 🐟
... - это протамина сульфат.
Именно такая интересная информация содержится в свежей обзорной статье, опубликованной в NEJM в июне 2026 года, систематизирующей данные по всем доступным и перспективным антидотам инактиваторам антикоагулянтов. Тема приобрела особую актуальность после отзыва андексанета альфа с рынка США в декабре 2025 года, что существенно изменило подходы к …
🩸Парадокс уремии: почему ривароксабан при терминальной ХБП усилил кровотечения, но не снизил ССО?
В продолжение поста Кирилла Викторовича об исследовании TRACK — рассуждения о том, почему этот результат был, возможно, предсказуем.
🔑 Ключ — в уникальной патофизиологии гемостаза при уремии. У этих пациентов кровотечения и тромбозы идут через разные механизмы, и именно поэтому классические антикоагулянты попадают в лову…
😞 Ривароксабан 2,5 мг не работает при терминальной ХБП 😞
..., по крайней мере, без обязательной комбинации с аспирином в отношении риска ССО, но все еще снижает частоту ВТЭО.
Именно к такому выводу пришли авторы двойного-слепого плацебо-контролируемого исследования TRACK, результаты которого были опубликованы в JAMA 4 июня 2026 года.
Они включили 1458 из 1900 запланированных пациентов с терминальной ХБП (СКФ ≤…
🩸Парадокс эссенциальной тромбоцитемии: тромбозы + кровотечения одновременно - по мотивам интересного вопроса для гематологов
Эссенциальная тромбоцитемия (ЭТ) — клональное миелопролиферативное заболевание, при котором костный мозг производит слишком много тромбоцитов. Казалось бы, больше тромбоцитов = лучше свёртывание. Но в реальности пациенты с ЭТ страдают и от тромбозов (артериальных — 11%, венозных — 7%), и от кро…
🧬 Генетические дефекты тканевого фактора 🧬
... встречаются очень редко и, кажется, не влияют на риски тромбоза и кровотечения.
До недавнего времени ТФ считался «неприкосновенным» для генетических аномалий, однако после обнаружения точечных мутаций его генов, в журнале Blood вышло исследование об их влиянии на гемостаз.
Для создания и характеристики миссенс (однонуклеотидные замены с нарушением структуры белка, н…
🎉 Поздравляем Илью Вениаминовича 🎉
Сегодня у нас не будет научного контента, т.к. вчера состоялась блестящая защита докторской диссертации Счастливцева Ильи Вениаминовича. Поэтому мы будем просто принимать поздравления 🥳
Ранее защищеная диссертация Кирилла Викторовича и свежезащищенная работа Ильи Вениаминовича - это результаты десятилетий работы над улучшением подходов к диагностике, лечению и профилактике веноз…
🧪 Из интересного - Байесовский подход к диагностике ГИТ II
Проблема
Золотой стандарт подтверждения ГИТ II — функциональные тесты (SRA — тест высвобождения серотонина, HIPA — тест гепарин-индуцированной активации тромбоцитов). Но в реальности они доступны в единичных лабораториях, требуют донорских тромбоцитов и радиоизотопов, а результат — через дни или неделю. Всё это время врач вынужден решать: менять антикоагулян…
🔥10❤4❤🔥3🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thrombosis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 424,356 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Thrombosis School (Школа Тромбоза)” (@thrombosis), 3,648 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thrombosis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
