Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

招财猫(南区天然大奶子)

@thhhtggyu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

197subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003609945717
TypeChannel
Username@thhhtggyu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/thhhtggyu

Growth

182197189.512 Aug 2026, 20:47 — 182 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:06 — 197 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:4713 Aug 2026, 08:06
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 180–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:06197+15
12 Aug 2026, 20:47182first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
113.7%
avg views ÷ 197 subscribers
Avg views / post
224
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total4,254
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:泰酷辣 【验证时间】:8.12 【妹子花名】:#招财猫 【所在位置】:#南区 【课室环境】:10 复式住宅 【上课学费】:600p 【颜值打分】:10老师比照片瘦的 【胸器罩杯】:D 很软 【服务内容】:倒立口,陪洗,猫式口,课表上都有 【服务详情】: 上次不小心鸽了老师,这次兴趣一起便和老师约课,到地方老师遥控上楼,打开门老师便热情迎接,老师的身材立马让我有了反应,老师热情地带着我到沙发坐下休息,老师说又是一个小帅哥来了,让我心花怒放,老师边聊边挑逗我,交完水费后老师让我脱下衣服,牵着我上二楼洗浴,老师全程陪洗,当小孩般帮洗,在浴室进行水中箫和小毒龙,我被老师的翘臀和大奶吸引到了,爱不释手,洗完后便带我到房间选衣服,衣服款式多样,选完后老师让我趴下,做了一套服务,正面也做了一套,包括胸推,臀推,亲身体,还有毒龙,老师还在我胯下口,后面还有倒立口,然后就是猫式口,千变万化的口,接着老

12 Aug 2026, 01:55 UTC185 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @gihrvk

【推荐程度】:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【验证留名】:可匿名 【验证时间】:8月10日晚上 【老师艺名】:#招财猫 【老师链接】:https://t.me/zsgkb2/4386?single 【所在位置】:#南区 【上课学费】:劵后900PP 【身高身材】:166cm 【颜值相似】:8分 【凶器罩杯】:d 【服务内容】:凶推,按摩,dulong,三件套等 【服务详情】:#约的6点半,实际上6点出头我就到了,等了一下下,老师非常热情,身材不错,皮肤也可以,自己说颜值不高,我看挺耐看的,服务很到位,写的都有,第二次很难出也非常耐心,足足待够90分钟了,非常好了。 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:态度好,服务足,有情绪价值,可以拍小视频,容易高潮,下面紧。 ❤️温馨提示:报告仅供参考 ‼️请连同约课记录、付款记录一并提交 💌提交报告至:@zpybt_uibot

11 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC228 viewsread 12 August 2026

开课,今天开白天,佛系一下,约起来哟,😝

10 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC239 viewsread 12 August 2026

下课了,宝贝们,我又摆烂去了哈,你们慢慢浪,

10 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

开课了,脑么们,这两天太懒了,起太晚了,你们谁能不能都来上早课让我早起一点🙈🙈😅😅😜

9 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC244 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:林 【验证时间】:8.6 【妹子花名】:#招财猫 【所在位置】:#南区 【课室环境】:公寓 【上课学费】:600P 【颜值相似】:8 【胸器罩杯】:E 【服务内容】:课表上的都有,还有小皮鞭,写报告可以录个小视频 【服务详情】:老师刚一看门打个照面就觉得老师很漂亮,和照片差的不多,是我喜欢的微胖类型,老师的身材非常哇塞,胸很大很软,是真胸,屁股也很翘,是能明显看出健身的痕迹的,老师的服务也是相当到位,进门先是陪浴,然后水中萧,口活非常棒。洗完擦干身子,先选一件内衣就开始上床服务,老师是十八般武艺样样精通,不亏是以前会所的老师,重点说一下毒龙非常舒服,还有倒立口,非常美妙,老师的配合度也非常高,各种姿势都会,做的时候嘴里骚话不断,真的强烈推荐。 【优点缺点】:优点 服务超多 胸大 屁股大 逼紧 有小皮鞭玩 唯一的缺点是颜值不算顶尖 【推荐程度】:4.5⭐(总共5⭐) 温馨提示:报告仅

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @thhhtggyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,082,247 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“招财猫(南区天然大奶子)” (@thhhtggyu), 197 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thhhtggyu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.