https://x.com/tpmofficial2021/status/1937011767995224416?s=46&t=JIRomZwfItN1SFLq07RhKQ
Channel
ThisPivotalMoment
@thispivotalmoment
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
2,485subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001535177690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @thispivotalmoment |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 24 November 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/thispivotalmoment |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 2,485 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:08 | 2,492 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 2,493 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 2,495 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 2,498 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,503 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 2,507 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 2,510 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 2,514 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:50 | 2,518 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,518 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13m 49s
- Average length
- 3m 27s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
What did you think of Bret Weinstein’s appearance on Alex Jones? I didn’t have that on my ‘Things to expect in 2024’ bingo card!
https://x.com/tpmofficial2021/status/1755776729568907626?s=46&t=JIRomZwfItN1SFLq07RhKQ
UPDATE: I’m working extremely hard on the new project. It’s an enormous and challenging piece of work but has absolutely incredible potential too, so it’s worth the all the effort. Super excited to share it with you all when it’s finished. No fixed timelines yet but I’m making solid progress. A future worth passing on to our descendants is a future worth fighting for! Watch this space. You’ll hear about it here first…
Bret Weinstein has been on the receiving end of an enormous amount of flak from some surprising directions following his interview on Tucker Carlson. This short video goes into it.
https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1732382572385362352?s=46&t=JIRomZwfItN1SFLq07RhKQ
A Price Worth Paying? Thoughts on the current situation in Gaza.
I've turned this article into a quick video essay. Please excuse the AI-generated voiceover. https://youtu.be/bGlEka1Pd20
So where will the events in Israel lead? I don’t know, no mere mortal does, but sadly, sickeningly, horrifyingly, the best we can hope for at this stage is for the carnage to stay localised and mutual exhaustion to quickly lead to an uneasy cessation of hostilities. However, my gut tells me these events have an Archduke Franz Ferdinand feel about them and we may be about the enter the next phase of a multigenerationa…
There is an expression attributed to Saul Alinsky, the author of ‘Rules for Radicals’, that ‘the real action is the enemy’s reaction.’ As we witness, in horror, the sickening barbarity of what occurred in Israel a few days ago and the corresponding barbarity of what has only just begun in the Gaza, we would be wise to ponder that short sentence. The objective of Hamas was obviously not to simply avenge the Palestin…
Did the Hamas ‘action’ give the Israeli leadership, and Netanyahu in particular, the justification it desired to ‘flatten Gaza’ and ‘finish the job’, whilst simultaneously eliminating political challenges at home? Was it allowed to happen? Maybe. It’s certainly a possibility worthy of consideration. But perhaps it goes deeper, further and darker than even that. As I have argued, it seems clear that the real action h…
https://open.substack.com/pub/thispivotalmoment/p/thoughts-on-the-situation-in-israel
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thispivotalmoment. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How many of you genuinely believe that humanity can prevent this WEF's surveillance and social control agenda from being implemented versus how many think it's a done-deal because people are just too compliant, dumbed-down and easily manipulated?
- We can turn this around and prevent the WEF's dysoptian vision from becoming a reality.58%
- We can't stop it. People are just too dumbed-down and compliant.27%
- Neither option encapsulates my belief15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 November 2022 to 23 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ThisPivotalMoment” (@thispivotalmoment), 2,485 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thispivotalmoment.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.