Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for How2Code

Channel

How2Code

@thinkingandcoding

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

119subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393739088
TypeChannel
Username@thinkingandcoding
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thinkingandcoding

Growth

1171191187 August 2026 — 117 subscribers9 August 2026 — 117 subscribers16 August 2026 — 118 subscribers23 August 2026 — 119 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 117–119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 15:17119+1
16 Aug 2026, 16:18118+1
9 Aug 2026, 05:15117no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:53117first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 February 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 Mar 2026, 13:39 UTC158 viewsread 9 August 2026

今年的更新指标完成了 一名"古法"编程师,最终购入了顶配 Coding Plan...

Signed Lazymio

26 Mar 2025, 12:06 UTC331 viewsread 9 August 2026

今天学习到一个神奇的概念,谜底放在最后 这段代码 为什么 name 可以返回一个 stack 上的 Cow 对象 谜底: Const Promotion

Signed Lazymio

9 Feb 2025, 07:30 UTC348 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://blog.ihomura.cn/2025/02/09/DeepSeek-R1-671b-%E9%83%A8%E7%BD%B2%E7%AC%94%E8%AE%B0/ Deepseek R1 已经成为了我 o1 的平替。

Signed Lazymio

22 Sept 2024, 09:23 UTC390 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://blog.lazym.io/2024/09/22/mmap-and-Overcommit-memory-on-Windows/ 超额完成今年更新指标

Signed Lazymio

22 Jul 2024, 06:36 UTC499 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

上图Typescript代码在5.5.5的结果

  1. 编译失败,因为 a.filter 返回的不是 Promise31%
  2. 编译成功,输出 [1,2,3]28%
  3. 编译成功,输出 []42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Lazymio

22 Jul 2024, 06:28 UTC395 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

上图Typescript代码在5.5.5的结果

  1. 编译失败,因为a的类型错误10%
  2. 编译成功,输出 [1,2,3]41%
  3. 编译成功,输出 []48%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Lazymio

19 Jul 2024, 15:37 UTC262 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://blog.lazym.io/2024/07/19/Escaping-from-sync-to-async-world-and-vice-versa/ 如何在 rust 的 sync 和 async 反复横跳? 今年的更新指标完成啦

Signed Lazymio

20 Jan 2024, 12:09 UTC326 viewsread 9 August 2026

还好磁盘满了提醒我了,不然感觉要检查更久了(

Signed Lazymio

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thinkingandcoding. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2024, 06:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz36 voters

上图Typescript代码在5.5.5的结果

  1. 编译失败,因为 a.filter 返回的不是 Promise31%
  2. 编译成功,输出 [1,2,3]28%
  3. 编译成功,输出 []42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Jul 2024, 06:28 UTCAnonymous Quiz29 voters

上图Typescript代码在5.5.5的结果

  1. 编译失败,因为a的类型错误10%
  2. 编译成功,输出 [1,2,3]41%
  3. 编译成功,输出 []48%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2022 to 28 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“How2Code” (@thinkingandcoding), 119 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thinkingandcoding.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.