Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for This is me trying

Channel

This is me trying

@thisiismetrying

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,211subscribers

+3,275 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002544289783
TypeChannel
Username@thisiismetrying
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/thisiismetrying

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

8,100 average views per post against 6,124 subscribers — an engagement rate of 132.3%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled89,140
Mature posts only132.3% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers6,124 measured 3 November 2026
Cohortb3162:fas · 5,759 channels · p10 2.16% · p25 5.05% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.9% · p90 35.8%
Position in cohort99.253th percentile · 11.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.057% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

2,9366,2254,580.59 August 2026 — 2,936 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,936 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,055 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,196 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,273 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,311 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,398 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,455 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,703 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,025 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,131 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,284 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,454 subscribers29 September 2026 — 5,157 subscribers7 October 2026 — 5,344 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,497 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,583 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,629 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,665 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,833 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,933 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,028 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,124 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,225 subscribers9 November 2026 — 6,211 subscribers6,2119 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +3,275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,443–6,718 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 22:046,211-14
6 Nov 2026, 04:566,225+101
3 Nov 2026, 01:086,124+96
31 Oct 2026, 06:466,028+95
28 Oct 2026, 13:405,933+100
25 Oct 2026, 12:595,833+168
22 Oct 2026, 09:555,665+36
19 Oct 2026, 10:555,629+46
16 Oct 2026, 09:365,583+86
13 Oct 2026, 11:495,497+153
7 Oct 2026, 02:175,344+187
29 Sept 2026, 19:425,157+703
19 Sept 2026, 12:214,454+170
14 Sept 2026, 23:384,284+153
11 Sept 2026, 17:564,131+106
7 Sept 2026, 08:174,025+322
2 Sept 2026, 11:123,703+248
30 Aug 2026, 02:243,455+57
27 Aug 2026, 04:343,398+87
23 Aug 2026, 21:373,311first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
126.2%
avg views ÷ 6,211 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,840
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held33 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total109,770
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 33 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @thisiismetrying. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,030 viewsread 6 November 2026

به قول اورول من قادر نیستم و نمی خوام، اون جهان بینی رو که در دوران طفوليتم کسب کردم، به شکلی کامل از کف بدم. مادام که زنده و شاداب هستم احساس عميقم رو درمورد سبك نثر نويسي، عشق به سطح زمین و شور و شعف به اشیای جامد و به دست آوردن خرده اطلاعات ظاهرا بی مصرف از دست نخواهم داد. سعی در خفه ساختن اون قسمت از وجودم بی فایدست. وظیفه حکم میکنه که دوست داشته ها و دوست نداشته های اكتسابیم رو با فعالیت های ضرورتاً جمعی و غیر ف…

5 Nov 2026, 10:21 UTC≈2,920 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

شما هم قبول دارید با کامو دارن کاری رو میکنن که با چگوارا کردن؟

5 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC≈4,940 views0 reactions6 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 6 November 2026

عواملی که بعد از آزمون باید در نظر بگیریم: _ افزایش درصدها. درصد هر درس توی یه بازه‌ی زمانی معقول چقدر باید افزایش پیدا کنه؟ آیا روند افزایش درصدها با میزان مطالعه و زمانی که برای اون درس گذاشتید، هم‌خوانی داره؟ _ افزایش تراز. هرچقدر تراز بالاتر می‌ره، بالا بردنش سخت‌تر می‌شه و طبیعتاً میزان رشد هم کمتر می‌شه. مثلاً برای تراز ۵۰۰۰، رشد ۳۰۰ تایی و برای تراز ۶۰۰۰، رشد ۲۰۰ تایی می‌تونه معقول باشه. ترازهای ۷۰۰۰ به بالا …

1 Nov 2026, 11:59 UTC≈8,570 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

«اصلاً کی می‌دونه آخرش چی می‌شه؟»

30 Oct 2026, 18:06 UTC≈10,000 viewsread 6 November 2026

قلق‌گیری شناختی! قبل از اینکه بخوایم یک برنامه‌ی مطالعاتی جدی و منظم برای خودمون بچینیم، باید خودمون رو بشناسیم. اینکه چقدر توان مطالعه داریم، سرعت یادگیری و تست‌زنیمون چقدره، چه ساعتی تمرکز بهتری داریم و چه شرایطی بازدهی‌ ما رو بهبود میبخشه. به عنوان مثال: -روزی ۴ تا درس تخصصی برامون مناسبه؟ -روز رو با کدوم درس شروع کنیم بهتره؟ -هر صفحه از هر درس چقدر زمان می‌بره؟ -توی ۹۰ دقیقه، چند تستِ بدون تحلیل می‌تونیم بزنیم؟ -…

27 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC≈7,840 viewsread 6 November 2026

واقعا ساعت خوابم طوری شده که هر لحظه ممکنه تایلر دردن رو ببینم.

27 Oct 2026, 17:25 UTC≈11,500 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

26 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC≈7,630 viewsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @hadis_journey

آیدا چه طوری همزمان هم اینقدر قشنگی هم نازنازی هستی! هم درس میخونی! هم فلسفی هستی! هم اینقدر چیزهای جالب بلدی؟ خودم سال کنکور شبیه یه هیولا بودم و این همه لطالفت آیدا در بیان کلمات همیشه به وجد میاره منو 😩😭 دختر نازنازی من امیدوارم به همه آرزوهات برسی💗🌟

25 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC≈12,000 viewsread 6 November 2026

مغزت با چیزی که هر روز تکرار می‌کنی، خودش رو تغییر میده! توی نوساینس به این موضوع میگن انعطاف پذیری عصبی. مغزت با تکرار یک رفتار یا ایجاد الگوی ذهنی مداوم، توی اون کار قوی میشه. یعنی اگه هر روز تمرین کنی که فکرهای جدید بسازی، چیزای جدید یاد بگیری و مسیر های جدید ذهنی ایجاد کنی مغزت واقعاً مسیرهای عصبی جدید میسازه! یعنی تو داری با عادت های روزانت مغزت رو واقعاً شکل میدی.

25 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC≈8,710 viewsread 6 November 2026

«وقتی شما به چیزی علاقه نشون می‌دی یک حساسیت ایجاد می‌شه و این حساسیت (sensitization) درنهایت منجر به آزادسازی دوپامین می‌شه و اون فعالیت بعد از مدتی برای شما اعتیادآور و لذت‌بخش می‌شه. من فکر می‌کنم در هر حوزه‌ای می‌توان وارد شد، حریص شد و بقول امروزی‌ها خوره شد چون معتقدم توان لذت بردن از امور جهان نیازمند نوعی اکتساب است؛»

22 Oct 2026, 17:24 UTC≈12,900 views0 reactions3 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @thisiismetrying. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @thisiismetrying as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“This is me trying” (@thisiismetrying), 6,211 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thisiismetrying.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.